Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 20(8): 959-963, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34030570

RESUMO

Background: Azithromycin maintenance therapy is widely used in cystic fibrosis (CF), but little is known about its long-term safety. We investigated whether chronic azithromycin use is safe regarding renal function, hepatic cell toxicity and QTc-interval prolongation.Methods: Adult CF patients (72 patients using azithromycin for a cumulative period of 364.8 years and 19 controls, 108.8 years) from two CF-centers in the Netherlands with azithromycin (non)-use for at least three uninterrupted years were studied retrospectively.Results: There was no difference in mean decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), nor in occurrence of eGFR-events. No drug-induced liver injury could be attributed to azithromycin. Of the 39 azithromycin users of whom an ECG was available, 4/39 (10.3%) had borderline and 4/39 (10.3%) prolonged QTc-intervals, with 7/8 patients using other QTc-prolonging medication. Of the control patients 1/6 (16.7%) had a borderline QTc-interval, without using other QTc-prolonging medication. No cardiac arrhythmias were observed.Conclusion: We observed no renal or hepatic toxicity, nor cardiac arrythmias during azithromycin use in CF patients for a mean study duration of more than 5 years. One should be aware of possible QTc-interval prolongation, in particular in patients using other QTc-interval prolonging medication.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Azitromicina/efeitos adversos , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Estudos de Coortes , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Testes de Função Hepática , Síndrome do QT Longo/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0239658, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970760

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nebulization of antimicrobial drugs such as tobramycin and colistin is a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, nebulization has a high treatment burden. The Twincer™ is a dry powder inhaler specifically developed for the inhalation of antibiotics such as colistin. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes and experience with colistin dry powder by the Twincer with nebulization of colistin or tobramycin in adult CF patients in a real-life setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from 01-01-2015 until 01-07-2018. Effectiveness was evaluated by comparing FEV1 decline and exacerbation rate during a mean of 4.1 years of nebulization therapy prior to the initiation of the Twincer against the same values during a mean of 1.7 years of treatment with the Twincer. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were evaluated, of whom twelve could be included in the effectiveness analysis, with a total of twenty patient years. Of all patients 71.4% preferred therapy with the Twincer over nebulization. Twincer use resulted in high treatment adherence with an average adherence rate of 92.5%. There was no significant difference in annual decline in FEV1%pred prior to and after start changing from nebulization to the use of the Twincer powder inhaler (median decline -1.56 [-5.57-5.31] and 1.35 [-8.45-6.36]) respectively, p = 0.45 (linear mixed effect model)). No significant difference was found in the number of intravenous or combined total intravenous and oral antibiotic courses during Twincer therapy compared to when using nebulization (1.68 and 2.49 courses during Twincer therapy versus 1.51 and 2.94 courses during nebulization, p = 0.88 and p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Colistin dry powder inhalation with the Twincer is a more patient friendly alternative to nebulization, and we did not observe significant differences in the clinical outcome, regarding lung function and exacerbation rates.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Fibrose Cística/microbiologia , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/normas , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA