Reporting regression in primary cutaneous melanoma. Part 1: history, histological criteria and pathogenesis.

Regression is an important histopathological parameter reported for the diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma. Histological regression is defined by The College of American Pathologists as the replacement of tumour cells by lymphocytic inflammation, with attenuation of the epidermis, and nonlaminated dermal fibrosis with inflammatory cells, melanophagocytosis and telangiectasia. Histological regression may be reported as absent versus present and, if present, as complete, partial or segmental. The stages of histological regression are early, intermediate and late, depending on the extent of histological inflammation and fibrosis. Regression occurs when the host's immune system attacks primary melanocytic tumour cells via tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, resulting in fibrosis. The immunological mechanisms driving complete, partial and segmental regression may vary. In this first part of this two-part review, we review the history, histological criteria and pathogenesis of regression in primary cutaneous melanoma, while in Part 2 we will review the effect of histological regression on prognosis, evaluation and management.

Reporting regression in primary cutaneous melanoma. Part 2: prognosis, evaluation and management.

The effect of histological regression on patient prognosis for primary cutaneous melanoma is controversial. Some authors hypothesize that regression indicates a robust systemic immune response and may decrease risk of metastasis. Others argue that histological regression calls into question a T0 diagnosis because there may have been an invasive component of the melanoma that is no longer visible but is still active. The literature to date does not suggest that histological regression is associated with increased risk of positive sentinel lymph node status, metastasis or increased risk of mortality. Thus, the presence of histological regression should not change patient staging, evaluation or management. The criteria used for reporting regression have varied dramatically across studies, and standardized reporting is needed to foster evidence-based practices in the future.