Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity score matched multicentric comparative French study.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has gained momentum for left pancreatic resections. However, debate remains about whether it has any advantage over open surgery for distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: This retrospective review examined pancreatectomies performed for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at 21 centers in France between January 2014 and December 2018. Short and long-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching based on tumor size, sex, age, body mass index, center, and method of pancreatic transection. RESULTS: During the period study, 274 patients underwent left pancreatic resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [109 underwent distal splenopancreatectomy, and 165 underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy [(splenic vessel preservation (n = 97; 58.7%)/splenic vessel resection (n = 68; 41.3%)]. Before propensity score matching, minimally invasive surgery was associated with a lower rate of major morbidity (P = .004), lower rate of postoperative delayed gastric emptying (P = .04), and higher rate of "textbook" outcomes (P = .04). After propensity score matching, there were 2 groups of 54 patients (n = 30 distal splenopancreatectomy; n = 78 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with less blood loss (P = .05), decreased rate of major morbidity (6% vs. 24%; P = .02), less delayed gastric emptying (P = .05) despite similar rates of postoperative fistula, hemorrhage, and reoperation (P > .05). The 5-year overall survival (79% vs. 75%; P = .74) and recurrence-free survival (10% vs 17%; P = .39) were similar. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery for left pancreatic resection can be safely proposed for patients with resectable left pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Minimally invasive surgery decreases the rate of major complications while providing comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.

Graft reduction in adult liver transplantation: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Graft reduction can be a patient's graft-saving option to avoid large-for-size (LFS) syndrome. This study aimed to summarize the literature on graft reduction in adult liver transplantation and to demonstrate the technique of H67 graft hepatectomy. METHODS: The technique, shown in a didactical video, entails an ex situ posterior sectionectomy under hypothermic perfusion. The right hepatic vein is identified, and the transection line follows the right hepatic fissure. The Glissonean pedicles are ligated during parenchymal transection. RESULTS: A narrative review of the literature yielded 7 studies. A total of 15 liver grafts were reduced in adult liver transplantations. Most of the reductions were ex situ (11/15 [73.3%]). Graft reduction entailed an H67 sectionectomy in 10 cases and an H23 sectionectomy in 1 case. In situ reduction included 1 right hepatectomy (H5678), 2 H67 sectionectomies, and 1 H23 left lateral sectionectomy. The duration of the ex situ reduction averaged 56 minutes (median: 40.5 minutes; IQR, 33.0-130.0), and the graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio decreased from 3.57% ± 0.40% to 2.70% ± 0.50% after graft reduction. The average cold ischemia time was 390 minutes (IQR, 230-570). There was no liver retransplantation. CONCLUSION: Graft reduction in adult liver transplantation may be necessary to avoid LFS syndrome. Ex-situ H67 posterior sectionectomy represents the easiest graft reduction hepatectomy and is able to minimize the occurrence of graft compression while leaving enough functional liver parenchyma.

REDISCOVER International Guidelines on the Perioperative Care of Surgical Patients With Borderline-resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The REDISCOVER consensus conference aimed at developing and validate guidelines on the perioperative care of patients with borderline resectable (BR-) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Coupled with improvements in chemotherapy and radiation, the contemporary approach to pancreatic surgery supports resection of BR-PDAC and, to a lesser extent, LA-PDAC. Guidelines outlining the selection and perioperative care for these patients are lacking. METHODS: The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used to develop the REDISCOVER guidelines and create recommendations. The Delphi approach was used to reach consensus (agreement ≥80%) among experts. Recommendations were approved after a debate and vote among international experts in pancreatic surgery and pancreatic cancer management. A Validation Committee used the AGREE II-GRS tool to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines. Moreover, an independent multidisciplinary advisory group revised the statements to ensure adherence to non-surgical guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 34 recommendations were created targeting centralization, training, staging, patient selection for surgery, possibility of surgery in uncommon scenarios, timing of surgery, avoidance of vascular reconstruction, details of vascular resection/reconstruction, arterial divestment, frozen section histology of perivascular tissue, extent of lymphadenectomy, anticoagulation prophylaxis and role of minimally invasive surgery. The level of evidence was however low for 29 of 34 clinical questions. Participants agreed that the most conducive mean to promptly advance our understanding in this field is to establish an international registry addressing this patient population ( https://rediscover.unipi.it/ ). CONCLUSIONS: The REDISCOVER guidelines provide clinical recommendations pertaining to pancreatectomy with vascular resection for patients with BR- and LA-PDAC, and serve as the basis of a new international registry for this patient population.

Volumetric Remodeling of the Left Liver After Right Hepatectomy: Analysis of Factors Predicting Degree of Hypertrophy and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy looking for factors predicting the degree of hypertrophy and severe post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS: In a cohort of 121 right hepatectomies, we performed CT volumetrics study of the future left liver remnant (FLR) preoperatively and postoperatively. Factors influencing FLR degree of hypertrophy and severe PHLF were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: After right hepatectomy, the mean degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate of the left liver remnant were 25% and 3%/day respectively. The mean liver volume recovery rate was 77%. Liver remodeling volume was distributed for 79% on segments 2 and 3 and 21% on the segment 4 (p<0.001). Women showed a greater hypertrophy of segments 2 and 3 compared with men (p=0.002). The degree of hypertrophy of segment 4 was lower in case of middle hepatic vein resection (p=0.004). Left liver remnant kinetic growth rate was associated with the standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) (p<0.001) and a two-stage hepatectomy (p=0.023). Severe PHLF were predicted by intraoperative transfusion (p=0.009), biliary tumors (p=0.013), and male gender (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy is not uniform and is mainly influenced by gender and sacrifice of middle hepatic vein. Male gender, intraoperative transfusion, and biliary tumors increase the risk of postoperative liver failure after right hepatectomy.

Extended Right Hepatectomy to Inferior Vena Cava Under Total Vascular Exclusion, Veno-Venous Bypass and In Situ Hypothermic Perfusion of the Future Liver Remnant.

BACKGROUND: Venous obstruction at the hepatic veins-inferior vena cava confluence can be particularly challenging to manage if an associated liver resection is needed. Total vascular exclusion (TVE) with veno-venous bypass (VVB) and hypothermic in situ perfusion (HP) of the future liver remnant can be used in these conditions.1,2 METHODS: The patient was a 58-year-old with a voluminous adrenal cancer invading the kidney, the right liver and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava with intraluminal thrombus extending up to the hepatic veins confluence. A right hepatectomy, extended to segment 1, the right kidney, and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava was planned. RESULTS: The parenchymal liver transection was performed under a TVE, VVB, and HP of the left liver to decrease blood losses and risk of postoperative liver failure. Vena cava reconstruction was achieved by a ringed Gore-Tex prosthesis with reimplantation of the left renal vein. Total duration of veno-venous bypass and liver vascular exclusion were 2 h 40 min and 2 h 10 min, respectively. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 17. CONCLUSIONS: Total vascular exclusion with veno-venous bypass and in-situ liver hypothermic perfusion increases the safety of major liver resection requiring complex vascular reconstruction.1,2 TVE under VVB and HP of the future liver remnant is used at our institution when: (1) TVE will last more than 30 min; (2) vascular reconstruction is needed; (3) in the presence of venous obstruction; (4) in the presence of injured liver parenchyma; and (5) in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities.

Sequential Y90 liver radioembolization and portal vein embolization: an additional strategy to downstage liver tumors and to enhance liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomies.

BACKGROUND: Yttrium (Y)90 liver radioembolization (TARE) induces both tumor downsizing and contralateral liver hypertrophy. In this study, we report the preliminary results of a sequential strategy combining Y90 radioembolization and portal vein embolization (PVE) before major right liver resections. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical, radiological, and biological data of 5 consecutive patients undergoing Y90 TARE-PVE before major right liver resections. Comparison was made with patients undergoing PVE alone or liver venous deprivation (LVD) during the same period. RESULTS: Between January 2019 and September 2022, five patients underwent sequential TARE-PVE. Type of resection included the following: right hepatectomy (n = 1), right hepatectomy + 1 (n = 2), and right hepatectomy + 1 + 4 (n = 2) with no postoperative mortality. Volumetric data showed a mean hypertrophy ratio of 30.4% after TARE and an additional 37.4% after sequential PVE. Patients undergoing sequential TARE-PVE had higher hypertrophy ratio (p = 0.02; p = 0.004), hypertrophy degree (p = 0.02; p < 0.0001), shorter time to normalize bilirubin (p = 0.04), and prothrombin time (p = 0.003; p < 0.0001) compared with patients receiving LVD or PVE. Time from diagnosis to surgery was statistically significant longer in patients undergoing sequential TARE-PVE compared with LVD or PVE (293.4 ± 169.1 vs 54.18 ±18.26 vs 58.62±13.15; p = 0.0008; p = <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report suggests that sequential PVE and TARE can represent a safe and an alternative strategy to downstage liver tumors and to enhance liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomies. When compared with PVE and LVD, sequential TARE/PVE takes longer times but achieves some advantages which warrant further evaluation in a larger setting.

Incidence and outcomes of post-hepatectomy diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy diaphragmatic hernia is the second most common cause of acquired diaphragmatic hernia. This study aims to review the literature on this complication's incidence, treatment and prognosis. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed for all studies related to acquired diaphragmatic hernias after hepatectomy. RESULTS: We included 28 studies in our final analysis, comprising 11,368 hepatectomies. The incidence of post-hepatectomy diaphragmatic hernia was 0.75% (n = 86). The most frequent type of hepatectomy performed was right hepatectomy (79%, n = 68), and the indications for liver resection were a liver donation for living donor transplantation (n = 40), malignant liver tumors (n = 13), and benign tumors (n = 11). The mean onset between liver resection and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia was 25.7 months (range, 1-72 months), and the hernia was located on the right diaphragm in 77 patients (89.5%). Pain was the most common presenting symptom (n = 52, 60.4%), while six patients were asymptomatic (6.9%). Primary repair by direct suture was the most frequently performed technique (88.3%, n = 76). Six patients experienced recurrence (6.9%), and three died before diaphragmatic hernia repair (3.5%). CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic hernia is a rare complication occurring mainly after right liver resection. Repair should be performed once detected, given the not-negligible associated mortality in the emergency setting.

Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. BACKGROUND: Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. METHODS: A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. RESULTS: Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. CONCLUSION: These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.

Additional value of interleukin-6 level to predict histopathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inflammatory biomarkers are increasingly used as outcome predictors in the field of oncology and liver transplantation for HCC, but no study has shown the prognostic value of IL6 after LT. The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of IL-6 on histopathological features of HCC on explant, its predictive value on recurrence risk and its additional value to other scores and inflammatory markers at the time of transplantation. METHODS: From 2009 to 2019, all adults transplanted with a first liver graft and diagnosed with HCC on the explant analysis were retrospectively included (n = 229). Only patients who had a pre-LT IL6 level determination were analysed in this study (n = 204). RESULTS: High IL-6 level at transplantation was associated with a significantly higher risk of vascular invasion (15% vs 6%; p = 0.023), microsatellitosis (11% vs 3%; p = 0.013), lower rate of histological response both in terms of complete response (2% vs 14%, p = 0.004) and of necrosis (p = 0.010). Patients with pre-LT IL-6 level > 15 ng/ml had a lower overall and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.013). Recurrence-free survival was lower in patients with IL-6 > 15 ng/ml with a 3-year recurrence-free survival of 88% versus 78% (p = 0.034). IL6 levels were significantly higher in patients with early recurrence compared to patients without (p = 0.002) or with late recurrence (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: IL6 level at transplantation is an independent predictor of pejorative histological features of HCC and is associated to the risk of recurrence.

Predicting Limited Survival After Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Propensity Score Matched Comparison Between The Primary First And The Simultaneous Strategy.

BACKGROUND: The best surgical approach to treat synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with limited survival comparing patients undergoing primary-first resection (PF) and simultaneous resection (SR) approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 217 patients who underwent resection for synchronous CRLMs between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. There were 133 (61.2%) PF resection and 84 (38.8%) SRS. The two groups of patients were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and cox analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After PSM, two groups of 71 patients were compared. Patients undergoing SR had longer operative time (324 ± 104 min vs 250 ± 101 min; p < 0.0001), similar transfusion (33.3% vs 28.1%; p = 0.57), and similar complication rates (35.9% vs 27.2%; p = 0.34) than patients undergoing PF. The median overall survival and 5-year survival rates were comparable (p = 0.94) between patients undergoing PF (48.2 months and 44%) and patients undergoing SR (45.9 months and 30%). Multivariate Cox analysis identified pre-resection elevated CEA levels (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.20-4.70; P = .01), left colonic tumors (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.68; P = .002), and adjuvant treatment (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.83; P = .01) as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of synchronous CRLM, right colonic tumors, persistent high CEA levels before surgery, and the absence of adjuvant treatment identified patients characterized by a limited survival rate after resection. The approach used (PF vs SR) does not influence short and long-term outcomes.

Gemcitabine-induced peripheral vascular disease and prolonged response in a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is an antimetabolite used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. One of the side effects of gemcitabine is vascular toxicity. Here, we report the case of a patient treated with gemcitabine who had peripheral vascular disease concomitant with a prolonged antitumor response. CASE SUMMARY: A 75-year-old man was diagnosed with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer. Partial response was achieved after 9 mo of gemcitabine. At the same time, the patient reported peripheral vascular disease without necrosis. Chemotherapy was suspended, and after one month the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan showed locoregional tumor recurrence. Gemcitabine was resumed and partial response was obtained, but peripheral vascular disease occurred. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the appearance of peripheral vascular disease may be related to a prolonged response to gemcitabine.

Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize?

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide. Procedure difficulty and patient outcomes depend on several factors which are not considered in the current literature, including the learning curve, generating confusing and subjective results. This study aims to create a scoring system to calculate the learning curve of LC based on hepatobiliopancreatic (HPB) experts' opinions during an educational course. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was submitted to the panel of experts attending the HPB course at Research Institute against Digestive Cancer-IRCAD (Strasbourg, France) from 27-29 October 2022. Experts scored the proposed variables according to their degree of importance in the learning curve using a Likert scale from 1 (not useful) to 5 (very useful). Variables were included in the composite scoring system only if more than 75% of experts ranked its relevance in the learning curve assessment ≥4. A positive or negative value was assigned to each variable based on its effect on the learning curve. Results: Fifteen experts from six different countries attended the IRCAD HPB course and filled out the questionnaire. Ten variables were finally included in the learning curve scoring system (i.e., patient body weight/BMI, patient previous open surgery, emergency setting, increased inflammatory levels, presence of anatomical bile duct variation(s), and appropriate critical view of safety (CVS) identification), which were all assigned positive values. Minor or major intraoperative injuries to the biliary tract, development of postoperative complications related to biliary injuries, and mortality were assigned negative values. Conclusions: This is the first scoring system on the learning curve of LC based on variables selected through the experts' opinions. Although the score needs to be validated through future studies, it could be a useful tool to assess its efficacy within educational programs and surgical courses.