Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rep Biochem Mol Biol ; 8(1): 91-101, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31334294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the usability of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for copy number determination of HER gene family members (ERBB1-4) in invasive breast carcinoma and to explore the association of ERBB1-4 gene copy numbers with clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: Clinical and immunohistochemical characteristics were assessed in 104 BC patients and the molecular subtype was determined for each tumor sample. Furthermore, HER-2/neu status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and equivocal results were confirmed by Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The copy numbers of ERBB1-4 genes were determined by MLPA. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of all patients showed ERBB2 gene-amplification by MLPA, whereas 14.4% of cases showed ERBB-2/neu overproduction at the protein level (IHC). Moreover, only 2.9% and 1.9% of patients showed amplification in ERBB1 and ERBB4, respectively. No copy number changes were observed in ERBB3. Our results indicated a significant association between ERBB2 copy number gain and histological grade (p value= 0.01), stage (p value= 0.02), and tumor subtypes (p value= <0.001). In addition, we found MLPA more accurate in assessing HER2 status with 15.4% and 9.6% gene amplification detection in early stages (1, 2A and 2B) and advanced tumor stages (3A, 3B, and 4), respectively, compared to IHC (early stages= 13.5% and advanced stages= 4.7%). CONCLUSION: According to our findings, MLPA is a fast, precise and low-cost technique to detect ERBB2 amplification, especially in advanced tumor stages. However, due to infrequent amplification found in ERBB1 and ERBB4 as well as the lack of amplification in ERBB3, their importance in the prognostic evaluation of BC patients remains controversial.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA