Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 37, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140304

RESUMO

Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of best practices of infection prevention and management, many surgeons worldwide fail to implement them. Evidence-based practices tend to be underused in routine practice. Surgeons with knowledge in surgical infections should provide feedback to prescribers and integrate best practices among surgeons and implement changes within their team. Identifying a local opinion leader to serve as a champion within the surgical department may be important. The "surgeon champion" can integrate best clinical practices of infection prevention and management, drive behavior change in their colleagues, and interact with both infection control teams in promoting antimicrobial stewardship.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cirurgiões/normas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
2.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 6, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416555

RESUMO

The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery appreciates the great effort of the task force who derived and validated the Sepsis-3 definitions and considers the new definitions an important step forward in the evolution of our understanding of sepsis. Nevertheless, more than a year after their publication, we have a few concerns regarding the use of the Sepsis-3 definitions.


Assuntos
Confiabilidade dos Dados , Sepse/classificação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Pressão Arterial , Consenso , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sepse/mortalidade
3.
World J Emerg Surg ; 12: 34, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28775763

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4-6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). CONCLUSION: The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Infecções Intra-Abdominais/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Saúde Global/tendências , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
World J Emerg Surg ; 12: 29, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28702076

RESUMO

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and have been reported as major contributors to non-trauma deaths in the emergency departments worldwide. The cornerstones of effective treatment of IAIs are early recognition, adequate source control, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Prompt resuscitation of patients with ongoing sepsis is of utmost important. In hospitals worldwide, non-acceptance of, or lack of access to, accessible evidence-based practices and guidelines result in overall poorer outcome of patients suffering IAIs. The aim of this paper is to promote global standards of care in IAIs and update the 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.


Assuntos
Guias como Assunto , Infecções Intra-Abdominais/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Intra-Abdominais/cirurgia , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Traumatismos Abdominais/tratamento farmacológico , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/cirurgia , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Cirurgiões/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA