RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung neoplasm. Despite surgical resection, it has a high relapse rate, accounting for 30-55% of all cases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on a customized gene panel and the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can help identify heterogeneity, stratify high-risk patients, and guide treatment decisions. In this descriptive study involving a small prospective cohort, we focus on the phenotypic characterization of CTCs, particularly concerning EZH2 expression (a member of the Polycomb Repression Complex 2), as well as on the mutation profiles of the tissue using a customized gene panel and their association with poor outcomes in NSCLC. METHODS: Isolation and characterization of EZH2 on CTCs were evaluated before surgical resection (CTC1) and one month after surgery (CTC2) in resectable NSCLC patients. Targeted NGS was performed using a customized 50-gene panel on tissue samples from a subset of patients. RESULTS: 76 patients with resectable NSCLC were recruited. The top mutated genes in the cohort included TP53, FLT1, MUC5AC, EGFR, and NLRP3. Pair of genes that had mutually exclusive mutations was TP53-RIN3, and pairs of genes with co-occurring mutations were CD163-TLR4, FGF10-FOXP2, ADAMTSL3-FLT1, ADAMTSL3-MUC5AC and MUC5AC-NLRP3. CTCs decreased significantly between the two time points CTC1 and CTC2 (p<0.0001), and CTCs+ patients with high EZH2 expression had an 87% increased risk of death (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating molecular profiling of tumors and CTC characterization can provide valuable insights into tumor heterogeneity and improve patient stratification for resectable NSCLC.
RESUMO
Background: Intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) is part of the fourth analgesic step. Evidence on the quality of life of patients with refractory chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) using these devices and their long-term outcomes is scarce. This study aims to evaluate patients with IDD to assess their HRQoL. Additionally, the study seeks to understand the patients' satisfaction with the treatment and changes in pain magnitude over time. Methods: Adult patients with CNCP and intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) were included. The study population was divided into two groups: less than and more than 15 years of treatment. HRQoL was analyzed using validated questionnaires. Pain reduction was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Results: The results indicate a poor HRQoL in IDD patients, with better scores in the group with ≥15 years of treatment. Pain reduction was similar in both groups, and patients reported a positive satisfaction level with the treatment. Conclusions: HRQoL in CNCP patients is severely affected. Long-term IDD patients have a similar or even better HRQoL in some respects compared to those with shorter follow-ups. IDD patients experienced pain reduction, with most feeling better or much better.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Treatment with LABA/LAMA is recommended in GOLD B patients. We hypothesized that triple therapy (LABA/LAMA/ICS) will be superior to LABA/LAMA in achieving and maintaining clinical control (CC), a composite outcome that considers both impact and disease stability in a subgroup of GOLD B patients (here termed GOLD B+ patients) characterized by: (1) remaining symptomatic (CAT≥10) despite regular LABA/LAMA therapy; (2) having suffered one moderate exacerbation in the previous year; and (3) having blood eosinophil counts (BEC) ≥150cells/µL. METHODS: The ANTES B+ study is a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized, pragmatic, controlled trial designed to test this hypothesis. It will randomize 1028 B+ patients to continue with their usual LABA/LAMA combination prescribed by their attending physician or to begin fluticasone furoate (FF) 92µg/umeclidinium (UMEC) 55µg/vilanterol (VI) 22µg in a single inhaler q.d. for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome will be the level of CC achieved. Secondary outcomes include the clinical important deterioration index (CID), annual rate of exacerbations, and FEV1. Exploratory objectives include the interaction of BEC and smoking status, all-cause mortality and proportion of patients on LABA/LAMA arm that switch therapy arms. Safety analysis include adverse events and incidence of pneumonia. RESULTS: The first patient was recruited on February 29, 2024; results are expected in the first quarter of 2026. CONCLUSIONS: The ANTES B+ study is the first to: (1) explore the efficacy and safety of triple therapy in a population of B+ COPD patients and (2) use a composite index (CC) as the primary result of a COPD trial.
Assuntos
Álcoois Benzílicos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administração & dosagem , Androstadienos/uso terapêutico , Androstadienos/administração & dosagem , Álcoois Benzílicos/uso terapêutico , Álcoois Benzílicos/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Clorobenzenos/uso terapêutico , Clorobenzenos/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eosinófilos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Quinuclidinas/uso terapêutico , Quinuclidinas/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare disorder associated with increased mortality and morbidity. There are currently two drugs approved for IPF but their safety and efficacy profile in real-world settings in Spain is not well understood. METHODS: An observational, multicentre, prospective study was carried out among patients with IPF who started treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib from 2015 to 2021. Data regarding clinical characteristics, drug adherence, safety profiles and clinical outcomes between these two drugs were collected. RESULTS: 232 patients were included in the analysis. There were no meaningful differences between both groups at baseline. Patients who started pirfenidone showed a decreased risk for treatment withdrawal compared with those starting nintedanib (HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.94; p=0.002)). Time to first adverse event and all-cause mortality was similar between study groups. Risk factors for withdrawal were female sex, diarrhoea and photosensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: in this real-world study, both pirfenidone and nintedanib showed similar efficacy profiles. Pirfenidone was associated with less treatment discontinuations due to side effects.
Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Indóis , Piridonas , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/mortalidade , Feminino , Masculino , Espanha , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antifibróticos/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisAssuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pneumonectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area.
Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Transtornos Respiratórios , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Transtornos Respiratórios/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospital workers have been the most frequently and severely affected professional group during the COVID-19 pandemic, and have a big impact on transmission. In this context, innovative tools are required to measure the symptoms compatible with COVID-19, the spread of infection, and testing capabilities within hospitals in real time. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and test an effective and user-friendly tool to identify and track symptoms compatible with COVID-19 in hospital workers. METHODS: We developed and pilot tested Hospital Epidemics Tracker (HEpiTracker), a newly designed app to track the spread of COVID-19 among hospital workers. Hospital staff in 9 hospital centers across 5 Spanish regions (Andalusia, Balearics, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid) were invited to download the app on their phones and to register their daily body temperature, COVID-19-compatible symptoms, and general health score, as well as any polymerase chain reaction and serological test results. RESULTS: A total of 477 hospital staff participated in the study between April 8 and June 2, 2020. Of note, both health-related (n=329) and non-health-related (n=148) professionals participated in the study; over two-thirds of participants (68.8%) were health workers (43.4% physicians and 25.4% nurses), while the proportion of non-health-related workers by center ranged from 40% to 85%. Most participants were female (n=323, 67.5%), with a mean age of 45.4 years (SD 10.6). Regarding smoking habits, 13.0% and 34.2% of participants were current or former smokers, respectively. The daily reporting of symptoms was highly variable across participating hospitals; although we observed a decline in adherence after an initial participation peak in some hospitals, other sites were characterized by low participation rates throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: HEpiTracker is an already available tool to monitor COVID-19 and other infectious diseases in hospital workers. This tool has already been tested in real conditions. HEpiTracker is available in Spanish, Portuguese, and English. It has the potential to become a customized asset to be used in future COVID-19 pandemic waves and other environments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04326400; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04326400.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Epidemias , Hospitais , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Aplicativos Móveis , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , Temperatura Corporal , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Revelação , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Projetos Piloto , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia , TelemedicinaRESUMO
Although the chronic presence of microorganisms in the airways of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) confers a poor outcome, no recommendations have been established in disease management guidelines on how to diagnose and treat these cases. In order to guide professionals, the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) has prepared a document which aims to answer questions on the clinical management of COPD patients in whom microorganisms are occasionally or habitually isolated. Since the available scientific evidence is too heterogeneous to use in the creation of a clinical practice guideline, we have drawn up a document based on existing scientific literature and clinical experience, addressing the definition of different clinical situations and their diagnosis and management. The text was drawn up by consensus and approved by a large group of respiratory medicine experts with extensive clinical and scientific experience in the field, and has been endorsed by the SEPAR Scientific Committee.
Assuntos
Bronquite Crônica , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Pneumologia , Consenso , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnósticoAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Listas de Espera , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas , Triagem , Suspensão de TratamentoAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Fatores Etários , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19 , Carcinoma Broncogênico/complicações , Carcinoma Broncogênico/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Broncogênico/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Broncogênico/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Pneumonectomia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Tempo para o TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of death all over the world. Diagnostic and therapeutic arsenals have improved in recent years, but we are unsure as to whether these advances have been transferred to clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in SCLC diagnostic processes and short-term survival rates between two recent cohorts. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted with patients diagnosed with SCLC (either at extensive or limited stages) in the 2011-2016 period. Patients were divided into two cohorts (2011-2013 and 2014-2016) and followed up for 1 year after diagnosis. RESULTS: Around 713 patients with lung cancer were selected, 134 of whom had SCLC (74 patients in the 2011-2013 cohort and 60 in the 2014-2016 cohort). We observed a chronological increase in the use of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) between the cohorts. Overall, short-term survival was similar between the two groups and improved survival was associated with age and limited stage. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in diagnostic process in SCLC have been observed towards a more precise stadification. Although short-term survival has not changed for SCLC, it is unclear that the real benefit of PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA is far from correct disease staging.
Assuntos
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/diagnóstico , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/mortalidade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Aim: This cross-sectional multicenter study was performed aimed at describing the clinical characteristics of women with COPD attended in routine daily practice in Spain. Methods and results: Of a total of 1610 consecutive patients diagnosed with COPD recruited in primary care centers and pneumology services throughout Spain over a 90-day period, 17.9% (n=286) were women, with a median age of 62 years. Differences in COPD phenotypes by sex were statistically significant (P = 0.002). Males as compared with females showed a higher prevalence of non-exacerbator (47.9% vs 42.2%) and exacerbator with chronic bronchitis (22.9% vs 18.8%) phenotypes, whereas the ACOS phenotype was more common among females (21.7% vs 12.9%). The mean (SD) CAT score was similar in men than in women (20.8 [9.0] vs 21.2 [8.7], P = 0.481), as well as the impact of the disease on the quality of life according to CAT scores of <5 (no impact), 5-9 (low), 10-20 (medium), >20 (high), and >30 (very high). Sex-related differences according to smoking status were statistically significant (P < 0.001), with a higher percentage of men as compared with women in the groups of current smokers and ex-smokers; never-smokers were higher in women (9.1%) than in men (0.6%). The mean number of comorbidities was 2.01 (1.43) (95% CI 1.93-2.09) in males and 1.99 (1.42) (95% CI 1.83-2.16) (P = 0.930) in females, but cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure) were more frequent in men, whereas metabolic disorders (osteoporosis) were more frequent in women. Conclusion: This study highlights the impact of COPD in women and the importance of continuing sex-based research in tobacco-related respiratory diseases.
