Impaired attention function based on the Montréal Cognitive Assessment in vascular dementia patients with frontal hypoperfusion: The Osaki-Tajiri project.

We previously reported that the Montréal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was effective in the evaluation of cerebrovascular diseases. We also demonstrated that the test was effective for screening for very mild vascular dementia (VaD) in the community. Herein, we examined the effectiveness of MoCA in the assessment of patients with VaD in an outpatient clinic. Forty-four patients with VaD (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences [NINDS-AIREN] criteria) and 58 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association [NINCDS-ADRDA] criteria) were compared with 67 non-demented control subjects. All were outpatients at the Tajiri Memory Clinic, Osaki-Tajiri, northern Japan. All underwent 1.5 Tesla MRI and ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) examinations. The SPECT images were used to classify the VaD patients into two subgroups, those with frontal hypoperfusion (F-VaD) and those without frontal hypoperfusion. The frontal hypoperfusion pattern was defined as the "P2" pattern of the Sliverman classification, with or without focal hypometabolism in other areas, based on the agreement of three neurologists who were blinded to the results of the neuropsychological examinations. Total scores and attention subscores on the MoCA were lower in the F-VaD group compared with other groups. Our results suggest that the MoCA attention subscale can detect VaD participants, particularly those with frontal hypoperfusion.

Agrafia para Kanji e Kana em comprometimento cognitivo leve e demência: comparação transcultural de indivíduos idosos morando no Japão e Brasil / Kanji and Kana agraphia in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a trans-cultural comparison of elderly Japanesesubjects living in Japan and Brazil

This study verifies the environmental effects on agraphia in mild cognitive impairment and dementia. We compared elderly Japanese subjects living in Japan and Brazil. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the database of the Prevalence Study 1998 in Tajiri (n=497, Miyagi, Japan) and the Prevalence Study 1997 of elderly Japanese immigrants living in Brazil (n=166, migrated from Japan and living in the São Paulo Metropolitan Area). In three Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) groups, i.e., CDR 0 (healthy), CDR 0.5 (questionable dementia), and CDR 1+ (dementia) , the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) item of spontaneous writing and the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) domain of dictation were analyzed with regard to the number of Kanji and Kana characters. Formal errors in characters and pragmatic errors were also analyzed. Results: The immigrants in Brazil wrote similar numbers of Kanji or Kana characters compared to the residents of Japan. In spontaneous writing, the formal Kanji errors were greater in the CDR 1+ group of immigrants. In writing from dictation, all the immigrant CDR groups made more formal errors in Kana than the Japan residents. No significant differences in pragmatic errors were detected between the two groups. Conclusions: Subjects living in Japan use Kanji frequently, and thus the form of written characters was simplified, which might be assessed as mild formal errors. In immigrants, the deterioration in Kanji and Kana writing was partly due to decreased daily usage of the characters. Lower levels of education of immigrants might also be related to the number of Kanji errors.

Este estudo verifica os efeitos do meio ambiente sobre a agrafia em comprometimento cognitivo leve e demência. Nós comparamos indivíduos idosos vivendo no Japão e Brasil. Métodos: Nós, retrospectivamente, analisamos a base de dados do Estudo de Prevalência 1998 em Tajiri (n=497, Miyagi, Japão) e do Estudo de Prevalência 1997 de imigrantes idosos japoneses vivendo no Brasil (n=166, imigrados do Japão e residindo na área metropolitana da cidade de São Paulo). Em três grupos de CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating), isto é, CDR 0 (saudáveis), CDR 0.5 (demência questionável) e CDR1+ (demência), o item de escrita espontânea do Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM) e o domínio de ditado do Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) foram analisados em relação ao número de caracteres em Kanji e Kana. Erros formais nos caracteres e erros pragmáticos foram também analisados. Resultados: Os imigrantes no Brasil escreveram número similar de caracteres de Kanji e Kana comparados aos residentes no Japão. Na escrita espontânea, os erros formais de Kanji foram maiores no grupo de CDR1+ em imigrantes. Na escrita sob ditado, todos os grupos de CDR de imigrantes fizeram mais erros formais em Kana do que os residentes no Japão. Nenhuma diferença foi encontrada em erros pragmáticos entre os grupos. Conclusões: Sujeitos vivendo no Japão usam Kanji freqüentemente, e então, a forma de caracteres escritos foi simplificada, o que pode ser avaliado como discretos erros formais. Em imigrantes, a deterioração na escrita em Kanji e Kana foi parcialmente devida ao uso diário restrito dos caracteres. Baixos níveis educacionais dos imigrantes podem estar relacionados ao número de erros em Kanji.

Incidence of dementia and associated risk factors in Japan: The Osaki-Tajiri Project.

The incidence of dementia and risk factors has not been fully investigated in Japan. Following a prevalence study in 1998, we investigated the incidence and associated factors in the same population in 2003 and 2005. Randomly selected 771 residents in Tajiri were targeted. The final participants included 204 (65.2%) healthy older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR 0) and 335 (73.1%) people with questionable dementia (CDR 0.5). We analyzed the incidence of dementia and dementing diseases, and possible risk factors. The risk factors included demographics, lifestyle-related factors, vascular risk factors, cognitive functions, and MRI findings. Overall, 3.9% of the CDR 0 and 37.0% of the CDR 0.5 participants developed dementia during the 5-year period, whereas 40.2% of the CDR 0.5 participants developed dementia during the 7-year period. Older adults had a higher incidence. Higher CDR Box scores had a higher incidence. Of the dementing diseases, 60.8% of participants developed Alzheimer' disease (AD), followed by vascular dementia (VaD), 17.9%. Logistic regression analyses showed that age, MMSE, cognitive functions such as recent memory, and generalized atrophy were significant predictors of progression to AD. Similarly, predictive factors for progression to VaD were age, MMSE, cognitive functions such as frontal function, and white matter lesions and cerebrovascular diseases. A comprehensive system including CDR, cognitive tests, and MRI, is recommended in community-based health policy planning.