Outcomes With Percutaneous Debulking of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis, percutaneous debulking is a treatment option. However, the outcomes of this approach are less well known. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent percutaneous vegetation debulking for tricuspid valve infective endocarditis from August 2020 to November 2022 at a large academic tertiary care public hospital. The primary efficacy outcome was procedural success defined by clearance of blood cultures. The primary safety outcome was any procedural complication. For the composite outcome of in-hospital mortality or heart block, outcomes were compared (sequential noninferiority and superiority) with published surgical outcomes data. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis who underwent percutaneous debulking, the average age was 41.3±10.1 years, all patients had septic pulmonary emboli with 27 (93.1%) patients having cavitary lung lesions before the procedure. For the efficacy outcomes, 28 patients (96.6%) had clearance of cultures after their procedure, mean white blood cell count significantly decreased from 16.8±1.4×103 to 12.6±1.0×103 per µL (P<0.01), and mean body temperature significantly decreased from 99.8F ±0.30 to 98.3F ±0.20 (P<0.001) post-procedure. For safety outcomes, there were no procedural complications (0%). Two patients (6.9%) died during the follow-up period, both during the index hospitalization due to severe necrotizing pneumonia. When compared with published data on surgical outcomes, percutaneous debulking was noninferior and superior for the composite of in-hospital death or heart block (noninferiority, P<0.001; superiority, P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous debulking is feasible, effective, and safe in treating patients with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis refractory to medical therapy.

Interventional Cardio-Oncology: Unique Challenges and Considerations in a High-Risk Population.

OPINION STATEMENT: Patients with cancer are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) including atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD), valvular heart disease (VHD), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Advances in percutaneous catheter-based treatments, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AHD, percutaneous valve replacement or repair for VHD, and ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAODs) for AF, have provided patients with CVD significant benefit in the recent decades. However, trials and registries investigating outcomes of these procedures often exclude patients with cancer. As a result, patients with cancer are less likely to undergo these therapies despite their benefits. Despite the inclusion of cancer patients in randomized clinical trial data, studies suggest that cancer patients derive similar benefits of percutaneous therapies for CVD compared with patients without cancer. Therefore, percutaneous interventions for CVD should not be withheld in patients with cancer, as they may still benefit from these procedures.

Incidental parathyroidectomy in thyroidectomy and central neck dissection.

BACKGROUND: Although higher thyroidectomy volume has been linked with lower complication rates, its association with incidental parathyroidectomy remains less studied. The volume relationship is even less clear for central neck dissection, where individual parathyroid glands are at greater risk. METHODS: Patients undergoing thyroidectomy with or without central neck dissection were evaluated for incidental parathyroidectomy, hypoparathyroidism, and hypocalcemia. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 1,114 thyroidectomies and 396 concurrent central neck dissections were performed across 7 surgeons. Incidental parathyroidectomy occurred in 22.4% of surgeries (range, 16.9%-43.6%), affecting 7.1% of parathyroids at risk (range, 5.8%-14.5%). When stratified by surgeon, lower incidental parathyroidectomy rates were associated with higher thyroidectomy volumes (R2 = 0.77, P = .008) and higher central neck dissection volumes (R2 = 0.93, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, low-volume surgeon (odds ratio 2.94, 95% confidence interval 2.06-4.19, P < .001), extrathyroidal extension (odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 1.24-7.87, P = .016), prophylactic central neck dissection (odds ratio 2.68, 95% confidence interval 1.65-4.35, P <.001), and therapeutic central neck dissection (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.98-9.96, P < .001) were the most significant factors associated with incidental parathyroidectomy. In addition, incidental parathyroidectomy was associated with a higher likelihood of temporary hypoparathyroidism (odds ratio 2.79, 95% confidence interval 1.45-5.38, P = .002) and permanent hypoparathyroidism (odds ratio 4.62, 95% confidence interval 1.41-5.96, P = .025), but not permanent hypocalcemia (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.48-3.35, P = .63). Higher lymph node yield in central neck dissection was not associated with higher incidental parathyroidectomy rates (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.85-8.81, P = .82). CONCLUSION: Higher surgical volume conferred a lower rate of incidental parathyroidectomy. Nonetheless, greater lymph node yield in central neck dissections did not result in greater parathyroid-related morbidity. Such findings support the value of leveraging surgical volume to both optimize oncologic resection and minimize complication rates.

Survival in Middle Ear Malignancy: A Population-Based Analysis Based on the SEER Database.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and survival outcomes of patients with middle ear malignancies at a population level. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with data from a national database. SETTING: National database of middle ear malignancy. METHODS: Records of patients diagnosed with a middle ear malignancy from 1973 to 2016 were extracted from the SEER database (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results). SPSS (version 27; IBM) was used to conduct 5-year survival analysis. RESULTS: The average survival for all 431 patients was 61.4 months. Five-year disease-specific survival for squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA), adenocarcinoma, other carcinoma, and noncarcinoma subtypes varied significantly at 54.6%, 82.1%, 71.8%, and 82.6%, respectively (P < .0001). There was an improved 5-year survival for patients with adenocarcinoma who received surgery versus those who did not (91.7% vs 65.1%; P = .023, log-rank). Five-year disease-specific survival was significantly better in patients aged <55 years (mean ± SD, 77.8% ± 0.39%) as compared with those >70 years (55.1% ± 5.1%) and those aged 55 to 69 years (60.2% ± 4.9%; P < .01 and P < .001, respectively, log-rank). Patients with SCCA were significantly older than those with adenocarcinoma (P < .0001). Noncarcinoma subtypes were more likely to present with local disease, as opposed to regional or distant disease, when compared with SCCA (P = .0027). CONCLUSION: Prognosis and treatment outcomes for primary middle ear malignancies depend on histologic subtype and age at diagnosis. The noncarcinoma and adenocarcinoma subtypes carry the best prognoses. Patients with adenocarcinoma were most likely to benefit from surgery.

Prognostic Impact of Histologic Grade for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While numerous factors affect prognosis in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the comparative impact of histologic grade has not been well described. Moreover, indications for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remain imprecise. We evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes for PTC stratified by grade. METHODS: We profiled histologic grade for PTC (well differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated) via hospital (National Cancer Database) and population-based (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) registries. Cox regression was used to adjust for clinicopathologic covariates. Statistical interactions between subtypes and the effect of EBRT on survival were assessed. RESULTS: Collectively, worsening clinicopathologic factors (age, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, nodal spread, M1 disease) and outcomes (disease-free survival, overall survival) correlated with less differentiated state, across all histologic grades (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed escalating hazard with loss of differentiation relative to well-differentiated PTC (moderately differentiated hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.41, p = 0.02; poorly differentiated HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.23-3.08, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, greater survival benefit was associated with EBRT for poorly differentiated cases (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.72, p = 0.004). This finding was upheld after landmark analysis to address potential immortal time bias (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Worsening histologic grade in PTC is independently associated with parallel escalation in mortality risk, on a scale approximating or surpassing established thyroid cancer risk factors. On preliminary analysis, EBRT was associated with improved survival in the most aggressive or least differentiated subvariants. Further investigation is warranted to examine the efficacy of EBRT for select poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas.