Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 32(2): 176-181, 2021 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34966149

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of altitude level on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for patients with morbid obesity. METHODS: At the normal altitude level, 808 patients underwent LSG, and 467 patients underwent LSG in high-altitude regions. The primary outcome was evaluated based on the postoperative morbidity rate. Secondary outcomes were evaluated based on operating time, mortality, hospital stay, percentage of total weight loss (TWL), and comorbidities improvement. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in-hospital stay, time to start oral intake, gastric leakage, overall complications, and hospital mortality between the 2 groups. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mesenteric vascular occlusion were significantly higher in high altitude [11 (1.3%) vs. 14 (3%), P=0.04; 8 (0.7%) vs. 11 (2.4%), P=0.01; 4 (0.5%) vs. 8 (1.7%), P=0.03, respectively]. Patients with normal altitude recorded a better %TWL than those at high altitude after 12 months (41±9 vs. 39±9.6, P=0.002) and after 24 months (41±8 vs. 40±9, P=0.009). In both groups, a significant improvement was noted in comorbidity after LSG. CONCLUSION: The %TWL significantly achieved with LSG in normal and high altitudes. After 12 and 24 months, the %TWL is significantly higher with LSG at normal altitudes. High altitude is associated with a high incidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and superior mesenteric vascular occlusion with LSG.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Altitude , Índice de Massa Corporal , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 181(12): 796-9, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16362790

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Dose delivery accuracy at low monitor units (LMU) was evaluated for photon and electron beams. Knowledge of this study is required for few dosimetric applications and to know the dose delivered to the patient when the treatment is delivered with few monitor units (MU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dose measurements were carried out for photon and electron beams with 0.6 cm(3) PTW ion chamber in white polystyrene phantom at D(max) with a field size of 10 x 10 cm(2) at 100 cm FSD. The relative dose, which is the ratio of dose delivered per MU at the testing to that of the calibration condition, was found out. RESULTS: Significant deviation (+20% to +25%) in dose delivery was noticed for photon and electron beams (+39% to +45%) at LMU settings. Slightly higher inaccuracy in dose delivery was noticed for 6-MV compared to 18-MV photons. The deviation in dose delivery for electron beams was found to be energy-independent and the pattern of variation was similar for all electron energies. CONCLUSION: The dose delivery accuracy at LMU settings has to be ascertained before implementing conformal and IMRT (intensity- modulated radiotherapy) techniques. When there is dose nonlinearity, the treatment delivered with multiple small MU settings can result in significant error in dose delivery.


Assuntos
Elétrons/uso terapêutico , Análise de Falha de Equipamento/métodos , Fótons/uso terapêutico , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Monitoramento de Radiação/instrumentação , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA