2D antiscatter grid and scatter sampling based CBCT method for online dose calculations during CBCT guided radiation therapy of pelvis.

BACKGROUND: Online dose calculations before the delivery of radiation treatments have applications in dose delivery verification, online adaptation of treatment plans, and simulation-free treatment planning. While dose calculations by directly utilizing CBCT images are desired, dosimetric accuracy can be compromised due to relatively lower HU accuracy in CBCT images. PURPOSE: In this work, we propose a novel CBCT imaging pipeline to enhance the accuracy of CBCT-based dose calculations in the pelvis region. Our approach aims to improve the HU accuracy in CBCT images, thereby improving the overall accuracy of CBCT-based dose calculations prior to radiation treatment delivery. METHODS: An in-house developed quantitative CBCT pipeline was implemented to address the CBCT raw data contamination problem. The pipeline combines algorithmic data correction strategies and 2D antiscatter grid-based scatter rejection to achieve high CT number accuracy. To evaluate the effect of the quantitative CBCT pipeline on CBCT-based dose calculations, phantoms mimicking pelvis anatomy were scanned using a linac-mounted CBCT system, and a gold standard multidetector CT used for treatment planning (pCT). A total of 20 intensity-modulated treatment plans were generated for five targets, using 6 and 10 MV flattening filter-free beams, and utilizing small and large pelvis phantom images. For each treatment plan, four different dose calculations were performed using pCT images and three CBCT imaging configurations: quantitative CBCT, clinical CBCT protocol, and a high-performance 1D antiscatter grid (1D ASG). Subsequently, dosimetric accuracy was evaluated for both targets and organs at risk as a function of patient size, target location, beam energy, and CBCT imaging configuration. RESULTS: When compared to the gold-standard pCT, dosimetric errors in quantitative CBCT-based dose calculations were not significant across all phantom sizes, beam energies, and treatment sites. The largest error observed was 0.6% among all dose volume histogram metrics and evaluated dose calculations. In contrast, dosimetric errors reached up to 7% and 97% in clinical CBCT and high-performance ASG CBCT-based treatment plans, respectively. The largest dosimetric errors were observed in bony targets in the large phantom treated with 6 MV beams. The trends of dosimetric errors in organs at risk were similar to those observed in the targets. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed quantitative CBCT pipeline has the potential to provide comparable dose calculation accuracy to the gold-standard planning CT in photon radiation therapy for the abdomen and pelvis. These robust dose calculations could eliminate the need for density overrides in CBCT images and enable direct utilization of CBCT images for dose delivery monitoring or online treatment plan adaptations before the delivery of radiation treatments.

A 2D antiscatter grid and scatter sampling based CBCT method for online dose calculations during CBCT guided radiation therapy of pelvis.

Online dose calculations before radiation treatment have applications in dose delivery verification, plan adaptation, and treatment planning. We propose a novel CBCT imaging pipeline to enhance accuracy. Our approach aims to improve HU accuracy in CBCT images for more precise dose calculations. A quantitative CBCT pipeline was implemented, combining data correction strategies and scatter rejection, achieving high CT number accuracy. We evaluated the pipeline's effect using pelvis anatomy phantoms and found that dosimetric errors in quantitative CBCT-based dose calculations were minimal. In contrast, clinical CBCT and high-performance ASG CBCT-based plans showed significant errors. The proposed quantitative CBCT pipeline offers comparable dose calculation accuracy to the gold-standard planning CT, eliminating the need for density overrides and enabling precise dose delivery monitoring or online plan adaptations in radiation therapy.

Evaluation of scatter rejection and correction performance of 2D antiscatter grids in cone beam computed tomography.

PURPOSE: We have been investigating two-dimensional (2D) antiscatter grids (2D ASGs) to reduce scatter fluence and improve image quality in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this work, two different aspects of 2D ASGs, their scatter rejection and correction capability, were investigated in CBCT experiments. To correct residual scatter transmitted through the 2D ASG, it was used as a scatter measurement device with a novel method: grid-based scatter sampling. METHODS: Three focused 2D ASG prototypes with grid ratios of 8, 12, and 16 were developed for linac-mounted offset detector CBCT geometry. In the first phase, 2D ASGs were used as a scatter rejection device, and the effect of grid ratio on CT number accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluated in CBCT images. In the second phase, a grid-based scatter sampling method which exploits the signal modulation characteristics of the 2D ASG's septal shadows to measure and correct residual scatter transmitted through the grid was implemented. To evaluate CT number accuracy, the percent change in CT numbers was measured by changing the phantom from head to pelvis size and configuration. RESULTS: When 2D ASG was used as a scatter rejection device, CT number accuracy increased and the CT number variation due to change in phantom dimensions was reduced from 23% to 2-6%. A grid ratio of 16 yielded the lowest CT number variation. All three 2D ASGs yielded improvement in CNR, up to a factor of two in pelvis-sized phantoms. When 2D ASG prototypes were used for both scatter rejection and correction, CT number variations were reduced further, to 1.3-2.6%. In comparisons with a clinical CBCT system and a high-performance radiographic ASG, 2D ASG provided higher CT number accuracy under the same imaging conditions. CONCLUSIONS: When 2D ASG is used solely as a scatter rejection device, substantial improvement in CT number accuracy can be achieved by increasing the grid ratio. Two-dimensional ASGs also provided significant CNR improvement even at lower grid ratios. Two-dimensional ASGs used in conjunction with the grid-based scatter sampling method provided further improvement in CT number accuracy, irrespective of the grid ratio, while preserving 2D ASGs' capacity to improve CNR. The combined effect of scatter rejection and residual scatter correction by 2D ASG may accelerate implementation of new techniques in CBCT that require high quantitative accuracy, such as radiotherapy dose calculation and dual energy CBCT.

Effect of grid geometry on the transmission properties of 2D grids for flat detectors in CBCT.

To suppress scatter in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), two-dimensional antiscatter grids (2D grid) have been recently proposed. In this work, we developed several grid prototypes with higher grid ratios and smaller grid pitches than previous designs, and quantified their primary and scatter transmission properties in the context of CBCT for radiation therapy. Three focused 2D grid prototypes were developed with grid ratios at 12 and 16, and grid pitches at 2 and 3 mm. Their scatter transmission properties were measured between 80-140 kVp, and benchmarked against a high performance radiographic grid (1D grid) using a Varian TrueBeam CBCT system. The effect of source-grid misalignment on the primary transmission and the improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also evaluated. Changing the grid pitch from two to three mm increased the average primary transmission from 84% to 89%. Maximum scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) with grid ratio of 12 was 0.3, and increasing the grid ratio to 16 reduced SPR by 30%. A 10 mm misalignment in 2D grid position led to a 6%-8% reduction in average primary transmission, and reduction was more pronounced for the higher grid ratio. 2D grids provided up to factor of seven lower SPR and 21% better primary transmission than the 1D grid, and their scatter transmission exhibited lower energy dependence. While 2D grids provided up to factor of 2.3 higher CNR improvement, a significant variation in CNR improvement was not observed among different grid pitch and ratios. In summary, grid ratio of 16 and grid pitch of 2 mm can keep SPRs below 0.2 even in high scatter conditions, while keeping primary transmission fractions above 80%, key benefits of the investigated 2D grids in improving image quality of CBCT. However, such grids require precise alignment in source-grid geometry during CBCT acquisitions. This study also implies that 2D grids can provide substantially better scatter suppression and primary transmission than high-performance 1D grids currently available.

Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.

AIM: High fraction of scattered radiation in cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging degrades CT number accuracy and visualization of low contrast objects. To suppress scatter in CBCT projections, we developed a focused, two-dimensional antiscatter grid (2DASG) prototype. In this work, we report on the primary and scatter transmission characteristics of the 2DASG prototype aimed for linac mounted, offset detector geometry CBCT systems in radiation therapy, and compared its performance to a conventional one-dimensional ASG (1DASG). METHODS: The 2DASG is an array of through-holes separated by 0.1 mm septa that was fabricated from tungsten using additive manufacturing techniques. Through-holes' focusing geometry was designed for offset detector CBCT in Varian TrueBeam system. Two types of ASGs were evaluated: (a) a conventional 1DASG with a grid ratio of 10, (b) the 2DASG prototype with a grid ratio of 8.2. To assess the scatter suppression performance of both ASGs, Scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) and scatter transmission fraction (Ts) were measured using the beam stop method. Scatter and primary intensities were modulated by varying the phantom thickness between 10 and 40 cm. Additionally, the effect of air gap and bow tie (BT) filter on SPR and Ts were evaluated. Average primary transmission fraction (TP ) and pixel specific primary transmission were also measured for both ASGs. To assess the effect of transmission characteristics on projection image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR improvement factor was calculated. Improvement in contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was demonstrated using a low contrast object. RESULTS: In comparison to 1DASG, 2DASG reduced SPRs by a factor of 3 to 6 across the range of phantom setups investigated. Ts values for 1D and 2DASGs were in the range of 21 to 29%, and 5 to 14% respectively. 2DASG continued to provide lower SPR and Ts at increased air gap and with BT filter. Tp of 1D and 2DASGs were 70.6% and 84.7% respectively. Due to the septal shadow of the 2DASG, its pixel specific primary transmission values varied between 32.5% and 99.1%. With respect to 1DASG, 2DASG provided up to factor of 1.7 more improvement in SNR across the SPR range investigated. Moreover, 2DASG provided improved visualization of low contrast objects with respect to 1DASG and NOASG setups. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to a conventional 1DASG, 2DASG prototype provided noticeably lower SPR and Ts values, indicating its superior scatter suppression performance. 2DASG also provided 19% higher average primary transmission that was attributed to the absence of interseptal spacers and optimized grid geometry. Our results indicate that the combined effect of lower scatter and higher primary transmission provided by 2DASG may potentially translate into more accurate CT numbers and improved contrast resolution in CBCT images.