The Impact of Laparoscopic Myomectomy on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the impact of laparoscopic myomectomy techniques on pregnancy outcomes, with a specific focus on the correlation between the type of suture used during the procedure and the incidence of uterine rupture. Additionally, the study aims to examine how the localization and size of myomas, key factors in laparoscopic myomectomy, may influence fertility outcomes. DATA SOURCES: extensive searches were conducted using MDPI, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from 2008 to November 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The study involved women of reproductive age diagnosed with fibroids who underwent surgical removal of fibroids using either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The evaluation of pregnancy outcomes focused on indicators such as live birth rates, miscarriage rates, stillbirth rates, premature delivery rates, and cases of uterine rupture. Quality assessment was systematically performed by employing the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools, with the subsequent formulation of clinical recommendations that were meticulously graded in accordance with the robustness of the underlying evidence. RESULTS: The pregnancy outcomes post-myoma treatment, as reflected in one of the presented tables, show a promising number of pregnancies and live births, but also indicate the potential risks of miscarriages and preterm births. The diversity in outcomes observed among various studies underscores the imperative for tailored patient care, as well as the necessity for additional research aimed at optimizing fertility and pregnancy outcomes following myoma treatment. CONCLUSION: This study offers insights into the criteria for patient selection and intraoperative methodologies specifically related to laparoscopic myomectomy. To enhance our understanding of the associations between fibroid characteristics (location, size) and reproductive outcomes, additional research is warranted, particularly through well-designed clinical trials.

The Efficiency of a Uterine Isthmus Tourniquet in Minimizing Blood Loss during a Myomectomy-A Prospective Study.

Background and Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of using a peri-cervical tourniquet in reducing blood loss during a laparoscopic myomectomy. Materials and Methods: This prospective study evaluated the impact of performing a concomitant tourniquet placement during a laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). A total of 60 patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups: 30 patients who underwent an LM with a tourniquet placement (the TLM group) and 30 patients who benefited from a standard LM (the SLM group). This study's main objective was to evaluate the impact of tourniquet use on perioperative blood loss, which is quantified as the difference in the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels (Delta Hb) and the postoperative blood transfusion rate. Results: The mean Delta Hb was statistically lower in the TLM group compared to the SLM group: 1.38 g/dL vs. 2.41 g/dL (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative iron perfusion in the TLM group was significantly lower compared to the SLM group (4 vs. 13 patients; p = 0.02). All four patients that required a blood transfusion were from the SLM group. On average, the peri-cervical tourniquet fastening time was 10.62 min (between 7 and 15 min), with no significant impact on the overall operative time: 98.50 min for the TLM group compared to 94.66 min for the SLM group. Conclusions: Fastening a tourniquet during a laparoscopic myomectomy is a valuable technique to effectively control intraoperative bleeding and enhance surgical outcomes.

Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the follow-up results of a sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) technique for laparoscopic bilateral fixation of the vagina to the iliopectineal ligament via a PVDF-mesh (laparoscopic pectopexy technique, LP) in terms of cure rate and postoperative complications rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study included 160 patients diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse stage II-IV according to the POP-Q system. Eighty-two patients (51.25%) underwent vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation and seventy-eight patients (48.75%) underwent the laparoscopic pectopexy procedure. RESULTS: The cure rate was high in both groups, 95.12% of the patients (78 out of 82) in the SSLF group and 93.59% of the patients (73 out of 78) in the LP group were cured post surgery, leading to an overall cure rate of 151 out of 160 patients. Pelvic pain was present in 5.00% of all patients, but was notably more frequent in the SSLF group (7, 8.54%) than in the LP group (1, 1.28%). Dyspareunia occurred in 4.37% of all patients, slightly more frequently in the SSLF group (6, 7.32%) than the LP group (1, 1.28%), but without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic pectopexy procedure has comparably positive follow-up results with the conventional sacrospinous ligament fixation procedure. Both SSLF and LP are effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, with favorable anatomical and subjective results, a high cure rate and low rates of serious postoperative complications.