Factors associated with early relapse of infantile haemangioma in children treated for at least six months with oral propranolol: A case-control study using the 2014-2021 French Ouest DataHub.

BACKGROUND: The factors associated with early relapse of infantile haemangioma (IH) after a first course of treatment with oral propranolol for at least six months (initiated after the marketing authorization had been granted) have not previously been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with the risk of early relapse in children with IH treated with oral propranolol according to the current prescribing guidelines. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, retrospective, case-control study, using the Ouest Data Hub database. All children treated for at least 6 months with oral propranolol for IH between 31 June 2014 and 31 December 2021, and with a follow-up visit at least three months after treatment discontinuation were included. A case was defined as relapse of IH within three months of treatment discontinuation; each case was matched for age at treatment initiation and for centre, with four (relapse-free) controls. The association between relapse and treatment or IH characteristics was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) from univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 225 children were included. Of these, 36 (16%) relapsed early. In a multivariate analysis, a deep IH component was a risk factor for early relapse [OR = 8.93; 95%CI: 1.0-78.9, p = 0.05]. A propranolol dosage level of less than 3 mg/kg/day protected against early relapse [OR = 0.11; 95%CI: 0.02-0.7, p = 0.02]. Tapering before propranolol discontinuation was not associated with a lower risk of early relapse. CONCLUSION: The risk factors for late and early relapse are probably different. Investigation of the risk factors for early vs. late IH relapse is now warranted.

[Facial ulcerated nodules revealing primary cutaneous CD8-positive aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma]. / Nodules ulcérés du visage révélant un lymphome T cutané épidermotrope CD8+ cytotoxique agressif.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive, epidermotropic, cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Herein we report a new case, with facial lesions, which was difficult to diagnose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 39-year-old woman was hospitalized for ulcerated nodules on the face that had been developing rapidly for 8 weeks. She had visited Djerba, Tunisia, 3 months earlier. No abnormalities were found on previous routine blood tests. Histopathological analysis of a skin biopsy had revealed non-specific lymphocytic infiltrate. Various therapies, including amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, valaciclovir, corticosteroids, colchicine and doxycycline, proved ineffective. Screening of the cutaneous sample for leishmaniasis proved positive using PCR but negative by direct examination and culture. Treatment was initiated with meglumine antimoniate. A further cutaneous biopsy revealed diffuse lymphocytic proliferation and led to a diagnosis of cutaneous CD8+ aggressive, epidermotropic, cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma. A PET scan showed multiple sites of hypermetabolism affecting the face and lymph nodes. Meglumine antimoniate was stopped and the patient experienced complete remission after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Ulcerated nodules with acute progression on acral sites are characteristic of cutaneous CD8+ aggressive, epidermotropic, cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma. In our case, the positive result of PCR screening for Leishmania that was ultimately considered a false positive was a confounding factor in the diagnostic process. Regarding therapy, aggressive treatment strategies such as multiagent chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation are needed due to the rapid progression of the lymphoma.

[Facial skin cancers: Comparison of opinions in French multidisciplinary team meetings]. / Cancers cutanés de la face : avis comparés de réunions de concertation pluridisciplinaire françaises.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diversity, or homogeneity, of recommendations made in multidisciplinary team meetings (MTM) concerning the management of facial skin cancers in France, and to analyze the determinants thereof. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We contacted a panel of dermatology and ENT multidisciplinary teams (MDT) and collected their recommendations made at meetings regarding 3 clinical cases: squamous cell carcinoma in a renal transplant patient with an incomplete excision margin (case 1), locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (case 2), and lentigo maligna (case 3). The responses were analyzed globally and then based on 2 subgroups defined by the presence or absence of a dermatologist in the MTM. The effect of the makeup of the MTM (based on the presence of a dermatologist, a plastic surgeon, an oncologist and an ENT specialist) was evaluated for the main therapeutic proposals. RESULTS: The opinions of the 45 MDMs that responded to the survey were mixed for the three cases as regards important elements such as the indication of surgical revision for case 1, the proposal of an alternative treatment to surgery for case 2, and monitoring arrangements for case 3. Certain proposals were associated with the presence of a dermatologist in the MTM, such as discussion of adaptation of immunosuppressive treatment and details of the surgical margins to be applied for case 1, as well as simple monitoring and details of monitoring arrangements in case 3. CONCLUSION: It is important to maintain dermatologists in MTMs on account of their expertise in all therapeutic areas concerning skin cancers.

[Procedure for daylight methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy to treat actinic keratoses]. / Modalités pratiques de traitement des kératoses actiniques par photothérapie dynamique topique en lumière du jour avec l'aminolévulinate de méthyle.

Actinic keratosis (AK), also known as solar keratosis or pre-cancerous keratosis, is frequently observed in areas of skin exposed to sunlight, particularly in light-skinned patients. In France, photodynamic therapy using red light (conventional PDT) and methylamino 5-levulinate (MAL) is indicated in the treatment of thin or non-hyperkeratotic and non-pigmented multiple AK lesions or large zones covered with AK lesions. It is well-known for its efficacy but also for its side effects, especially pain during illumination, which can limit its use. An alternative to PDT using natural daylight has recently been proposed to treat actinic keratosis lesions, and results in greater flexibility as well as significant reduction in pain. The lesions are prepared as for conventional PDT, with MAL cream being applied by the physician or the patient, after which they are exposed to natural daylight for 2hours. The lesions are then gently cleansed and protected from natural light for 24hours. This paper seeks to provide a precise description of the daylight PDT procedure for the treatment of AK.

Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream is effective and nearly painless in treating actinic keratoses: a randomised, investigator-blinded, controlled, phase III study throughout Europe.

BACKGROUND: Unmet needs exist in actinic keratosis (AK) treatment. Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has shown good efficacy and safety results compared to conventional PDT (c-PDT) in a recent Phase III multi-centre randomised controlled trial in Australia among 100 subjects with AKs. OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate non-inferior efficacy and superior safety of DL-PDT compared to c-PDT in treating multiple mild and/or moderate facial/scalp AKs. METHODS: Phase III, 12 week, multi-centre, randomised, investigator-blinded, controlled, intra-individual study conducted at different latitudes in Europe. AKs of adult subjects were treated once with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) DL-PDT on one side of the face and MAL c-PDT contralaterally. Endpoints for DL-PDT concerned efficacy (non-inferiority regarding complete lesion response at week 12) and safety (superiority regarding subject's assessment of pain after treatment, on an 11-point numeric rating scale). Safety evaluation also included incidence of adverse events. Subject satisfaction was described using a questionnaire at baseline and last visit. RESULTS: At week 12, the total lesion complete response rate with DL-PDT was similar (non-inferior) to c-PDT (70% vs. 74%, respectively; 95% CI [-9.5; 2.4] in PP analysis, confirmed in ITT analysis). In addition, efficacy of DL-PDT was demonstrated regardless of weather conditions (sunny or cloudy). DL-PDT was nearly painless compared to c-PDT (0.7 vs. 4.4, respectively; P < 0.001), better tolerated and resulted in higher subject satisfaction. CONCLUSION: DL-PDT in comparison with c-PDT was as effective, better tolerated and nearly painless with high patient satisfaction, and may be considered a treatment of choice to meet needs of patients with mild or moderate facial/scalp AKs.

Prognostic and predictive values of oncogenic BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT and MITF in cutaneous and mucous melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Mutations of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT oncogenes are preferentially described in certain histological subtypes of melanoma and linked to specific histopathological features. BRAF-, MEK- and KIT-inhibitors led to improvement in overall survival of patients harbouring mutated metastatic melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and types of BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT and MITF mutations in cutaneous and mucous melanoma and to correlate mutation status with clinicopathological features and outcome. METHODS: Clinicopathological features and mutation status of 108 samples and of 98 consecutive patients were, respectively, assessed in one retrospective and one prospective study. Clinicopathological features were correlated with mutation status and the predictive value of these mutations was studied. RESULTS: This work identified significant correlations between BRAF mutations and melanoma occurring on non-chronic sun-damaged skin and superficial spreading melanoma (P < 0.05) on one hand, and between NRAS mutations and nodular melanoma (P < 0.05) on the other hand. Younger age (P < 0.05), microscopic (P < 0.05) and macroscopic (P < 0.05) lymphatic involvement at diagnosis of primary melanoma were significantly linked to BRAF mutations. A mutated status was a positive predictive factor of a response to BRAF inhibitors (OR = 3.44). Mutated melanoma showed a significantly (P = 0.038) higher objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy (26.3%) than wild-type tumours (6.7%). CONCLUSION: Clinical and pathological characteristics of the primary melanoma differed between wild-type and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated tumours. Patients with BRAF-mutated tumours were younger at diagnosis of primary melanoma. Patients carrying mutations showed better responses better to specific kinase inhibitors and interestingly also to systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Cutaneous melanoma in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a retrospective series of 15 patients.

BACKGROUND: Several case reports suggested that tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) inhibitors might increase the incidence and/or alter the natural course of melanoma towards a more aggressive behaviour. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to point if history of melanoma in patients exposed to TNF inhibitors could present with a particular pattern at diagnosis or during follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study settled in the West part of France to collect and analyse all cases of patients with melanoma who received anti-TNF therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen cases were included. First, 10 patients (mean age: 55.6 years; sex ratio: 1) had a melanoma diagnosed after TNF inhibitors initiation. The mean duration between initiation of treatment and melanoma was 48.7 months. Two patients died of metastatic disease. Second, four patients had a past history of melanoma before anti-TNF therapy (mean duration of treatment: 10.8 months). None experienced a progression of melanoma disease. Last, one woman had a past history of melanoma before and then developed a second melanoma when exposed to biotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our case series does not reveal a distinct profile of melanoma in the patients exposed to TNF inhibitors. Additional prospective trials including larger number of patient are needed to demonstrate the possible link between biological therapy with TNF inhibitors and development of melanoma.

[Eruptive naevi in epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria patients]. / Nævus éruptifs sur épidermolyse bulleuse héréditaire.

BACKGROUND: EB naevus (EBN) are little-known, atypical, eruptive, pigmented melanocytic lesions that may occur in former sites of bullae occurring in epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria (EBH). We sought to describe the characteristics of such lesions and assess their course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, two-centre study in which data was collated from the medical files of patients with EBN. We analyzed the patients' demographical data as well as the clinical, dermatoscopic, pathological features of EBN and their progression. RESULTS: Eight patients were studied: they were principally Caucasian (5/8), with a sex ratio of 1. All variants of EBH were represented and most were recessive (63%). We analysed 22 EBN, all atypical and emerging before the age of 10 years (73%), ubiquitously distributed and measuring greater than 5 cm(2) (25%). Of the 13 EBN subjected to dermatoscopy, 12 exhibited a benign reticular pattern. Four were biopsied, and analysis revealed three common naevi and one lentigo. After a median follow-up of 8 years, the EBN seen were either stable (68%), had regressed (23%) or had disappeared (one case). No cases of melanoma were diagnosed. DISCUSSION: EBN are acquired and atypical pigmented naevi. Sixty-four cases of EBN have been reported in the literature up to date. The dermatoscopic features may be evocative of melanoma (17/23 EBN), but to our knowledge no cases of melanoma at a naevus site have been reported. Recessive transmission of EBH appears to be a risk factor (63% of cases), a finding supported by certain pathophysiological hypotheses. CONCLUSION: EBN present atypical clinical and dermatoscopic features. However, while prophylactic total excision did not appear warranted in the absence of any reported cases of melanoma, regular clinical follow-up is recommended.

[Strontium ranelate-induced DRESS syndrome]. / Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse (DRESS) au ranélate de strontium.

INTRODUCTION: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe form of adverse drug reaction. Strontium ranelate has recently been authorised for postmenopausal osteoporosis. We report a case of strontium ranelate-induced DRESS complicated by linear Ig A dermatosis due to vancomycin. CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old woman with osteoporosis had been treated by strontium ranelate for 4 weeks when she developed a febrile generalized skin rash. Blood tests showed eosinophilia (12.74 × 10(9)/L) and liver damage. A diagnosis of DRESS was made, leading to discontinuation of strontium ranelate and prescription of systemic corticosteroids. Two days later, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia occurred and treatment with vancomycin was started. The liver dysfunction resolved. After two weeks of antibiotherapy, bullous lesions were noted on the thighs. Skin biopsy results suggested a diagnosis of linear IgA bullous dermatosis. Vancomycin was stopped. Two weeks later, the eruption resolved. The eosinophil count gradually returned to normal after four months of corticosteroid therapy. DISCUSSION: More than 15 cases of DRESS syndrome have been reported in Europe, including 2 deaths related to ranelate strontium, prompting European health authorities to publish a warning concerning the risk of strontium ranelate-induced DRESS. A particular feature of our patient was complication with linear IgA bullous dermatosis caused by vancomycin. In conclusion, it is essential to be aware of the risk of severe cutaneous reaction to strontium ranelate, a new drug used to treat osteoporosis.

Physicians involved in the care of patients with high risk of skin cancer should be trained regarding sun protection measures: evidence from a cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge, regarding sun protection, is essential to change behaviour and to reduce sun exposure of patients at risk for skin cancer. Patient education regarding appropriate or sun protection measures, is a priority to reduce skin cancer incidence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge about sun protection and the recommendations given in a population of non-dermatologists physicians involved in the care of patients at high risk of skin cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study. Physicians were e-mailed an anonymous questionnaire evaluating the knowledge about risk factors for skin cancer, sun protection and about the role of the physician in providing sun protection recommendations. RESULTS: Of the responders, 71.4% considered that the risk of skin cancer of their patients was increased when compared with the general population. All the responders knew that UV-radiations can contribute to induce skin cancers and 71.4% of them declared having adequate knowledge about sun protection measures. A proportion of 64.2% of them declared that they were able to give sun protection advices: using sunscreens (97.8%), wearing covering clothes (95.5%), performing regular medical skin examination (91.1%), to avoid direct sunlight exposure (77.8%), avoiding outdoor activities in the hottest midday hours (73.3%) and practising progressive exposure (44.4%). CONCLUSION: Non-dermatologist physicians reported a correct knowledge of UV-induced skin cancer risk factors. The majority of responders displayed adequate knowledge of sun protection measures and declared providing patients with sun protection recommendation on a regular basis. Several errors persisted.