RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients with uncontrolled/refractory gout have heavy disease burden, but few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU), but anti-drug antibodies can limit treatment efficacy. Evidence supports immunomodulator-pegloticase co-administration to increase sustained urate-lowering rates, but published cases are limited. This study investigated experience with pegloticase-immunomodulation co-therapy at two community rheumatology practices. METHODS: Patients initiating pegloticase with immunomodulation in 2017 or later were included. Patient/treatment characteristics and proportion of responders (≥ 12 pegloticase infusions, SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion-12) were examined. Patients on therapy at data collection with < 12 infusions were excluded from response analyses. eGFR before and after therapy was examined. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (79% male, 62.4 ± 16.3 years) with uncontrolled gout (SU = 9.1 ± 2.0 mg/dl, 91% tophaceous) were included. Most-reported comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and CKD (47%). Pre-therapy eGFR was 65.4 ± 25.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (41% eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). All patients initiated immunomodulation before (5.3 ± 3.0 weeks, n = 32) or at (n = 2) first pegloticase infusion. Subcutaneous methotrexate (15.4 ± 4.9 mg/week, n = 20), oral methotrexate (15.3 ± 3.6 mg/week, n = 9), mycophenolate mofetil (1000 mg/day, n = 3), and azathioprine (100 mg/day, n = 2) were administered. Patients received 14.6 ± 7.1 infusions over 28.5 ± 14.9 weeks. Overall response rate was 89%, ranging among immunomodulators (subcutaneous methotrexate: 93%, oral methotrexate: 89%, mycophenolate mofetil: 100%, azathioprine: 50%). On average, eGFR increased during therapy (+ 10.3 ± 16.9 ml/min/1.73 m2), with CKD stability/improvement in 85%. Nineteen patients (56%) experienced gout flares. No infusion reactions or infections were noted. No new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings provide further support for increased pegloticase response rates when co-treatment with immunomodulating therapy is used.
Patients with gout that does not respond to oral urate-lowering therapies have heavy disease burden and few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate levels (SU) and resolves tophi, but anti-drug antibodies can limit urate-lowering efficacy duration. Evidence increasingly supports co-administering an immunomodulator with pegloticase to increase the proportion of patients with sustained urate-lowering response. However, there are few published cases from real-world clinical practice. This study examined treatment with pegloticase + immunomodulation at two community rheumatology practices. Patients who began treatment with pegloticase and an immunomodulator in 2017 or later were included. The proportion of patients with sustained urate-lowering response (≥ 12 infusions received, SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion 12) was investigated. Renal function before and after therapy was also examined. Thirty-four patients were included. Before treatment, SU averaged 9.1 mg/dl and most-reported comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and chronic kidney disease (47%). All patients began using an immunomodulator before or at first pegloticase infusion (subcutaneous methotrexate [20 patients], oral methotrexate [9 patients], mycophenolate mofetil [3 patients], and azathioprine [2 patients]). On average, 14.6 infusions were administered over 28.5 weeks and overall response rate was 89%. Response rate varied among different immunomodulators: subcutaneous methotrexate: 93%, oral methotrexate: 89%, mycophenolate mofetil: 100%, azathioprine: 50%. On average, kidney function improved, with chronic kidney disease stage stability/improvement in 85% of patients. Nineteen patients (56%) experienced gout flares. No infusion reactions or infections were noted and no new safety concerns were identified. These real-world findings provide further support for administering immunomodulation as co-therapy to pegloticase.
RESUMO
Zinc protoporphyrin (ZnPP), a naturally occurring metalloprotoporphyrin (MPP), is currently under development as a chemotherapeutic agent although its mechanism is unclear. When tested against other MPPs, ZnPP was the most effective DNA synthesis and cellular proliferation inhibitor while promoting apoptosis in telomerase positive but not telomerase negative cells. Concurrently, ZnPP down-regulated telomerase expression and was the best overall inhibitor of telomerase activity in intact cells and cellular extracts with IC50 and EC50 values of ca 2.5 and 6 µM, respectively. The natural fluorescence properties of ZnPP enabled direct imaging in cellular fractions using non-denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis, western blots, and confocal fluorescence microscopy. ZnPP localized to large cellular complexes (>600 kD) that contained telomerase and dysskerin as confirmed with immunocomplex mobility shift, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblot analyses. Confocal fluorescence studies showed that ZnPP co-localized with telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and telomeres in the nucleus of synchronized S-phase cells. ZnPP also co-localized with TERT in the perinuclear regions of log phase cells but did not co-localize with telomeres on the ends of metaphase chromosomes, a site known to be devoid of telomerase complexes. Overall, these results suggest that ZnPP does not bind to telomeric sequences per se, but alternatively, interacts with other structural components of the telomerase complex to inhibit telomerase activity. In conclusion, ZnPP actively interferes with telomerase activity in neoplastic cells, thus promoting pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative properties. These data support further development of natural or synthetic protoporphyrins for use as chemotherapeutic agents to augment current treatment protocols for neoplastic disease.