Septal Myectomy Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist regarding characteristics and outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing septal myectomy. We evaluated this in a large referral population. METHODS: Septal myectomy was performed in 199 consecutive patients aged ≤18 years with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from January 1, 1976, to June 30, 2021. RESULTS: Median age was 13 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8-15 years). Left ventricular myectomy approaches included transaortic (163 of 198 [82%]), transapical (16 of 198 [8%]), and combined (19 of 198 [10%]). Right ventricular interventions included myectomy (13 of 199 [7%]) and patch reconstruction of the outflow tract (15 of 199 [8%]). Maximum left ventricular outflow tract gradients decreased after myectomy (prebypass: 50 mm Hg [IQR, 31-73 mm Hg] vs postbypass: 4 mm Hg [IQR, 0-9 mm Hg], P < .001), and this was sustained long-term (5 mm Hg [IQR, 5-10 mm Hg] at 10 years). Iatrogenic aortic and mitral valve injuries occurred in 13 of 199 (7%) and 1 of 199 (1%), respectively; however, all were successfully repaired. Operative mortality was 2 of 199 (1%). The cumulative incidence of redo myectomy was low, at 5.8% at 5 and 8.3% at 10 years. Redo myectomy patients had higher maximum left ventricular outflow tract gradients on echocardiography at predischarge and 1 year and were younger at the index operation (8 years [IQR, 2.5-10 years] vs 13 years [IQR, 9-16 years], P < .001). Overall survival at 10 years was 90%, relative to 47% in a previously reported pediatric nonoperative cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric septal myectomy provides safe, effective, and durable relief of ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Iatrogenic valve injury remains a low but nonnegligible risk. Recurrent obstruction requiring redo myectomy is infrequent and can be identified early. Long-term survival in this pediatric septal myectomy cohort appears to fare better than pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cohorts managed nonoperatively.

Sociotechnical Intervention for Improved Delivery of Preventive Cardiovascular Care to Rural Communities: Participatory Design Approach.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend antiplatelet and statin therapies as well as blood pressure control and tobacco cessation for secondary prevention in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). However, these strategies for risk modification are underused, especially in rural communities. Moreover, resources to support the delivery of preventive care to rural patients are fewer than those for their urban counterparts. Transformative interventions for the delivery of tailored preventive cardiovascular care to rural patients are needed. OBJECTIVE: A multidisciplinary team developed a rural-specific, team-based model of care intervention assisted by clinical decision support (CDS) technology using participatory design in a sociotechnical conceptual framework. The model of care intervention included redesigned workflows and a novel CDS technology for the coordination and delivery of guideline recommendations by primary care teams in a rural clinic. METHODS: The design of the model of care intervention comprised 3 phases: problem identification, experimentation, and testing. Input from team members (n=35) required 150 hours, including observations of clinical encounters, provider workshops, and interviews with patients and health care professionals. The intervention was prototyped, iteratively refined, and tested with user feedback. In a 3-month pilot trial, 369 patients with ASCVDs were randomized into the control or intervention arm. RESULTS: New workflows and a novel CDS tool were created to identify patients with ASCVDs who had gaps in preventive care and assign the right care team member for delivery of tailored recommendations. During the pilot, the intervention prototype was iteratively refined and tested. The pilot demonstrated feasibility for successful implementation of the sociotechnical intervention as the proportion of patients who had encounters with advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants), pharmacists, or tobacco cessation coaches for the delivery of guideline recommendations in the intervention arm was greater than that in the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: Participatory design and a sociotechnical conceptual framework enabled the development of a rural-specific, team-based model of care intervention assisted by CDS technology for the transformation of preventive health care delivery for ASCVDs.