Clinical and molecular characteristics of Jordanian oropharyngeal cancer patients according to P16 expression: a retrospective study and a report of a novel biomarker.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicopathological features of oropharyngeal cancer patients in Jordan based on their HPV status. Sixty-nine biopsies from two hospitals were included. Tissue microarrays were prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens and stained with antibodies for CDKN2A/P16, EGFR, PI3K, PTEN, AKT, pS473AKT, PS2mTOR, and TIMAP. The cohort was divided according to P16 expression. Chi-square test and survival analyses were employed to evaluate the variations among the study variables and determine the prognostic factors, respectively. P16 expression was found in 55.1% of patients; however, there was no significant association between P16 expression and the patients' clinicopathological features. The Kaplan-Meier test revealed that smoking in P16-positive group and younger age (< 58 years) negatively impacted disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.04 and P = 0.003, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression test indicated that smoking, age, PI3K, and AKT were negative predictors of DFS (P = 0.021, P = 0.002, P = 0.021, and P = 0.009, respectively), while TIMAP was a positive predictor (P = 0.045). Elevated P16 expression is found in more than half of the patients' specimens. DFS is negatively affected by younger age and the combined effect of smoking and P16 overexpression. TIMAP is overexpressed in P16-positive oropharyngeal cancer, and it is a favorable predictor of DFS.

Transcervical approach to oropharyngeal synovial sarcoma: a case report.

Aim: Synovial sarcomas (SS) are malignant tumors rarely arising in the head and neck region. In most of these cases, the tumor arises in the cervical or hypopharyngeal region, and extremely rarely in the oropharynx. Case report: Herein, we report the case of a 22-year-old male oropharyngeal SS patient presented with breathing difficulty and dysphagia. The management plan included an emergency tracheostomy, followed shortly by transcervical resection of the oropharyngeal sarcoma tumor, the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap was used for pharyngeal reconstruction, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy resulting in more than 5 years disease-free survival. Conclusion: SS arising in the oropharynx are extremely rare. Transcervical resection coupled with adjuvant radiotherapy warrants enhanced locoregional control in advanced oropharyngeal cases.

Stapler Pharyngeal Repair Versus Conventional Suturing After Laryngectomy in Jordanian Laryngeal Cancer Patients.

Background: The use of staplers in surgical repair of the pharynx after laryngectomy has gained traction in recent years, with differing results. Objective: In this study, we compare the use of stapler suturing (SS) after laryngectomy in comparison with the manual suturing (MS) technique in laryngeal cancer patients regarding pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) formation, operative time, blood loss, margin status, and length of hospital stay. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of laryngeal cancer patients undergoing pharyngeal repair after total laryngectomy by either a stapler or manual suturing. Demographic data, stage of disease, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and operative time were collected. Results: A total of 59 laryngeal cancer patients were included, of which 22 underwent SS and 37 had MS. Our cohort was predominantly males (98%), and similar mean ages were observed across both suturing groups (60.5 vs 59.9, P = 0.83). Negative margins were more frequent with SS (100% vs 86.5%, P = 0.13) yet this difference was not statistically significant, whereas preoperative tracheostomy procedure was present more in MS patients (43.2% vs 0, P = 0.003). Lymph node involvement was higher in the manual suturing cohort, yet this difference was statistically insignificant (41.2% vs 25%, P = 0.49). The muscle flap procedure was significantly higher in the MS cohort (70.3% vs 20%, P = 0.001). In both groups, comparable PCF rates were noted (13.3% vs 10.8%) and there was no association between salvage laryngectomy and PCF occurrence in the entire cohort. For surgery details, there was no statistical difference between both groups in blood loss, hospitalization length, or oral feeding start. Only surgical time was significantly lower in the stapler cohort (277 vs 372.6 minutes, P = 0.000). Conclusion: Both suturing techniques did not show any statistically significant difference in PCF rates. However, was markedly reduced with stapler use in comparison to manual suturing. Further randomized studies with larger sample size are needed to validate the role of stapler suturing for pharyngeal repair.

Giant versus regular parathyroid adenoma: A retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: A fraction of Parathyroid Adenoma (PTA) is considered giant if they weigh more than 3.5 g. There is no clear consensus whether this subgroup has a distinct clinical or biochemical presentation that could have implications on PTA localization and management. In this study, we investigate the difference between regular and giant PTA patients regarding their clinical and laboratory findings as well as their postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and PTA-related data were retrospectively retrieved from all patients undergoing parathyroidectomy from 2010 to 2019 at our hospital. RESULTS: A total number of 84 PTA (Females 76.2%) patients were included, of which 24 (28.6%) qualified as a giant with a mean weight of 7.86 g and the rest were regular adenomas (71.4%) with a mean weight of 1.45 g. Giant adenomas were more likely to present at a younger age compared to regular adenoma patients, (44.4 vs 50.8, P = 0.053, D = 0.470). Preoperative PTH levels were significantly higher in the giant PTA group (650.8 vs 334.2 pg/mL, P = 0.044, r = 0.22). Hospital stay was on average 1.6 days longer in giant PTA patients compared to regular PTA patients. CONCLUSION: Giant PTA compromised a significant percentage of all adenomas, which was higher than what is reported in the literature and might reflect a delay in diagnosis and lack of screening tests. Both giant and regular adenomas seem to run a similar clinical course, yet biochemical abnormalities in PTH levels may have a predictive value for adenoma weight.