Fibrin glue conjunctival autograft for primary pterygium: Overall outcomes and outcomes in expert versus trainee ophthalmologists.

INTRODUCTION: To determine outcomes of conjunctival autograft attached with fibrin glue (FG) for primary pterygium, and compare these outcomes in expert versus closely supervised trainee ophthalmologists. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, non-randomized, interventional study. Patients were recruited among those with primary nasal pterygium undergoing FG conjunctival autograft. Surgery was performed by expert (136 eyes) or closely supervised trainee (128 eyes) ophthalmologists. Mean follow-up was 7.82±8.23months. Main outcome measures were recurrence rate, reoperation rate and complications. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 264 eyes of 225 patients. Participants were of mean age 47.09±12.89years; 46.7% were male, 28.4% Caucasian and 70.5% Hispanic. Recurrence was recorded in 6.4%: 5.9% in the expert group and 7% in the trainee group (P=0.704) and reoperation in 1.9%: 0.7% and 3.1% (P=0.202), respectively. Both groups showed similar rates of complications such as transient graft edema, graft dehiscence, hematoma or ocular hypertension. Reoperation was slightly more frequent in patients younger than 40years (P=0.064). CONCLUSIONS: Good outcomes were observed for FG conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery, with no differences recorded between supervised trainee and expert surgeons. Our findings suggest the need to supervise pterygium surgeries during training.

Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.

PurposeTo compare measurements taken using a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar 900), and to determine the clinical impacts of differences in their measurements on intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions.MethodsEighty eyes of 80 patients scheduled to undergo cataract surgery were examined with both biometers. The measurements made using each device were axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (MK), white-to-white distance (WTW), and pupil diameter (PD). Holladay 2 and SRK/T formulas were used to calculate IOL power. Differences in measurement between the two biometers were determined using the paired t-test. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsMean patient age was 76.3±6.8 years (range 59-89). Using the Lenstar, AL and PD could not be measured in 12.5 and 5.25% of eyes, respectively, while IOLMaster 700 took all measurements in all eyes. The variables CCT, AQD, LT, and MK varied significantly between the two biometers. According to ICCs, correlation between measurements made with both devices was excellent except for WTW and PD. Using the SRK/T formula, IOL power prediction based on the data from the two devices were statistically different, but differences were not clinically significant.ConclusionsNo clinically relevant differences were detected between the biometers in terms of their measurements and IOL power predictions. Using the IOLMaster 700, it was easier to obtain biometric measurements in eyes with less transparent ocular media or longer AL.

Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and iol power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pupil dilation affects biometric measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer (IOLMaster 700©; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). PROCEDURES: Eighty-one eyes of 81 patients evaluated for cataract surgery were prospectively examined using the IOLMaster 700© before and after pupil dilation with tropicamide 1%. The measurements made were: axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (MK), white-to-white distance (WTW) and pupil diameter (PD). Holladay II and SRK/T formulas were used to calculate IOL power. Agreement between measurement modes (with and without dilation) was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 75.17±7.54 years (range: 57-92). Of the variables determined, CCT, ACD, LT and WTW varied significantly according to pupil dilation. Excellent intraobserver correlation was observed between measurements made before and after pupil dilation. Mean IOL power calculation using the Holladay 2 and SRK/T formulas were unmodified by pupil dilation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pupil dilation produces statistical yet not clinically significant differences in some IOLMaster 700© measurements. However, it does not affect mean IOL power calculation.