RESUMO
Objectives: Pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is recommended in the vast majority of trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize current dosing practices and timing of initiation of pharmacological VTE chemoprophylaxis at trauma centers. Methods: This was an international, cross-sectional survey of trauma providers. The survey was sponsored by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) and distributed to AAST members. The survey included 38 questions about practitioner demographics, experience, level and location of trauma center, and individual/site-specific practices regarding the dosing, selection, and timing of initiation of pharmacological VTE chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients. Results: One hundred eighteen trauma providers responded (estimated response rate 6.9%). Most respondents were at level 1 trauma centers (100/118; 84.7%) and had >10 years of experience (73/118; 61.9%). While multiple dosing regimens were used, the most common dose reported was enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours (80/118; 67.8%). The majority of respondents (88/118; 74.6%) indicated adjusting the dose in patients with obesity. Seventy-eight (66.1%) routinely use antifactor Xa levels to guide dosing. Respondents at academic institutions were more likely to use guideline-directed dosing (based on the Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma and the Western Trauma Association guidelines) of VTE chemoprophylaxis compared with those at non-academic centers (86.2% vs 62.5%; p=0.0158) and guideline-directed dosing was reported more often if the trauma team included a clinical pharmacist (88.2% vs 69.0%; p=0.0142). Wide variability in initial timing of VTE chemoprophylaxis after traumatic brain injury, solid organ injury, and spinal cord injuries was found. Conclusions: A high degree of variability exists in prescribing and monitoring practices for the prevention of VTE in trauma patients. Clinical pharmacists may be helpful on trauma teams to optimize dosing and increase prescribing of guideline-concordant VTE chemoprophylaxis.
RESUMO
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is described in the medical literature but rarely seen among acutely ill trauma patients. A 44-year-old man with burns to the hands and back after a chemical explosion was transported to an outside facility where he received treatment for presumed acute coronary syndrome after developing ventricular tachycardia and elevated serum troponins after the exposure. His cardiac catheterization was unremarkable, but an echocardiogram revealed severe cardiomyopathy, and he was also in multisystem organ failure. He was transferred to our facility after hospital day 2 for treatment of his multisystem organ failure and 2% total body surface area burns. His laboratory results were remarkable for a creatine kinase of >100 000 units/L, and he required 14 g of intravenous calcium. Upon further investigation, the patient reported taking ziprasidone for his bipolar disorder, and he had a core temperature of 103.5 °F on his initial presentation to the outside facility. As he convalesced, the unifying diagnosis was NMS. NMS is a side effect of antipsychotic therapy and is manifested by hyperpyrexia, rigidity, autonomic instability, and altered consciousness. An elevated creatine kinase >100 000 units/L is almost pathognomonic for NMS. Patients can also present with leukocytosis, organ failure, and electrolyte disturbances including hypocalcemia. We hypothesized that dehydration, the warm environmental conditions at our patient's job, and immense stress resulting in a catecholamine surge following his trauma were inciting triggers to this event. This case highlights the importance of considering alternate diagnoses in patients whose clinical presentation does not fit the most "obvious cause."