RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Anticancer drug preparation control is essential to ensure quality and patient safety. Drugcam (Eurekam Company) is a digital video-assisted control system based on artificial intelligence methods to identify vials used and volumes withdrawn. As for any control system, qualification is required before use in a chemotherapy compounding unit (CCU). METHODS: We conducted an operational qualification (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy assessment of vials and volumes recognition and quantitative analysis of measured volumes) and a performance qualification (comparison with visual control) of Drugcam in our CCU, as well as an impact study on compounding time and compound supply time. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of vials (94%, 98% and 96%, respectively) and volumes (86%, 96% and 91%, respectively) recognition are satisfactory. It depends on both the object presented and the camera tested. False positives, which could lead to release of non-compliant preparation, were detected. Volume reading errors may exceed the tolerance threshold of ±5% for small volumes. Drugcam did not significantly lengthen compounding time and compound supply time. CONCLUSIONS: No recommendations for a qualification method of this new type of control equipment exist. However, a qualification process is essential to understand tool limitations and integrate them into the CCU risk management system. Drugcam enables anticancer drug preparation to be secure and is also useful for initial and continuous staff training.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel association can be used in first- or second-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Here, we report five cases of supposed gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (G-TMA), four of them with nab-paclitaxel. We assumed that nab-paclitaxel could be responsible for a potential drug interaction with gemcitabine, increasing the risk of thrombotic microangiopathy occurrence. METHODS: Clinicians reported cases of supposed G-TMA that were declared to the Pharmacovigilance center. We collected the patients' data (clinical and biological characteristics), calculated an incidence rate of G-TMA in our center, and a Naranjo score for each patient. We also reviewed literature on a potential drug interaction between nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine. RESULTS: Four patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and one with gemcitabine alone. The time onset of supposed G-TMA was 2 to 11 months. Patients developed anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure. The incidence rate of supposed G-TMA was 2.7% in our center compared to 0.31% (Meyler's Side Effect of Drugs) and 0.01% in the gemcitabine's summary of product characteristics. Literature review outlined an increase of gemcitabine's plasmatic concentrations induced by nab-paclitaxel (Drugs® website) and a potentiation of gemcitabine's effect by nab-paclitaxel in murine models. This study showed that nab-paclitaxel inhibits cytidine deaminase's activity (responsible for gemcitabine's metabolism) and increases gemcitabine's active metabolite concentrations (gemcitabine triphosphate) in tumor tissues. CONCLUSION: High incidence rate of G-TMA was observed in our cohort due to a potential drug interaction between nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine with an increased risk of developing G-TMA. Additional pharmacological and pharmaco-epidemiological investigations are mandatory to explore this hypothesis.