Gene expression profiles following intracoronary injection of mesenchymal stromal cells using a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AIMS: We evaluated the therapeutic potential of injection of in vitro differentiated bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) using a swine model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocardial infarction was induced by coronary occlusion. Three groups (n = 5 each) were analyzed: one group received an injection of 17.8 ± 9.3 × 10(6) 5-azacytidine-treated allogeneic MSC 1 month after infarction; a placebo group received an injection of medium; and controls were kept untreated. After 4 weeks, heart samples were taken from three infarcted areas, interventricular septa, ventricles and atria. Gene expression profiles of genes related to contractility (Serca2a), fibrosis (Col1a1), cardiomyogenesis (Mef2c, Gata4 and Nkx2.5) and mobilization of stem cells (Sdf1, Cxcr4 and c-kit) were compared by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Gene expression profiles varied in different heart areas. Thus Serca2a expression was reduced in infarcted groups in all heart regions except for the left ventricles, where Col1a1 was overexpressed. The expression of genes related to cardiomyogenesis decreased in the infarcted zones and left atria compared with healthy hearts. Interestingly, increased expression of Cxcr4 was detected in infarcted regions of MSC-treated pigs compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Infarction induced changes in expression of genes involved in various biologic processes. Genes involved in cardiomyogenesis were downregulated in the left atrium. The intracoronary injection of MSC resulted in localized changes in the expression of Cxcr4.

Primary cardiac rhabdomyosarcoma causing obstruction to the right ventricular outflow.

A 72-year-old man presented with worsening shortness of breath and a systolic murmur. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiograms revealed a huge mass (70 x 30 mm) obliterating the right ventricular outflow tract, with a peak transpulmonary gradient of 128 mmHg. Pathological examination confirmed the mass to be a primary cardiac rhabdomyosarcoma originating from the pulmonary valve.

Cardiac syndrome X. Diagnosis, pathogenesis and management.

Patients with cardiac syndrome X (typical chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms) represent a heterogeneous syndrome, which encompasses different pathogenic mechanisms. Although symptoms in most patients with cardiac syndrome X are non-cardiac, a sizable proportion of them have angina pectoris due to transient myocardial ischemia. Thus radionuclide myocardial perfusion defects, coronary sinus oxygen saturation abnormalities and pH changes, myocardial lactate production and stress-induced alterations of cardiac high energy phosphate suggest an ischemic origin of symptoms in at least a proportion of patients with cardiac syndrome X. Microvascular abnormalities, caused by endothelial dysfunction, appear to be responsible for myocardial ischemia in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Endothelial dysfunction is likely to be multifactorial in these patients and it is conceivable that risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking can contribute to its development. Most patients with cardiac syndrome X are postmenopausal women and estrogen deficiency has been therefore proposed as a pathogenic factor in female patients. Additional factors such as abnormal pain perception may contribute to the pathogenesis of chest pain in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. Although prognosis is good regarding survival, patients with cardiac syndrome X have an impaired quality of life. Management of this syndrome represents a major challenge to the treating physician. Understanding the mechanism underlying the condition is of vital importance for patient management. Thus diagnostic tests should aim at identifying the cause of the symptoms in the individual patient, i.e. myocardial ischemia, increased pain perception, abnormalities of adrenergic tone, non-cardiac mechanisms, etc. Moreover, it is important to bear in mind that treatment of cardiac syndrome X should be mainly directed towards improving quality of life, as prognosis is usually good in these patients. Conventional antianginal agents such nitrates, calcium channel antagonists, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and nicorandil are effective particularly in patients in whom chest pain and ECG changes are clearly suggestive of myocardial ischemia and in those with objective documentation of ischemia. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to be useful in syndrome X patients with increased adrenergic tone, borderline systemic hypertension, and those with documented endothelial dysfunction. Analgesic interventions of different sorts have been proposed based on the hypothesis that somatic and visceral perception of pain is altered in cardiac syndrome X patients. Pharmacological agents such as imipramine and aminophylline, and neural electrical stimulation techniques have been assessed in recent years with encouraging results. Psychological treatment, particularly cognitive therapy, appears to be useful in defined patient subsets. Relaxation techniques such as transcendental meditation have been successfully used in small studies and shown to improve not only chest pain but also exercise-induced ST segment changes. Reports indicate that these techniques improve quality of life.