Assuntos
Bronquite Crônica/fisiopatologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Bronquite Crônica/diagnóstico , Bronquite Crônica/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Enfisema Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fumantes , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Biópsia Líquida/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/patologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/análise , Líquidos Corporais/química , Humanos , Pulmão/patologia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/sangue , Pneumologia , Transtornos Respiratórios/diagnóstico , Transtornos Respiratórios/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary parenchymal destruction is consequence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which results in degradation of the extracellular matrix and the appearance of peripheral pulmonary cells. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of the detection and isolation of Circulating Pulmonary Cells (CPCs) in peripheral blood of patients with COPD. METHODS: 17 COPD patients were enrolled in this prospective study to isolate CPCs. Peripheral blood samples for CPC analysis were processed using positive immunomagnetic methods combined with a double immunocytochemistry. Two antibodies, anti-cytokeratin and anti-CD44v6 were used to confirm the epithelial nature of the isolated cells and their lung origin respectively. RESULTS: CK/CD44v6 positive CPCs were identified in 6 of 17 COPD patients (35.2% of the total) (range: 1-2 cells). No CPCs were detected in any of the 10 healthy volunteers. The COPD CPCs + patients showed a trend towards greater severity of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggest the feasibility to detect CPCs in peripheral blood of patients with COPD and its potential use as prognostic marker.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/análise , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Estudos Transversais , Progressão da Doença , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Líquida/métodos , Pulmão/metabolismo , Pulmão/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/sangue , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/sangue , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of death all over the world. Diagnostic and therapeutic arsenals have improved in recent years, but we are unsure as to whether these advances have been transferred to clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in NSCLC diagnostic processes and short-term survival rates between two recent cohorts. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted with patients diagnosed with NSCLC in the period of 2011-2016. Patients were divided into two cohorts (2011-2013 and 2014-2016), and monitored for up to 1 year after diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 713 patients with lung cancer were selected, 500 of whom had NSCLC (222 patients in the 2011-2013 cohort, and 278 in the 2014-2016 cohort). We observed a chronological increase in the use of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and ultrasound-guided transthoracic puncture (US-TTP) between the cohorts. Overall short-term survival was similar between the two groups, both for locally and for advanced disease. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) was the only therapeutic factor associated with an improved likelihood of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in diagnostic process in NSCLC have been observed towards a more precise stratification. Although short-term survival has not changed for advanced NSCLC, some of the newer therapeutic options are associated with increased survival in real-world scenarios.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurements differentiate COPD phenotypes from asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). To date, no study has been conducted to determine whether alveolar and bronchial components differ in this group of patients. METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional study recruiting ambulatory COPD patients. FENO was measured, differentiating alveolar (CANO) from bronchial (JawNO) components using a multiple-flow technique. CANO and JawNO values were compared between eosinophilic COPD patients (defined as ≥ 300 eosinophils/µL in peripheral blood test, or ≥ 2% eosinophils or ≥ 3% eosinophils), and a linear regression analysis was performed to determine clinical and biological variables related to these measurements. RESULTS: 73 COPD patients were included in the study. Eosinophil counts were associated with increased values of CANO and JawNO (for the latter only the association with ≥ 300 or ≥ 3% eosinophils was significant). CANO was also associated with CRP, and JawNO with smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD and ACO characteristics show increased inflammation in the large and small airways. CANO and JawNO are associated with clinical and biological variables.
Assuntos
Asma/complicações , Asma/metabolismo , Brônquios/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico/análise , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Alvéolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/metabolismo , Idoso , Testes Respiratórios , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of COPD phenotypes at a national level and to determine their geographic distribution among different autonomous communities in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,610 patients (82% men, median age 67 years) recruited in primary care centers and pneumology services participated in an observational, cross-sectional, and multicenter study. Phenotypes evaluated were the non-exacerbator phenotype, the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS), the exacerbator phenotype with emphysema, and the exacerbator phenotype with chronic bronchitis. RESULTS: The non-exacerbator phenotype was the most common (46.7%) followed by exacerbator with chronic bronchitis (22.4%) and exacerbator with emphysema (16.4%). The ACOS phenotype accounted for the lowest rate (14.5%). For each phenotype, the highest prevalence rates were concentrated in two or three autonomous communities, with relatively similar rates for the remaining regions. Overall prevalence rates were higher for the non-exacerbator and the exacerbator with chronic bronchitis phenotypes than for ACOS and the exacerbator with chronic bronchitis phenotypes. Differences in the distribution of COPD phenotypes according to gender, age, physician specialty, smoking habit, number of comorbidities, quality of life assessed with the COPD Assessment Test, and BODEx index (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exacerbations) were all statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Differences in the prevalence rates of COPD phenotypes among the Spanish autonomous communities have been documented. Mapping the distribution of COPD phenotypes is useful to highlight regional differences as starting point for comparisons across time. This geographic analysis provides health-care planners a valuable platform to assess changes in COPD burden at nationwide and regional levels.
Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Bronquite Crônica/epidemiologia , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatologia , Bronquite Crônica/diagnóstico , Bronquite Crônica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Transversais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: EPOCONSUL is the first national audit to analyze medical care for COPD in pulmonology departments in Spain. The main objective was to perform a retrospective analysis to determine the distribution of GesEPOC 2017 COPD risk levels and to evaluate clinical activity according to the new recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional clinical audit in which consecutive COPD cases were recruited over one year. The study evaluated risk and clinical phenotype according to GesEPOC 2017, and their correlation with the clinical interventions employed. RESULTS: The most common risk category was high risk (79.8% versus 20.2%; p < 0.001), characterized by a higher level of severity on BODE and BODEx indexes, and a higher comorbidity burden. The most common phenotype was non-exacerbator. The most commonly used treatment in low-risk patients was bronchodilator monotherapy (34.8%) and triple therapy in high-risk patients (53.7%). High risk was most frequently characterized by phenotype (57.6% versus 52%; p = 0.014) and pulmonary function test results: lung volume (47.7% versus 35.8%; p < 0.001), lung diffusion (51.4% versus 42.1%; p < 0.001) and walk test (37.8% versus 15.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated in pulmonology departments were high-risk and non-exacerbator phenotype. Clinical interventions differed according to risk level and mainly followed GesEPOC recommendations, although there is significant room for improvement.
Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Idoso , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Auditoria Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Oxigenoterapia , Fenótipo , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Terapia Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Changes in lung cancer has been characterized by the increase of cases among women and the increase in adenocarcinomas among other histological subtypes. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of cases diagnosed with lung cancer in Hospital Virgen de las Nieves (Spain) from 1990 to 2010, based on five variables (age, sex, smoking, histology and pathological anatomy). The study establishes associations between these variables and compares the results with the literature. RESULTS: 2,026 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer in this period; 1,838 were males (90.7%) and 188 women (9.3%); 1,892 patients (93.4%) were smokers or ex-smokers and 134 (6.6%) had never smoked; the most frequent non-small cell histology types were squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma and it was the most frequent neoplasia in women and were associated with a lower tobacco consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The large majority of lung cancer cases is associated with a history of smoking tobacco and there are histopathological differences according to gender and cumulative tobacco smoke load.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Appropriate timing for dual bronchodilator therapy initiation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management is uncertain. Combination therapy is recommended as step-up from monotherapy or first-line treatment in patients with persistent symptoms. In this setting, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) demonstrated improved lung function and reduced rescue medication use over tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO). This subgroup analysis explored efficacy differences between these combinations in patients naïve to COPD maintenance therapy before study entry. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of an 8-week, randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, two-period crossover study (204990; NCT02799784) comparing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg and TIO/OLO 5/5 mcg, focused on maintenance-naïve (MN) patients with moderate COPD and persistent symptoms (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score ≥ 2). Change from baseline (CFB) in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), percentage of FEV1 responders (CFB ≥ 100 ml), rescue medication use and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: The MN population comprised 63% of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (148/236 patients) and had similar baseline demographics. At week 8, adjusted mean (standard error) improvements in trough FEV1 from baseline were clinically meaningful for both combinations (UMEC/VI: 167 [17] ml; TIO/OLO 110 [18] ml; adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 57 [23-92] ml; p = 0.001; %CFB: 11 vs. 8%). Proportion of FEV1 responders was greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO at week 8 (60 vs. 42%; odds ratio [95% CI] 1.90 [1.12-3.22]; p = 0.018). Reduction in rescue medication use was 0.20 (95% CI 0.07-0.34) puffs/day greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO over weeks 1-8 (p = 0.003). Adverse events incidence was similar (UMEC/VI: 24%; TIO/OLO: 29%). CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight that the efficacy difference between UMEC/VI and TIO/OLO demonstrated in the ITT population is maintained in MN patients. Greater lung function improvements with UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO were accompanied by symptom improvements, as reflected in a significantly lower need for supplemental rescue medication. FUNDING: GSK. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02799784.