Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 28(3): 268-74, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27097885

RESUMO

Guideline development is challenging, expensive and labor-intensive. A high-quality guideline with 90 recommendations for breast cancer treatment was developed within 6 months with limited resources in Costa Rica. We describe the experience and propose a process others can use and adapt.The ADAPTE method (using existing guidelines to minimize repeating work that has been done) was used but existing guidelines were not current. The method was extended to use databases that systematically identify, appraise and synthesize evidence for clinical application (DynaMed, EBM Guidelines) to provide current evidence searches and critical appraisal of evidence. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. Draft recommendations with supporting evidence were provided to panel members for facilitated voting to target panel discussion to areas necessary for reaching consensus.Training panelists in guideline development methodology facilitated rapid consensus development. Extending 'guideline adaptation' to 'evidence database adaptation' was highly effective and efficient. Methods were created to simplify mapping DynaMed evidence ratings to GRADE ratings. Twelve steps are presented to facilitate rapid guideline development and enable further adaptation by others.This is a case report and the RAPADAPTE method was retrospectively derived. Prospective replication and validation will support advances for the guideline development community. If guideline development can be accelerated without compromising validity and relevance of the resulting recommendations this would greatly improve our ability to impact clinical care.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Consenso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas
5.
Am Fam Physician ; 72(12): 2483-8, 2005 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16370404

RESUMO

Up to 7 percent of girls and 2 percent of boys will have a symptomatic, culture-confirmed urinary tract infection by six years of age. Urinary tract infection may be suspected because of urinary symptoms in older children or because of fever, nonspecific symptoms, or failure to thrive in infants. Urine dipstick analysis is useful for ruling out urinary tract infections in cases with low clinical suspicion. However, urine culture is necessary for diagnosis of urinary tract infections in children if there is high clinical suspicion, cloudy urine, or if urine dipstick testing shows positive leukocyte esterase or nitrite activity. Despite current recommendations, routine imaging studies (e.g., renal ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, renal scans) do not appear to improve clinical outcomes in uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Oral antibiotics are as effective as parenteral therapy in randomized trials. The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy has not been established, but one-day therapies have been shown to be inferior to longer treatment courses.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA