Influence of brain metastases on the classification, treatment, and outcome of patients with extracranial oligometastasis: a single-center cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION: Increasing evidence suggests that a subgroup of patients with oligometastatic cancer might achieve a prolonged disease-free survival through local therapy for all active cancer lesions. Our aims are to investigate the impact of brain metastases on the classification, treatment, and outcome in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a total of 7,000 oncological positron emission tomography scans to identify patients with extracranial oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤ 5 intra- or extra-cranial metastases). Concurrent magnetic resonance imaging brain was assessed to quantify intracranial tumor burden. We investigated the impact of brain metastases on oligometastatic disease state, therapeutic approaches, and outcome. Predictors for transitioning from oligo- to polymetastatic states were evaluated using regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with extracranial oligometastases and simultaneous brain metastases were identified, primarily originating from skin or lung/pleura cancers (90%, n = 96). Brain metastases caused a transition from an extracranial oligometastatic to a whole-body polymetastatic state in 45% (n = 48) of patients. While oligometastatic patients received systemic therapy (55% vs. 35%) more frequently and radiotherapy for brain metastases was more often prescribed to polymetastatic patients (44% vs. 26%), the therapeutic approach did not differ systematically between both sub-groups. The oligometastatic sub-group had a median overall survival of 28 months compared to 10 months in the polymetastatic sub-group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with brain metastases, a low total tumor burden with an oligometastatic disease state remained a significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Presence of brain metastases should therefore not serve as exclusion criterion for clinical trials in the field of oligometastatic disease. Moreover, it underscores the importance of considering a multimodality treatment strategy in oligometastatic cancer patients.

Clinical management of oligometastatic cancer: Applying multidisciplinary tumor board recommendations in practice.

Aims: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) are an integral part of ensuring high-quality, evidence-based and personalized cancer care. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the adherence to and implementation of MDT recommendations in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). Methods: We screened all oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) scans conducted at a single comprehensive cancer center in 2020. Patients were included if they had evidence of imaging-based OMD from a solid organ malignancy on the index scans, had their OMD case discussed at an MDT, and were treated and followed up at the same center. A switch away from the MDT-recommended treatment modalities was classified as a major deviation; non-MDT-mandated adjustments to a recommended treatment modality were coded as minor deviation. Clinical data was obtained via chart review; statistical calculations were computed using the R software. Results: After review of PET and/or concurrent brain scans, 787 cases of OMD were identified. Thereof, 347 (44.1 %) cases were discussed at MDT, of which 331 (42.1 %) were therapeutically managed and subsequently followed. The three most commonly recommended therapies were systemic therapy (35.6 %), multimodality treatment including definitive local therapy (17.8 %), and radiotherapy (13.9 %). A major deviation was recorded in 16.3 % of cases (most commonly: none of the MDT-recommended treatment modalities were performed: 19 (35.2 %); not all MDT-planned treatment modalities were performed: 12 (22.2 %); and additional treatment modality was performed: 11 (20.3 %). A minor deviation was found in 1.5 % of cases. On multivariable regression, number of distant metastases (n > 1) was associated with a major deviation (OR: 1.85; 95 % CI, 1.0-3.52). Major deviations were associated with a significantly worse OS (p = 0.0034). Conclusions: Adherence to and implementation of MDT recommendations in OMD patients was generally high (83.7%). Major deviations might be further reduced by more careful and elaborate discussions of OMD patient characteristics s and patient preferences.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligoprogression with or without switch of systemic therapy.

Background: Oligoprogression is defined as cancer progression of a limited number of metastases under active systemic therapy. The role of metastasis-directed therapy, using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is controversial as is the continuation versus switch of systemic therapy. We report outcomes of oligoprogressive patients after SBRT, and compare those patients that continued or switched their current line of systemic therapy. Material/Methods: We included patients who developed up to 5 progressive extracranial metastases under systemic therapy for any solid organ malignancy and were treated with SBRT to all lesions at our institution between 01/2014 and 12/2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the interval to the next systemic therapy line determined using cumulative incidence functions. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the influence of baseline and post-progression variables on OS, PFS and survival with the next systemic therapy after SBRT. Results: Among 135 patients with oligoprogressive disease of which the most common primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 46, 34.1 %), 96 continued their current line of systemic therapy after oligoprogression. Among 39 who switched systemic therapy, 28 (71.8 %) paused or discontinued, while 11 (28.2 %) immediately started another systemic treatment. After a median follow-up of 27.2 months, patients that switched and those who continued systemic therapy after oligoprogression had comparable median OS (32.1 vs. 38.2 months, p = 0.47) and PFS (4.3 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.6). The intervals to the next systemic therapy line were comparable between both cohorts (p = 0.6). An ECOG performance status of 2 and immediately starting a new systemic therapy after oligoprogression were associated with a poorer survival without next systemic therapy, while the de-novo OMD state was associated with better survival without next systemic therapy compared to the induced state. Conclusion: Oncological outcomes of patients that continued or switched systemic therapy after SBRT for oligoprogression were comparable, potentially indicating that further lines of treatment may be safely delayed in selected cases.

Patterns of metastatic spread and tumor burden in unselected cancer patients using PET imaging: Implications for the oligometastatic spectrum theory.

Introduction and background: Metastatic disease has been proposed as a continuum, with no clear cut-off between oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. This study aims to quantify tumor burden and patterns of spread in unselected metastatic cancer patients referred for PET-based staging, response assessment of restaging. Materials and methods: All oncological fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-) positron emission tomography (PET) scans conducted at a single academic center in 2020 were analyzed. Imaging reports of all patients with metastatic disease were reviewed and assessed. Results: For this study, 7,000 PET scans were screened. One third of PET scans (n = 1,754; 33 %) from 1,155 unique patients showed presence of metastatic disease from solid malignancies, of which 601 (52 %) and 554 (48 %) were classified as oligometastatic (maximum 5 metastases) and polymetastatic (>5 metastases), respectively. Lung and pleural cancer, skin cancer, and breast cancer were the most common primary tumor histologies with 132 (23.8 %), 88 (15.9 %), and 72 (13.0 %) cases, respectively. Analysis of the number of distant metastases showed a strong bimodal distribution of the metastatic burden with 26 % of patients having one solitary metastasis and 43 % of patients harboring >10 metastases. Yet, despite 43 % of polymetastatic patients having >10 distant metastases, their pattern of distribution was restricted to one or two organs in about two thirds of patients, and there was no association between the number of distant metastases and the number of involved organs. Conclusion: The majority of metastatic cancer patients are characterized by either a solitary metastasis or a high tumor burden with >10 metastases, the latter was often associated with affecting a limited number of organs. These findings support both the spectrum theory of metastasis and the seed and soil hypothesis and can support in designing the next generation of clinical trials in the field of oligometastatic disease.

Dosimetric Analysis of Proximal Bronchial Tree Subsegments to Assess The Risk of Severe Toxicity After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Ultra-central Lung Tumors.

•Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultra-central lung tumors is associated with high toxicity rates.•To evaluate differences in radiosensitivity within the proximal bronchial tree (PBT), the PBT was sub-segmented into seven anatomical sections.•A risk-adapted SBRT regimen of EQD2_10 = 54.4 Gy in 8 or 10 fractions results in excellent local control and low rates of severe toxicity.•Data from a recent meta-analysis, the NORDIC Hilus trial and dosimetric data from this study were combined to create a NTCP model.•A dose threshold of EQD2_3 = 100 Gy to the PBT or any of its subsegments is expected to result in low rates of severe bronchial toxicity.

Dose escalation for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia - a phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is delivered with a planning target volume (PTV) prescription dose of 25 Gy, mostly to the surrounding 75-85% isodose line. This means that the average and maximum dose received by the target is less than 35 Gy, which is the minimum threshold required to create a homogenous transmural fibrosis. Similar to catheter ablation, the primary objective of STAR should be transmural fibrosis to prevent heterogenous intracardiac conduction velocities and the occurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (sVA) caused by reentry. We hypothesize that the current dose prescription used in STAR is inadequate for the long-term prevention of sVA and that a significant increase in dose is necessary to induce transmural scar formation. OBJECTIVE: A single arm, multi-center, phase II, dose escalation prospective clinical trial employing the i3 + 3 design is being conducted to examine the safety of a radiation dose-escalation strategy aimed at inducing transmural scar formation. The ultimate objective of this trial is to decrease the likelihood of sVA recurrence in patients at risk. METHODS: Patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sVA, with an ICD and history of ≥ 1 catheter ablation for sVA will be included. This is a prospective, multicenter, one-arm, dose-escalation trial utilizing the i3 + 3 design, a modified 3 + 3 specifically created to overcome limitations in traditional dose-finding studies. A total of 15 patients will be recruited. The trial aims to escalate the ITV dose from 27.0 Gy to an ITV prescription dose-equivalent level of maximum 35.1 Gy by keeping the PTV prescription dose constant at 25 Gy while increasing the dose to the target (i.e. the VT substrate without PTV margin) by step-wise reduction of the prescribing isodose line (85% down to 65%). The primary outcome of this trial is safety measured by registered radiation associated adverse events (AE) up to 90 days after study intervention including radiation associated serious adverse events graded as at least 4 or 5 according to CTCAE v5, radiation pneumonitis or pericarditis requiring hospitalization and decrease in LVEF ≥ 10% as assessed by echocardiography or cardiac MRI at 90 days after STAR. The sample size was determined assuming an acceptable primary outcome event rate of 20%. Secondary outcomes include sVA burden at 6 months after STAR, time to first sVA recurrence, reduction in appropriate ICD therapies, the need for escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs, non-radiation associated safety and patient reported outcome measures such as SF-36 and EQ5D. DISCUSSION: DEFT-STAR is an innovative prospective phase II trial that aims to evaluate the optimal radiation dose for STAR in patients with therapy-refractory sVA. The trial has obtained IRB approval and focuses on determining the safe and effective radiation dose to be employed in the STAR procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05594368.

Efficacy and safety analysis in metastatic cancer patients treated with multiple courses of repeat radiation therapy.

Background and purpose: Due to advances in oncology, a growing proportion of patients is treated with repetitive courses of radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to analyze whether radiotherapy maintains its safety and efficacy profile in patients treated with multiple repeat courses of irradiation. Material and methods: All patients treated between 2011 and 2019 at our institution were screened for a minimum of five repeat irradiation courses, to analyze treatment characteristics, survival, safety and efficacy. The type of re-irradiation was classified according to ESTRO-EORTC consensus guidelines. Results: A total of n = 112 patients receiving n = 660 radiotherapy courses were included in this retrospective cohort study. The most frequent primary tumors were lung cancer in 41.9 % (n = 47) and malignant melanoma in 8.9 % (n = 10). The most frequent re-irradiation types were repeat irradiation and Type 2 re-irradiation in 309 (46.8 %) and 113 (17.1 %) cases, respectively. Median survival after the first course of radiotherapy was 3.6 (0.3-13.4) years. Response to radiotherapy was observed in 548 (83.0 %) cases and CTCAE toxicity grade ≥ 3 was observed in 21 (3.2 %) cases. An increasing number of RT courses (HR: 1.30, p=<0.0001), Type 1 re-irradiation (HR 3.50, p = 0.008) and KPS ≤ 80 % (HR: 2.02, p = 0.002) were associated with significantly worse treatment responses. Toxicity rates remained stable with increasing numbers of RT courses. Conclusion: Multiple courses of repeat radiotherapy maintain a favorable therapeutic ratio of high response combined with reasonable safety profile.

Dosimetric analysis of 17 cardiac Sub-structures, Toxicity, and survival in ultra central lung tumor patients treated with SBRT.

•Data on cardiac toxicity after SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors remains limited.•We analyzed the dose to 18 cardiac sub-structures and cardiovascular toxicity.•A SBRT regimen of 45 Gy in 8-10 fractions yields good local control and low toxicity.•The highest cardiac doses were observed in the pulmonary artery and left atrium.•Higher doses to the base of the heart seem to be associated with non-cancer deaths.

External validation of three prognostic scores for brain metastasis velocity in patients treated with intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION: Brain metastasis velocity (BMV) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with brain metastases (BMs). In this study, we conducted an external validation and comparative assessment of the performance of all three BMV scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for BM at a single center between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Where possible, all three BMV scores were calculated. Log-rank tests and linear, logistic and Cox regression analysis were used for validation and predictor identification of OS. RESULTS: For 333 of 384 brain metastasis patients, at least one BMV score could be calculated. In a sub-group of 187 patients, "classic" BMV was validated as categorical (p < 0.0001) and continuous variable (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.02-1.03; p < 0.0001). In a sub-group of 284 patients, "initial" BMV was validated as categorical variable (high-risk vs. low-risk; p < 0.01), but not as continuous variable (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99-1.04; p = 0.224). "Volume-based" BMV could not be validated in a sub-group of 104 patients. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, iBMV (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.01-3.38; p < 0.05) and cBMV (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.15 4.68; p < 0.05) were predictors for OS for intermediate-risk patients after first SRT and first DBFs, respectively. cBMV proved to be the dominant predictor for OS for high-risk patients (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.30-6.91; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study externally validated cBMV and iBMV as prognostic scores for OS in patients treated with SRT for BMs whereas validation of vBMV was not achieved.

Potential of ChatGPT in facilitating research in radiation oncology?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT in supporting young clinical scientists with scientific tasks in radio oncological research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven scientific tasks were to be completed in 3 h by 8 radiation oncologists with different scientific experience working at a university hospital: creation of a scientific synopsis, creation of a research question and corresponding clinical trial hypotheses, writing of the first paragraph of a manuscript introduction, clinical trial sample size calculation, and clinical data analyses (multivariate analysis, boxplot and survival curve). No participant had prior experience with an AI chatbot. All participants were instructed in ChatGPT v3.5 and its use was provided for all tasks. Answers were scored independently by two blinded experts. The subjective value of ChatGPT was rated by each participant. Data were analyzed with regression-, t-test and Spearman correlation (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Participants completed tasks 1-3 with an average score of 50% and 4-7 with 56%. Scientific experience, number of original publications and of first/last authorships showed a positive correlation with overall scoring (p = 0.01-0.04). Participants with little to moderate scientific experience scored ChatGPT to be more helpful in solving tasks 4-7 compared to more experienced participants (p = 0.04), with simultaneously presenting lower scorings (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT did not compensate for differences in scientific experience of young clinical scientists, with less experienced researchers believing false AI-generated scientific results.

Socio-economic determinants for the place of last care: results from the acute palliative care unit of a large comprehensive cancer center in a high-income country in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION: The place of last care carries importance for patients at the end of life. It is influenced by the realities of the social welfare and healthcare systems, cultural aspects, and symptom burden. This study aims to investigate the place of care trajectories of patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients hospitalized on our acute palliative care unit in 2019 were assessed. Demographic, socio-economic and disease characteristics were recorded. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify determinants for place of last care. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients were included in this study. Median age was 71 (IQR, 59-81) years. Of these patients, 56% (n = 210) were male. The majority of patients was Swiss (80%; n = 300); about 60% (n = 226) reported a Christian confession; and 77% had completed high school or tertiary education. Most patients (80%, n = 300) had a cancer diagnosis. The acute palliative care unit was the place of last care for 54% of patients. Gender, nationality, religion, health insurance, and highest level of completed education were no predictors for place of last care, yet previous outpatient palliative care involvement decreased the odds of dying in a hospital (OR, 0.301; 95% CI, 0.180-0.505; p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More than half of patients admitted for end-of-life care died on the acute palliative care unit. While socio-economic factors did not determine place of last care, previous involvement of outpatient palliative care is a lever to facilitate dying at home.

Mortality during or shortly after curative-intent radio-(chemo-) therapy over the last decade at a large comprehensive cancer center.

Background and Introduction: Definitive surgical, oncological and radio-oncological treatment may result in significant morbidity and acute mortality. Mortality during or shortly after treatment in patients undergoing curative radio-(chemo)-therapy has not been studied systematically. We reviewed all curative radio-(chemo-)therapies at a large comprehensive cancer center over the last decade. Materials and Methods: The institutional record was screened for patients who received curative-intent radio-(chemo-)therapy and deceased during or within 30 days after radiotherapy. Curative therapy was defined as prescribed dosage of EQD2 ≥ 50 Gy for radiotherapy alone and EQD2 ≥ 40 Gy for radiochemotherapies. Data on demographics, disease and treatment were assembled and assessed. Results: Of 15,255 radiotherapy courses delivered at our center, 8,515 (56%) were performed with curative-intent. During or within 30 days after radio-(chemo-)therapy, 78 patients died (0.9% of all curative-intent courses). Median age of the deceased patients was 70 (IQR, 62-78) years, and 36% (28/78) were female. Median pre-therapeutic ECOG-PS was 1 (IQR, 0-2) and Charlson-Comorbidity-Index was 3+ (IQR, 2-3+). The most common primary malignancies were head and neck cancer (33/78; 42%) and central nervous system tumors (13/78; 17%). Peritherapeutic mortality varied by primary tumor, with the highest prevalence observed in head and neck and gastrointestinal cancer patients with 2.9% (33/1,144) and 2.4% (8/332), respectively. Among patients with known cause of death (34/78; 44%), tumor progression (12/34; 35%) and pulmonary complications/causes (11/34; 35%) were most common. On multivariable regression analysis, a worse ECOG-PS was associated with a relatively earlier peri-radiotherapeutic death (p = 0.014). Conclusion: Mortality during or within 30 days of curative-intent radio-(chemo-)therapy was low, yet highest for head and neck (2.9%) and gastrointestinal tumor (2.4%) patients. Reasons for these findings include rapid tumor progression in some cancers, good patient selection, with ECOG-PS being most useful and predictive for avoiding early mortality. Future research should help refine predictors for peri-RT mortality.

Repeat stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) treated with metastasis-directed definitive local therapy such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are at risk of developing new metastases. Here, we compare characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with a single course and repeat SBRT. MATERIALS/METHODS: OMD patients treated with SBRT to 1-5 metastases were included in this retrospective study, and classified as single course or repeat SBRT. Progression-free survival (PFS), widespread failure-free survival (WFFS), overall survival (OS), systemic therapy-free survival (STFS) and cumulative incidence of different first failures were analyzed. Patient and treatment characteristics predicting the use of repeat SBRT were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 385 patients included, 129 and 256 received repeat or single course SBRT, respectively. The most common primary tumor and OMD state in both groups were lung cancer and metachronous oligorecurrence. Patients treated with repeat SBRT had shorter PFS (p < 0.0001), while WFFS (p = 0.47) and STFS (p = 0.22) were comparable. Distant failure, particularly with a single metastasis, was more frequently observed in repeat SBRT patients. Repeat SBRT patients had longer median OS (p = 0.01). On multivariable logistic regression, low distant metastases velocity and more previous lines of systemic therapy significantly predicted the use of repeat SBRT. CONCLUSION: Despite shorter PFS and comparable WFFS and STFS, repeat SBRT patients had longer OS. The role of repeat SBRT for OMD patients warrants further prospective investigation, focussing on predictive factors to select patients that might derive a benefit.

Recognition of and treatment recommendations for oligometastatic disease in multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Background and introduction: Growing evidence supports a combined modality treatment strategy for patients with oligometastatic disease. However, lack of phase III trial data and uncertainties around patient selection highlight the importance of multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT) in therapeutic decision-making. This study aimed to analyze the recognition of and treatment recommendations for oligometastatic patients by MDTs at a large comprehensive cancer center in order to better understand current treatment patterns of oligometastasis. Materials and methods: For this retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, oligometastatic patients were identified by screening oncological PET and concurrent brain MRI scans conducted at our center in 2020. MDT discussions and recommendations within four weeks of the imaging diagnosis of oligometastasis were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for the addition of local therapy to standard-of-care. Results: A total of 787 oligometastatic cases were identified. Lung cancer and mesothelioma, skin cancer, and prostate cancer were the most common histologies with 231 (29 %), 160 (20 %), and 84 (11 %) cases, respectively. Almost half of the cases (46 %) had one distant metastasis on imaging only. More than half (56 %) of all oligometastatic cases were discussed at an MDT. In 47 % of cases, for which a therapeutic recommendation was reached in an MDT, local therapy was part of the therapeutic strategy. On logistic regression analysis, oligometastatic skin cancer was significantly associated with a recommendation for local therapy (p < 0.05), whereas the number of oligometastases was not (p = 0.202). Conclusion: More than half of oligometastatic cases were discussed in MDTs, of which more than every second received a recommendation including the addition of local therapy. This frequency of MDT use underscores the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making, yet efforts should be increased to standardize reporting and use standard nomenclature on oligometastasis in MDTs to better frame multidisciplinary discussion.

Patient recruitment into clinical studies of solid malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary cancer center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyze clinical trial activities and patient recruitment numbers into prospective clinical studies for solid malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient recruitment numbers in prospective clinical studies of solid malignancies were retrospectively analyzed for the years 2019 - 2021 at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich (CCCZ). Changes in recruitment numbers were tested for association with organ-specific subunits, as well as organizational and treatment-related trial characteristics. To assess differences between categorical variables, Chi-squared test was used. For uni- and multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards were calculated. RESULTS: In 2019, there were a total of 107 studies (registry trials, clinical phase I-III trials, and translational studies) recruiting 304 patients at the CCCZ. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, there were 120 and 125 active trials with a total recruitment of 355 and 666 patients, respectively. No significant differences between the subunits and study characteristics in changes of patient recruitment in clinical phase I-III trials were identified when the year prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2019) was compared to the first year of the pandemic (2020) and to 2020-2021. CONCLUSIONS: Despite healthcare systems around the world have experienced significant disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, data from our tertiary cancer center showed that clinical trial activities were maintained at a high level during the pandemic.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy to defer systemic therapy in patients with oligorecurrent disease.

Background: Patients who develop oligorecurrent disease may be treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to defer the start of systemic therapy and delay its potential side effects. We report oncological outcomes and patterns of failure in patients with oligorecurrent disease treated with SBRT and determine which factors impact the interval to initiation of systemic therapy. Material/Methods: This retrospective study included patients with oligorecurrent disease (≤5 lesions) from any solid organ malignancy, treated with SBRT to all metastases and no systemic therapy for a minimum one month after SBRT between 01/2014 and 12/2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic therapy was analyzed assuming death without systemic therapy as a competing risk. Univariable and multivariable analyses are used to assess predictors of the systemic therapy-free interval. Results: Among 545 patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic disease, 142 patients were treated with SBRT only for oligorecurrent disease. The most common primary tumors were lung and gastrointestinal cancer in 47 (33.1 %) and 28 (19.7 %) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25 months, the median PFS and OS was 6.1 months and 48.9 months, respectively. Distant metastases were the most common first failure, and oligometastatic distant failure occured in 86 patients (60.6 %). New metastases were treated with repeat SBRT in 48 patients (33.8 %). The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic therapy was 24.6 % and 36.8 %, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the number of previous lines of systemic therapy and the cumulative volume of metastases were significantly associated with the interval to initiation of systemic therapy. Conclusion: Selected patients with oligorecurrence achieved favorable OS and low cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic therapy. Prospective studies are warranted to determine how the deferral of systemic therapy impacts OS compared with immediate systemic therapy in combination with SBRT.

Imaging-Based Prevalence of Oligometastatic Disease: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: Oligometastatic disease refers to a distinct state in patients with cancer characterized by a low metastatic burden, with diagnosis being informed by a limited number of distant metastases in radiologic imaging. However, oligometastasis remains poorly understood in terms of its biology and prevalence in the metastatic cascade. In the absence of clinically viable molecular biomarkers, this study examined the prevalence of oligometastasis using oncological imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study is based on all consecutive [fluorine-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- and [gallium-68]-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) scans conducted at our cancer center between January and December 2020. We identified and analyzed all PET scans from patients with a maximum of 5 distant metastases from a solid malignancy and also reviewed concurrent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) imaging in all candidate patients. Data on the number and sites of metastases were extracted from the imaging reports and verified on imaging studies in case of uncertainties. RESULTS: In total, 7000 PET scans were analyzed, of which 1155 were performed in unique metastatic patients, and 637 patients showed extracranial oligometastatic disease (55%). Concurrent cMRI scans were available for 20% (130/637) of extracranial oligometastatic patients, 36 of which proved to be polymetastatic after combined PET and cMRI analysis. Prevalence of oligometastatic disease was influenced by primary tumor histology and was most frequent in pancreatic, liver and gallbladder cancers (59%), but was least frequent in cancer of unknown primary (26%). In 72% of oligometastatic cases, only 1 or 2 metastases were detected. Bone/soft tissue metastases were the most common sites of distant metastasis (41%). About 75% of patients had metachronous oligometastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that about half of patients with metastatic cancer are characterized by a limited tumor burden detectable on PET and cMRI imaging. This finding warrants intensified research efforts to better understand the biology of oligometastatic disease and to optimize multidisciplinary treatment strategies.

Distant Metastasis Velocity as a Novel Prognostic Score for Overall Survival After Disease Progression Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Disease.

PURPOSE: In patients with extracranial oligometastatic disease, distant failure (DF) after local ablative therapies is common. Prognostic scores to guide salvage treatment decision making are currently lacking. Analogous to brain metastasis velocity, we propose distant metastasis velocity (DMV) as a prognostic score for overall survival (OS) and widespread failure-free survival (WFFS) after DF following metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with ≤5 metastases from solid organ malignancies treated with SBRT to all lesions at our institution from 2014 to 2019 were screened, and patients who developed DF were included in this retrospective analysis. DMV was defined as metastases per month, determined at DF, and transformed into a 3-level categorical variable with cut points that minimized the log-rank P value for OS. Simple and multiple linear regression was used to predict DMV based on different patient and treatment variables. The association of DMV and other variables with OS was studied by univariable and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five patients were screened, of which 303 developed DF and were included. The median DMV was 0.7 metastases per month. Patients with <0.5, 0.5 to 1.5, and >1.5 metastases per month were classified as low, intermediate, and high DMV, and had a median OS of 37.1, 26.7, and 16.8 months, respectively (P < .0001). On multivariable analysis, DMV was a strong independent predictor of OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 for low (P < .001) compared with high DMV. Lower DMV was significantly associated with longer WFFS (P = .04). The cumulative metastases volume at baseline (regression coefficient ß = 0.03, P = .04) and oligoprogressive/-persistent disease (ß = 1.91, P = .10) predicted higher DMV. CONCLUSIONS: DMV is a novel metric strongly associated with OS and WFFS after DF following SBRT in patients with oligometastatic disease and should be evaluated for decision making about the optimal multimodality salvage treatment strategy. The prognostic value of DMV should be validated in prospective studies.

Prevalence and predictors for 72-h mortality after transfer to acute palliative care unit.

PURPOSE: Accurate prediction of survival is important to facilitate clinical decision-making and improve quality of care at the end of life. While it is well documented that survival prediction poses a challenge for treating physicians, the need for clinically valuable predictive factors has not been met. This study aims to quantify the prevalence of patient transfer 72 h before death onto the acute palliative care unit in a tertiary care center in Switzerland, and to identify factors predictive of 72-h mortality. METHODS: All patients hospitalized between January and December 2020 on the acute palliative care unit of the Competence Center Palliative Care of the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University Hospital Zurich were assessed. Variables were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of mortality. RESULTS: A total of 398 patients were screened, of which 188 were assessed. Every fifth patient spent less than 72 h on the acute palliative care unit before death. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, predictors for 72-h mortality after transfer were no prior palliative care consult (p = 0.011), no advance care directive (p = 0.044), lower performance status (p = 0.035), lower self-care index (p = 0.003), and lower blood albumin level (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Late transfer to the acute palliative care unit is not uncommon, which can cause additional distress to patients and caretakers. Though clinically practical short-term survival predictors remain largely unidentified, early integration of palliative care should be practiced more regularly in patients with life-limiting illness.

Validation and extension of the METSSS score in a metastatic cancer patient cohort after palliative radiotherapy within the last phase of life.

Introduction and background: Choosing the right treatment for the right patient in a setting of metastatic cancer disease remains a challenge. To facilitate clinical decision-making, predictive tools have been developed to personalize treatment. Here, we aim to assess the use of the recently proposed "METSSS score" as a prognostic tool for overall survival of cancer patients after palliative radiotherapy in the last phase of life. Methods: All patients treated with palliative radiotherapy at the end-of-life at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this study. Data on demographics, diagnosis, treatment and comorbidities was extracted from the treatment planning and the electronical medical records system. To statistically assess the validity of the "METSSS score", the mortality risk score was calculated, followed by stratification of all patients to prognostic risk groups. The prediction of the 1-year overall survival estimates was subsequently calculated. Results: Over the past decade, 274 patients have received palliative radiotherapy during the end-of-life period. One third of patients was female (34%, n = 93). The most frequent primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 121, 44%), and 55% of patients (n = 152) had no comorbidities according to the Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index. The most common radiotherapy site was the brain and eye region (42%, n = 115). The median actual overall survival of all patients was 40 days from the start of radiotherapy. The "METSSS score" survival model predicted that 269 patients (98.1%) belong into the high-risk, four patients (1.5%) into the medium-risk, and one patient (0.4%) into the low-risk group. The predicted median 1-year overall survival was 10%. Discussion: The METSSS score correctly predicted the survival of our end-of-life patient cohort by assigning them into the highest risk category, and it can therefore serve as a decision-making tool when assigning patient to symptomatic radiotherapy.