The role of modifiable risk factors in incident cancer in transport, rescue, and security industries.

PURPOSE: Examine the risk for site-specific incident cancer across representative transport, rescue, and security industries. METHODS: This Danish nationwide register-based study included all 302,789 workers from transport, rescue and security industries in 2001-2015 and 2,230,877 individuals aged 18-64 years from a total sample of the economically active population for comparison. We used Cox models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of incident cancers. We categorized site-specific cancers by using population-attributable fraction (PAF) estimates from the previous literature. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 13.4 years, 22,116 incident cancer cases were recorded in these industries. Compared with the reference population, the age-adjusted cancer incidence with a high PAF was higher among men in seafaring (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.14-1.43), and land transport (HR 1.32; 95% CI: 1.26-1.37), and among women in seafaring (HR 1.26; 95% CI: 1.01-1.57), land transport (HR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.12-1.32), aviation (HR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.05-1.41), and police force (HR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.04-1.40). Overall, tobacco and physical inactivity were the most significant risk factors of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of considerable disparities in incident cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors across industries, the total incident cancer rate was elevated in all industries in both sexes.

Cancer-Related Reductions in Survival: Extent and Duration Evaluated Using a Large Cohort Study of Twins, 1943-2011.

BACKGROUND: The time during which there is an increased risk of death for cancer survivors was evaluated in a large twin study, which allows for matching on shared components such as age, genes, and socioeconomic factors in childhood. METHODS: By use of data from Danish registers, time to death from initial cancer was studied prospectively in twins in two different settings. The twins were diagnosed with at least one cancer in the period 1943 to 2011. Setting I included 5,680 same-sex twin pairs aged 6 and over, while Setting II included 3,218 twin individuals from age 70 and over. The study provides comparisons within twin pairs and across birth cohorts, age at diagnoses, and time at diagnosis. RESULTS: In 2001 to 2011, the 5-year mortality risk for a twin surviving cancer after the age of 70 was twofold that of the co-twin, regardless of sex and zygosity, and it was 1.5-fold if the twin survived the initial 9 months. After 5 to 6 years, the mortality risk corresponded to that of the co-twin. In previous decades, the excess hazard risk was considerably higher for both older and younger cohorts. There were no indications of change in relative survival across old birth cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This large twin study suggested that for a cancer-treatment survivor diagnosed at age 70 or later, the additional mortality risk was largely absent 5 years later, by which time the survival relative to the co-twin was 60%. IMPACT: Elevated mortality risk after cancer is offset after 5 to 6 years.

Risk of major chronic diseases in transport, rescue and security industries: a longitudinal register-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of hospitalisation for major chronic diseases across representative transport, rescue and security industries. METHODS: We performed a register-based study of 624 571 workers from six industries in Denmark between 2000 and 2005, followed up hospitalisation for chronic diseases up to 17 years, and compared with a 20% random sample of the economically active population. RESULTS: HR from the Cox regression models showed that seafarers had higher risk of lung cancer (men: 1.54, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.81; women: 1.63, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.36), and male seafarers had higher risk of diabetes (1.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.43) and oral cancer (1.51, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.88). Men and women in land transport had increased risk of diabetes (men: 1.68, 95% CI 1.63 to 1.73; women 1.55, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.71) and chronic respiratory disease (men: 1.21, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.25; women 1.42, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.53). Among women, a higher risk of gastrointestinal cancer was observed in aviation (1.53, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.89) and police force (1.29, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.65), oral cancer in defence forces (1.83, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.79), and chronic respiratory disease in rescue service (1.47, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.77), while men in defence forces, police force and rescue service had mainly lower risk of these chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: We observed considerable health disparities from chronic diseases across transport, rescue and security industries, with workers in seafaring and land transport generally bearing the greatest relative burden.

Burden and prevalence of risk factors for severe COVID-19 in the ageing European population - a SHARE-based analysis.

Aim: International health authorities suggest that individuals aged 65 years and above and people with underlying comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and obesity are at increased risk of severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the prevalence of risk factors is unknown in many countries. Therefore, we aimed to describe the distribution of these risk factors across Europe. Subject and methods: Prevalence of risk factors for severe COVID-19 was identified based on interviews from 73,274 Europeans aged 50+ participating in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) in 2017. Burden of disease was estimated using population data from Eurostat. Results: A total of 75.3% of the study population (corresponding to approx. 60 million European men and 71 million women) had at least one risk factor for severe COVID-19, 45.9% (approx. 36 million men and 43 million women) had at least two factors, and 21.2% (approx. 17 million men and 20 million women) had at least three risk factors. The prevalence of underlying medical conditions ranged from 4.5% for cancer to 41.4% for hypertension, and the region-specific prevalence of having at least three risk factors ranged from 18.9% in Northern Europe to 24.6% in Eastern Europe. Conclusions: Information about the prevalence of risk factors might help authorities to identify the most vulnerable subpopulations with multiple risk factors of severe COVID-19 and thus to decide appropriate strategies to mitigate the pandemic. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01537-7.

Burden and prevalence of risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease in the ageing European population - A SHARE-based analysis.

Aim: International health authorities suggest that individuals aged 65 years and above and people with underlying comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and obesity are at increased risk of severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the prevalence of risk factors is unknown in many countries. Therefore, we aim to describe the distribution of these risk factors across Europe. Subject and Methods: Prevalence of risk factors for severe COVID-19 was identified based on interview for 73,274 Europeans aged 50+ participating in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) in 2017. Burden of disease was estimated using population data from Eurostat. Results: A total of 75.3% of the study population (corresponding to app. 60 million European men and 71 million women) had at least one risk factor for severe COVID-19, 45.9% (app. 36 million men and 43 million women) had at least two factors and 21.2% (app. 17 million men and 20 million women) had at least three risk factors. The prevalences of underlying medical conditions ranged from 4.5% for cancer to 41.4% for hypertension, and the region-specific prevalence of having at least three risk factors ranged from 18.9% in Northern Europe to 24.6% in Eastern Europe. Conclusions: Information about the prevalences of risk factors might help authorities to identify the most vulnerable subpopulations with multiple risk factors of severe COVID-19 disease and thus to decide appropriate strategies to mitigate the pandemic.

Age-specific cancer rates: a bird's-eye view on progress.

PURPOSE: We aim to shed light on progress in cancer medicine through studying time trends in age-specific rates of cancer incidence and mortality over the last quarter century. METHODS: We analyzed age-specific incidence and mortality rates of all cancer sites combined using the high-quality population-based databases of Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands for the period 1990-2016. RESULTS: Over these 26 years, cancer incidence rates increased in all investigated countries irrespective of age by about 22%. By contrast, cancer mortality rates decreased across all ages, also by about 22%, except ages 80+ years in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, where they remained unchanged. This pattern is consistent with earlier diagnoses and more effective treatments of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This bird's-eye view on cancer reveals substantive progress in cancer medicine.

Associations between perceived information needs and anxiety/depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers: A cross-sectional study.

Purpose: Caregivers to cancer patients often experience information needs. This study investigates the associations between perceived information needs and anxiety/depressive symptoms among caregivers to cancer patients.Design: Cross-sectional study using self-completed questionnaires.Sample: A total of 128 caregivers to cancer patients who participated in a rehabilitation stay at REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Center for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, from April 2016 to March 2017.Methods: The caregivers completed a questionnaire assessing both information needs and anxiety/depressive symptoms. We used ordinal logistic regressions to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between seven information needs and anxiety/depressive symptoms. The reference group was caregivers with no perceived information needs.Findings: The combined score of perceived information needs was associated with higher odds of anxiety (OR = 3.86 per unit increase, 95% CI 1.85-8.03) and depressive symptoms (OR = 3.83 per unit increase, 95% CI 1.15-12.75). For the individual items, our results showed higher odds of anxiety symptoms for caregivers with perceived information needs regarding (1) the disease and its course, for both little need for information (OR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.39-9.43) and substantial need for information (OR = 4.57, 95% CI 1.40-14.93); however, for substantial information needs, an interaction with gender was found showing higher odds for men (OR = 28.90, 95% CI 4.46-187.41), but no significant association for women. Also, substantial need for information regarding the disease and its course were associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms (OR = 11.43, 95% CI 1.18-111.21). Furthermore, we found higher odds of anxiety symptoms for caregivers who perceived information needs regarding (2) which symptoms and adverse effects to be aware of; (3) how to help and support a cancer patient; (4) expected mental responses in a person with cancer; (5) how to find information on the internet, and (6) where to direct caregiver questions and/or concerns after patient discharge.Conclusions: Among caregivers to cancer patients, perceived needs regarding the disease and its course were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Furthermore, several other information needs were associated with anxiety symptoms.Implications for Psychosocial Providers or Policy: To prevent unnecessary anxiety and depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers, health care professionals should be aware of the importance of informing caregivers regarding the disease and its course. Other issues to address concerning anxiety symptoms are information regarding which symptoms and adverse effects to be aware of; how to help and support a cancer patient; expected mental responses in a person with cancer; how to find information on the internet; and where to direct caregiver questions and/or concerns after patient discharge.