Comparative Assessment of Drug Lag for Approved Oncology Targeted Therapies Between Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the European Union.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmaceutical regulation on a global scale is a complex process, with regulatory bodies overseeing various aspects, including licensing, registration, manufacturing, marketing, and labeling. Among these, the USFDA plays a crucial role in upholding public health. The pharmaceutical industry contributes significantly to well-being by developing and distributing therapeutic agents. The journey of evaluating new pharmaceuticals involves meticulous examination through several phases, from safety and efficacy assessments to toxicity evaluation. Drug approval involves submitting New Drug Applications (NDAs) to regulatory agencies like the USFDA and EMA. However, disparities in durations contribute to the phenomenon known as "drug lag." This lag refers to delays in a pharmaceutical product's availability in one market compared to another. Addressing this issue is crucial, given its impact on patient access to treatments. METHOD: This study aims to analyze the extent of drug lag, focusing on newly approved oncology targeted therapies in Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the European Union. Data for cancer treatments authorized by the USFDA, EMA, and SFDA from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2022, were collected from regulatory agency websites. The data sources included authorization letters, prescription information, and evaluation documents. We conducted a comparative assessment of drug lag for approved oncology targeted therapies between Saudi Arabia, the US, and the EU. RESULT: Our analysis identified 135 newly approved oncology-targeted drugs within the specified timeframe. Of these, 71 received approval in all three regions, while disparities were evident in others. The USFDA consistently had the highest number of approved drugs, with 98.5% of drugs initially approved there. In contrast, Saudi Arabia had the lowest number of approved drugs and a significantly longer median drug lag, indicating substantial delays in drug availability. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significance of mitigating drug lag to enhance global healthcare outcomes and patient access to innovative therapies. Further research and collaborative efforts are essential to bridging these disparities and promoting equitable healthcare worldwide.

Advancing the understanding of venetoclax in t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future prospects.

Venetoclax is a selective inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), as a targeted therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. It was initially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in April 2016 and later for acute myeloid leukemia in October 2020. However, venetoclax is used as an off-label in a subset group of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients with the presence of translocation t(11;14). Preclinical and clinical studies have highlighted the potential of venetoclax in the management of MM patients, with a specific focus on t(11;14) as a predictive biomarker for initiating venetoclax-based treatment. Later, several studies in RRMM patients that used venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone or/and proteasome inhibitors have shown promising results, in which management guidelines have included venetoclax as one of the options to treat MM patients. Hence, this review focuses on the use of venetoclax in RRMM, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing strategies, and predictive biomarkers for initiating venetoclax. Additionally, we discuss ongoing studies that are investigating different combination of venetoclax regimens in MM patients.

Assessing oncology providers attitudes and practices toward nonformulary drugs and mapping current obstacles in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction: Formulary drug list is a continually updated list of medications routinely stocked by hospitals and other healthcare facilities and deemed effective, safe, and cost saving. Non-formulary drug (NFD) refers to medications not on the formulary, due to cost or lack of clinical data. This study aimed to examine the processing of NFD requests by oncology providers (OPs) in Saudi Arabia. Method: A cross-sectional survey in Saudi oncology centers gathered perspectives of healthcare practitioners, mainly oncology pharmacists and physicians, on NFDs and request processes, aiming to understand variations, reasons for NFDs, and suggestions for an improved, unified NFDs request algorithm. Result: A total of 93 physicians and pharmacists responded, 57 % were pharmacists, 43 % were physicians, and 94.6 % worked in the governmental sector. Around 31.2 % reported that it takes one week to receive a decision on their NFD request, while 28 % reported it takes two weeks to one month. Furthermore, 35.5 % of participants reported that the complete NFD process, from the initial order placement to the receipt of medications, spans a duration of 2-4 months, while 8.6 % noted a longer duration exceeding six months. The participants reported that the most common obstacles while requesting NFD were procurement delays and lengthy processing times. Additionally, 26.9 % agreed that formulary restrictions hindered medical care and 40.3 % reported delays in patient care. While 33.8 % were forced to use fewer effective options, and 22.1 % referred patients to palliative care. Conclusion: The current practice of NFDs has negative consequences on cancer patient outcomes due to delays in patient care or the use of less effective drugs. Thus, we recommend having a national NFD access program.

De novo lymphoid blastic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: report and contemporary discussion.

OBJECTIVE: We herein describe two cases of de novo lymphoid blastic transformation in patients with no history of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), both of whom were labeled initially as Philadelphia positive B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL). METHODS: The first patient was an 18-year-old male who presented with subjective fever, intentional weight loss, generalized fatigue, and headache. Investigations showed leukocytosis (312 × 10^3/ul), thrombocytopenia and anemia. Flowcytometry was consistent with B-ALL, with aberrant expression of CD13 and CD33. He was found to be positive for BCR::ABL by FISH, and karyotype confirmed the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. He received a pediatric-inspired regimen and achieved remission with negative measurable residual disease (MRD) by flowcytometry, however with persistent cytogenetic abnormality using FISH for BCR::ABL. FISH abnormality was confirmed to be in the myeloid compartment using myeloid segregated FISH, reclassifying the disease to de novo lymphoid blastic phase CML. The second patient was a 52-year-old male who presented with fever and shortness of breath. Bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly were identified on examination, and investigations showed leukocytosis (371 × 10^3/ul), anemia, and thrombocytopenia. BCR::ABL rearrangement was identified by FISH, molecular testing, and confirmed with karyotype. He was treated with Mini-CVD and Ponatinib, achieved complete remission with negative MRD by flow cytometry, however molecular studies showed BCR-ABL1 level at 58% IS indicating a persistent cytogenetic abnormality. RESULTS: De novo lymphoid blastic-phase CML can therefore be difficult to differentiate from Philadelphia positive B-ALL due to their overlapping clinical and laboratory picture, implying the need to do myeloid compartment evaluation at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: With recent progress in the treatment of Philadelphia positive B-ALL, including the role of transplant with the use of novel agents, a better characterization of this disease entity in retrospective and prospective trials is warranted.

Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature.

The management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) involves several lines of therapy such as corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. With the emergence of novel therapies such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), there has been a shift in treatment modalities. Eltrombopag and romiplostim have proven to be effective in the management of ITP through clinical studies, but their safety in pregnancy remains uncertain. The purpose of the study is to review the literature to evaluate the safety of TPO-RAs in pregnant women. Ten case reports and a cohort study pertaining to the use of TPO-RAs in pregnancy were obtained. According to the reported cases and prospective study, the use of eltrombopag and romiplostim appears to be relatively safe in the first, second, and third trimesters, as there were no reported congenital malformations. Low fetal birth weight has been observed following the administration of eltrombopag during the second trimester, whereas preterm birth has occurred following the administration of eltrombopag in the third trimester. Eltrombopag and romiplostim seem relatively safe. Further studies are necessary to clarify their safety during pregnancy.

The use of 5-azacytidine in pregnant patient with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): a case report.

BACKGROUND: The management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) during pregnancy remains challenging as both the maternal and fetal outcomes should be considered. Several reports suggested that chemotherapy can be administered safely during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. However, the use of 5-azacytidine presents limitation due to lack of data. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-years-old woman in the 26th week of gestation diagnosed with FLT3/ITD-mutated AML, complete remission was induced by Daunorubicin and Cytarabine, and subsequently with 5-azacytidine (75 mg/m2 daily for 7 days) with no fetal hematological or toxicity issues. Fetal ultrasound showed no aberrant morphology. Fetal size below the 5th percentile with normal umbilical artery dopplers, normal middle cerebral artery dopplers and ductus venosus doppler. Three weeks post 5-azacytidine, the team determined the most appropriate time for delivery after balancing the risks of prematurity and prevention of disease relapse since patient in hematological remission. The patient underwent elective lower segment caesarian section and had a baby girl delivered at 35 weeks of gestation weighing 1670 g without apparent anomalies. CONCLUSION: Treatment using 5-azacytadine during last trimester of pregnancy resulted in no major fetal and maternal complications. These findings concluded that 5-azacytadine during the third trimester of pregnancy seems to be safe however, potential risks of this agent should be considered.

Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13% of all lung cancer diagnoses each year. SCLC is characterized by a rapid doubling time, early metastatic spread, and an unfavorable prognosis overall. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Most patients with SCLC will respond to initial treatment; however, the majority will experience a disease recurrence and response to second-line therapies is poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may be an option given the success in other diseases. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using Medline (1946-July week 1, 2017) and Embase (1996-2017 week 28) with the search terms small cell lung cancer combined with nivolumab or ipilimumab or pembrolizumab or atezolizumab or tremelimumab or durvalumab. Five clinical trials, including extended follow-up for 2, that evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors in limited stage or extensive stage SCLC were included. RESULTS: In 2 phase 2 trials, ipilimumab was added to upfront chemotherapy. In both trials, an improvement in progression-free survival was seen. Toxicity, when combined with a platinum and etoposide, was significant. In a confirmatory phase 3 trial, ipilimumab did not prolong overall survival when added to first-line chemotherapy. Overall, response rates were similar between the placebo and ipilimumab groups. A phase 1/2 trial evaluated nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in recurrent SCLC. Results revealed that nivolumab monotherapy and the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab were relatively safe and had antitumor activity. Pembrolizumab has been evaluated in a multicohort, phase 1b trial. Preliminary data showed a durable response in the second-line setting. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of overall survival data and significant toxicity associated with the combination of ipilimumab with first-line chemotherapy, this treatment is not a reasonable option at this time. Nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab is a valid option for recurrent SCLC.