Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 17: 100308, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264152

RESUMO

Background: Spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) are a devastating condition with high levels of associated morbidity and mortality. Hounsfield units (HUs), a marker of radiodensity on CT scans, have previously been correlated with adverse events following spinal interventions. We evaluated whether HUs might also be associated with all-cause complications and/or mortality in this high-risk population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out within an academic health system in the United States. Adults diagnosed with a SEA between 2006 and 2021 and who also had a CT scan characterizing their SEA within 6 months of diagnosis were considered. HUs were abstracted from the 4 vertebral bodies nearest to, but not including, the infected levels. Our primary outcome was the presence of composite 90-day complications and HUs represented the primary predictor. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted adjusting for demographic and disease-specific confounders. In sensitivity testing, separate logistic regression analyses were conducted (1) in patients aged 65 and older and (2) with mortality as the primary outcome. Results: Our cohort consisted of 399 patients. The overall incidence of 90-day complications was 61.2% (n=244), with a 7.8% (n=31) 90-day mortality rate. Those experiencing complications were more likely to have undergone surgery to treat their SEA (58.6% vs. 46.5%; p=.018) but otherwise the cohorts were similar. HUs were not associated with composite 90-day complications (Odds ratio [OR] 1.00 [95% CI 1.00-1.00]; p=.842). Similar findings were noted in sensitivity testing. Conclusions: While HUs have previously been correlated with adverse events in certain clinical contexts, we found no evidence to suggest that HUs are associated with all-cause complications or mortality in patients with SEAs. Future research hoping to leverage 3-dimensional imaging as a prognostic measure in this patient population should focus on alternative targets. Level of Evidence: Level III; Observational Cohort study.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989253

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative delirium is common for patients with hip fracture. Predictors of postoperative delirium and its association with preexisting dementia and adverse postoperative outcomes in a geriatric hip fracture population were assessed. METHODS: Patients with hip fracture aged 60 years and older were identified in the 2016 and 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure Targeted Databases. Independent risk factors of postoperative delirium were identified. Associations with mortality, readmission, and revision surgery were evaluated using moderation and mediation analysis. RESULTS: Of 18,754 patients with hip fracture, 30.2% had preoperative dementia, 18.8% had postoperative delirium, and 8.3% had both preoperative dementia and postoperative delirium. Independent predictors of postoperative delirium were as follows: older age, male sex, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, dependent functional status, nongeneral anesthesia, preoperative diabetes, bleeding disorder, and preoperative dementia. Preoperative dementia and postoperative delirium each had an independent correlation with 30-day mortality (odds ratios = 2.06 and 1.92, respectively, with P < 0.001 for both). However, when both were present, those with preoperative dementia and postoperative delirium had an even higher odds of mortality based on moderation analysis (odds ratio = 2.25, P < 0.001). Readmissions and reoperations were significantly correlated with postoperative delirium, but not with preoperative dementia. The combination of preoperative dementia and postoperative delirium, however, did have compounding effects. Furthermore, a significant proportion of the total effect of preoperative dementia on mortality and readmission was accounted for by the development of postoperative delirium based on mediation analysis (medeff: 7%, P < 0.001 and medeff: 35%, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Postoperative delirium is a potentially preventable postoperative adverse outcome that was seen in 18.8% of 18,754 patients with hip fracture. Those with preoperative dementia seem to be a particularly at-risk subpopulation. Quality improvement initiatives to minimize postoperative delirium in this hip fracture population should be considered and optimized.


Assuntos
Delírio , Fraturas do Quadril , Ossos Pélvicos , Idoso , Delírio/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA