Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 11(12): e052188, 2021 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34937718

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the 'gold standard' vascular access for haemodialysis. Universal usage is limited, however, by a high early failure rate. Several small, single-centre studies have demonstrated better early patency rates for AVF created under regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with local anaesthesia (LA). The mechanistic hypothesis is that the sympathetic blockade associated with RA causes vasodilatation and increased blood flow through the new AVF. Despite this, considerable variation in practice exists in the UK. A high-quality, adequately powered, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to definitively inform practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study is a multicentre, observer-blinded RCT comparing primary radiocephalic/brachiocephalic AVF created under regional versus LA. The primary outcome is primary unassisted AVF patency at 1 year. Access-specific (eg, stenosis/thrombosis), patient-specific (including health-related quality of life) and safety secondary outcomes will be evaluated. Health economic analysis will also be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ACCess study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research and ethics committee number 3 (20/WS/0178). Results will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals within 12 months of completion of the trial. We will also present our findings at key national and international renal and anaesthetic meetings, and support dissemination of trial outcomes via renal patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14153938. SPONSOR: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde GN19RE456, Protocol V.1.3 (8 May 2021), REC/IRAS ID: 290482.


Assuntos
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Falência Renal Crônica , Anestesia Local , Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Diálise Renal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 62(6): 1575-82, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26506936

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Continuous suturing techniques have conventionally been used for the end-to-side anastomoses of radiocephalic fistulas (RCFs); however, primary patency rates are poor. Only 50% to 60% of RCFs ever achieve functional patency. We hypothesized that a hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique (as used in many microsurgical procedures) may improve outcomes in fistulas constructed from small vessels. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial comparing hybrid interrupted-continuous (n = 42) with continuous (n = 36) suturing techniques for RCF was undertaken. Patients were excluded if vessels were <1.8 mm in diameter or if previous ipsilateral fistula had been attempted. A priori power calculation indicated that a sample size of 78 patients was required to detect an improvement in patency from 50% to 80% (α = .05, ß = .8). The primary end point was primary patency at 6 weeks (assessed by a blinded observer for the presence of thrill and bruit). Secondary end points were immediate patency, functional patency (assessed clinically and by ultrasound) at 6 weeks, and presence of anastomotic stenosis. RESULTS: Groups were comparable for basic patient demographics, operating surgeon, and vessel diameter as measured on preoperative ultrasound (mean age, 58.9 ± 13 years; 68% male). Primary patency at 6 weeks was higher in the hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique group (71% vs 47%; P = .01). Immediate patency was also higher in the hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique group (93% vs 67%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in functional patency at 6 weeks (52% vs 36%; P = .18). Three patients developed an anastomotic stenosis. All were in the hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique group. One patient from the interrupted suturing technique cohort required re-exploration for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique yielded higher immediate and 6-week primary patency rates for RCF. The hybrid interrupted-continuous suturing technique may improve anastomotic compliance and reduce the narrowing and puckering that can occur on suture tightening in small-caliber vessels. Based on these findings, consideration should be given to performing hybrid interrupted-continuous anastomoses for RCFs.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Técnicas de Sutura , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Radial/cirurgia
3.
J Vasc Access ; 15(5): 344-50, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24532000

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate reasons for tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC) usage in our prevalent hemodialysis population and assess the impact of a surgically aggressive approach to definitive access creation. METHODS: Clinical review of all patients in the West of Scotland dialyzing via a TCVC in November 2010 was performed. Reasons for TCVC usage and TCVC complications were evaluated. Over the subsequent year, aggressive intervention was undertaken to achieve definitive access in all suitable patients and outcomes re-evaluated a year later (November 2011). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients dialyzing via a TCVC in 2010 compared to 2011 (30.3% (n=193) vs. 31.7% (n=201), respectively; p=0.56). All patients now have a "vascular access plan." Of patients dialyzing via a TCVC in 2010, 37% had died by 2011, 22% remained on long-term line, 20% had successful arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation, 1% had an arteriovenous graft and 2% were transplanted; 10.4% developed complications of vascular access and required ligation of a functioning AVF. A further 6.5% died within 28 days of surgery. The incidence of culture-positive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia was 1.6 per 1,000 catheter days. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive strategies of AVF creation resulted in one-fifth of patients on a long-term TCVC having successful creation of an AVF. This was offset against high failure and significant complication rate from AVF creation in this population. One-third of patients dialyzing via a TCVC died in the subsequent year. Correct patient selection for AVF creation is essential and predialysis care must be optimized to avoid the need for TCVCs entirely.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/mortalidade , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres de Demora/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Escócia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA