L-Asparaginase Conjugates from the Hyperthermophilic Archaea Thermococcus sibiricus with Improved Biocatalytic Properties.

This study investigated the effect of polycationic and uncharged polymers (and oligomers) on the catalytic parameters and thermostability of L-asparaginase from Thermococcus sibiricus (TsA). This enzyme has potential applications in the food industry to decrease the formation of carcinogenic acrylamide during the processing of carbohydrate-containing products. Conjugation with the polyamines polyethylenimine and spermine (PEI and Spm) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) did not significantly affect the secondary structure of the enzyme. PEG contributes to the stabilization of the dimeric form of TsA, as shown by HPLC. Furthermore, neither polyamines nor PEG significantly affected the binding of the L-Asn substrate to TsA. The conjugates showed greater maximum activity at pH 7.5 and 85 °C, 10-50% more than for native TsA. The pH optima for both TsA-PEI and TsA-Spm conjugates were shifted to lower pH ranges from pH 10 (for the native enzyme) to pH 8.0. Additionally, the TsA-Spm conjugate exhibited the highest activity at pH 6.5-9.0 among all the samples. Furthermore, the temperature optimum for activity at pH 7.5 shifted from 90-95 °C to 80-85 °C for the conjugates. The thermal inactivation mechanism of TsA-PEG appeared to change, and no aggregation was observed in contrast to that of the native enzyme. This was visually confirmed and supported by the analysis of the CD spectra, which remained almost unchanged after heating the conjugate solution. These results suggest that TsA-PEG may be a more stable form of TsA, making it a potentially more suitable option for industrial use.

Improvement of Biocatalytic Properties and Cytotoxic Activity of L-Asparaginase from Rhodospirillum rubrum by Conjugation with Chitosan-Based Cationic Polyelectrolytes.

L-asparaginases (L-ASNases, EC 3.5.1.1) are a family of enzymes that are widely used for the treatment of lymphoblastic leukemias. L-ASNase from Rhodospirillum rubrum (RrA) has a low molecular weight, low glutaminase activity, and low immunogenicity, making it a promising enzyme for antitumor drug development. In our work, the complex formation and covalent conjugation of the enzyme with synthetic or natural polycationic polymers was studied. Among non-covalent polyelectrolyte complexes (PEC), polyethyleneimine (PEI) yielded the highest effect on RrA, increasing its activity by 30%. The RrA-PEI complex had increased stability to trypsinolysis, with an inactivation constant decrease up to 10-fold compared to that of the native enzyme. The covalent conjugation of RrA with chitosan-PEI, chitosan-polyethylene glycol (chitosan-PEG), and chitosan-glycol resulted in an increase in the specific activity of L-asparagine (up to 30%). RrA-chitosan-PEG demonstrated dramatically (by 60%) increased cytotoxic activity for human chronic myeloma leukemia K562 cells in comparison to the native enzyme. The antiproliferative activity of RrA and its conjugates was significantly higher (up to 50%) than for that of the commercially available EcA at the same concentration. The results of this study demonstrated that RrA conjugates with polycations can become a promising strategy for antitumor drug development.

Molecular Analysis of L-Asparaginases for Clarification of the Mechanism of Action and Optimization of Pharmacological Functions.

L-asparaginases (EC 3.5.1.1) are a family of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of L-asparagine to L-aspartic acid and ammonia. These proteins with different biochemical, physicochemical and pharmacological properties are found in many organisms, including bacteria, fungi, algae, plants and mammals. To date, asparaginases from E. coli and Dickeya dadantii (formerly known as Erwinia chrysanthemi) are widely used in hematology for the treatment of lymphoblastic leukemias. However, their medical use is limited by side effects associated with the ability of these enzymes to hydrolyze L-glutamine, as well as the development of immune reactions. To solve these issues, gene-editing methods to introduce amino-acid substitutions of the enzyme are implemented. In this review, we focused on molecular analysis of the mechanism of enzyme action and to optimize the antitumor activity.

Comparative immunogenicity and structural analysis of epitopes of different bacterial L-asparaginases.

BACKGROUND: E.coli type II L-asparaginase is widely used for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, serious side effects such as allergic or hypersensitivity reactions are common for L-asparaginase treatment. Methods for minimizing immune response on L-asparaginase treatment in human include bioengeneering of less immunogenic version of the enzyme or utilizing the homologous enzymes of different origin. To rationalize these approaches we compared immunogenicity of L-asparaginases from five bacterial organisms and performed sequence-structure analysis of the presumable epitope regions. METHODS: IgG and IgM immune response in C57B16 mice after immunization with Wollinella succinogenes type II (WsA), Yersinia pseudotuberculosis type II (YpA), Erwinia carotovora type II (EwA), and Rhodospirillum rubrum type I (RrA) and Escherichia coli type II (EcA) L-asparaginases was evaluated using standard ELISA method. The comparative bioinformatics analysis of structure and sequence of the bacterial L-asparaginases presumable epitope regions was performed. RESULTS: We showed different immunogenic properties of five studied L-asparaginases and confirmed the possibility of replacement of EcA with L-asparaginase from different origin as a second-line treatment. Studied L-asparaginases might be placed in the following order based on the immunogenicity level: YpA > RrA, WsA ≥ EwA > EcA. Most significant cross-immunogenicity was shown between EcA and YpA. We propose that a long N-terminus of YpA enzyme enriched with charged aminoacids and tryptophan could be a reason of higher immunogenicity of YpA in comparison with other considered enzymes. Although the recognized structural and sequence differences in putative epitope regions among five considered L-asparaginases does not fully explain experimental observation of the immunogenicity of the enzymes, the performed analysis set the foundation for further research in this direction. CONCLUSIONS: The performed studies showed different immunogenic properties of L-asparaginases and confirmed the possibility of replacement of EcA with L-asparaginase from different origin. The preferable enzymes for the second line treatment are WsA, RrA, or EwA.