Positive predictive value for malignancy on surgical excision of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed by stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy (VANCB): a large multi-institutional study in Italy.

Percutaneous core biopsy (CB) has been introduced to increase the ability of accurately diagnosing breast malignancies without the need of resorting to surgery. Compared to conventional automated 14 gauge needle core biopsy (NCB), vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy (VANCB) allows obtaining larger specimens and has recognized advantages particularly when the radiological pattern is represented by microcalcifications. Regardless of technical improvements, a small percentage of percutaneous CBs performed to detect breast lesions are still classified, according to European and UK guidelines, in the borderline B3 category, including a group of heterogeneous lesions with uncertain malignant potential. We aimed to assess the prevalence and positive predictive values (PPV) on surgical excision (SE) of B3 category (overall and by sub-categories) in a large series of non-palpable breast lesions assessed through VANCB, also comparison with published data on CB. Overall, 26,165 consecutive stereotactic VANCB were identified in 22 Italian centres: 3107 (11.9%) were classified as B3, of which 1644 (54.2%) proceeded to SE to establish a definitive histological diagnosis of breast pathology. Due to a high proportion of microcalcifications as main radiological pattern, the overall PPV was 21.2% (range 10.6%-27.3% for different B3 subtypes), somewhat lower than the average value (24.5%) from published studies (range 9.9%-35.1%). Our study, to date the largest series of B3 with definitive histological assessment on SE, suggests that B3 lesions should be referred for SE even if VANCB is more accurate than NCB in the diagnostic process of non-palpable, sonographically invisible breast lesions.

Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.

AIM: We studied imaging, pathology and diagnostic aspects of false negative assessment (FNA) in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography. METHOD: Subjects were women aged 50-69 years undergoing biennial screening mammography within the Florence District screening programme from January 1992-December 2001 (339,953 consecutive screens). We identified all cancers occurring in women recalled to assessment and ascertained, and reviewed, all cases considered as negative on assessment and subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer. We compared imaging features, tumour histology and stage, and diagnostic testing on assessment for all women with cancer, and presentation and length of delay in women falsely negative on assessment. RESULTS: Eleven thousand six hundred and twenty four women were recalled to diagnostic assessment (recall rate = 3.4%) predominantly for suspicious mammography (9,216 positive screens). Breast cancer was missed in 57 cases: a FNA rate of 0.50% (0.37-0.62%) and comprising 4.1% (3.0-5.1%) of cancers occurring in women recalled after a positive screen. Two types of abnormalities were significantly more frequent in FNA cases than cancers detected at assessment: mass with regular borders (21.1 vs. 5.6%, p = 10(-5)), and asymmetrical density (22.8 vs. 5.4%, p = 10(-5)). On review 56% of FNAs were benign or probably benign BI-RADS categories. FNA occurred in 1.4% of early recalls and in 0.4% of initial assessment (p=0.0001). Significantly fewer tests were performed when assessing missed cancers than detected cancers with the most significant difference noted for FNAC (29.8 vs. 96.0%, p=10(-6)); mammography as the only evaluation on assessment was more frequent in missed cancers (31.5% vs 0.2%, p = 10(-6)). The 57 missed cases were subsequently diagnosed at early recall (2 cases), next biennial screen (11 cases), or as interval breast cancers (44 cases) with a mean delay in diagnosis of 628 days. Tumour histology, size and nodal status did not significantly differ between cancers missed and cancers diagnosed on assessment. CONCLUSION: False negatives on assessment represent a minority group in whom screening has failed. They might be reduced by adopting a more intensive diagnostic approach to assessment. Although there was no evidence of a worse prognosis in cancers missed at assessment, the delay in diagnosis is substantial and may impact long-term outcomes.

Analysis of the results of a proficiency test in screening mammography at the CSPO of Florence: review of 705 tests.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a sample of Italian radiologists undergoing a proficiency test of screening mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the results of 705 tests (537 first tests, 168 repeat tests) taken during 1997-2005 by 537 Italian radiologists. The test, consisting of 17 screen-detected cancer cases and 133 negative controls, was validated by a panel of expert readers defining a minimum standard as to sensitivity for cancer and recall rate of negative controls. Success rates were assessed as a function of previous experience in mammography (years of experience, total mammograms read, mammograms read in the last year). RESULTS: A total of 176 radiologists successfully passed the test at their first attempt (32.7%). Success correlated with experience, measured in terms of years of experience (5-year cutoff: chi(2) for trend=4.17, p=0.04), total mammograms read (chi(2) for trend =11.8, p=0.002) or mammograms read in the last year (chi(2) for trend=6.27, p=0.04). Training improves performance at repeat testing: after a first negative attempt, a second attempt was successful in 50.6% of cases (74/146) and a third in 68.1% (15/22). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of Italian radiologists taking the test showed limited proficiency in screening mammography. This finding is consistent with several reports of poor performance of service screening compared with reference standards. As expected, test performance is associated with experience, suggesting that the current policy of employing non-dedicated, untrained, general radiologists in screening should be reconsidered. Test performance improves with training (courses, consultation of teaching atlases). Several screening programmes in Italy have been implemented without prior adequate radiologist training. Radiologist training needs to be considered a priority, at least in those screening programmes that are still to be implemented in one third of the country.

Computer-aided detection (CAD) of cancers detected on double reading by one reader only.

We evaluated the role of computer-aided detection (CAD) in cancers undergoing double reading and detected by one reader only. A series of 33 cancers, originally missed by the first reader and detected by the second reader, and 75 negative controls were processed to assess CAD sensitivity, and was read by the six radiologists who originally missed the cancers with the help of CAD printouts. CAD case-based sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were 51.5%, 18.6% and 21.7%, respectively. Average sensitivity of all radiologists in all cancers in the series was 74.7%, being higher for CAD+ (86.2%) than for CAD- (62.5%) cancers (P<0.01). When reading cancer cases that they had originally missed, radiologists had a sensitivity of 75.8%, which was higher for CAD+ (100.0%) than for CAD- (58.3%) cancers. The average recall rate was 14.2%, the majority of recalls (45 out of 64) occurring for lesions marked by CAD. CAD may help in detecting at most half of cancers missed at a single reading but detected by a second reader.

The role of arbitration of discordant reports at double reading of screening mammograms.

OBJECTIVE: To asses the effectiveness of arbitration of discordant double readings in mammography screening. DESIGN: A retrospective study of 1217 consecutive arbitrations. SETTING: A subset of discordant double readings from the Florence screening programme underwent arbitration by a third reader. RESULTS: Positive arbitration of 1217 discordant double readings prompted assessment in 476 cases (39.2%), detecting 30 cancers (6.3%). Of 741 negative arbitrations (60.8%), 311 have been followed up thus far, and two cancers (0.64%) occurred in the site previously suspected at one of the two independent readings. Arbitration had a sensitivity of 86.3% and a negative predictive value of 99.3%. Arbitration reduced the overall referral rates from 3.82% to 2.59% (relative decrease 32.1%). Due to false-negative arbitration, cancers detected per 1000 women screened would decrease from 4.58 to 4.50 (relative decrease 1.7%). For every cancer missed due to false-negative arbitration, 151 unnecessary recalls and 21,248 euro would have been saved, whereas the saved cost per screened woman due to arbitration was 1.72 euro. DISCUSSION: Arbitration of discordant double reading would substantially reduce referral rates with a limited reduction in cancer detection rate, and may be recommended as a routine procedure. Greater benefit from arbitration might be expected in the presence of high referral rates at independent double reading, a common scenario in a newly implemented service screening.

Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme.

OBJECTIVE: To assess double reading effectiveness in mammography screening. DESIGN: Retrospective study of 177,631 consecutive mammograms double read during 1998-2003. SETTING: The Florence screening programme, involving 11 trained radiologists. Abnormalities reported by at least one reader prompted assessment. RESULTS: The referral rate was 2.89% for the first reader, 3.15% for the second reader, and 3.59% for either reader. Of 713 total cancers detected, 43 were suspected only by the second reader (6.4% relative, 0.024% increase in absolute detection rate) and had a lower stage compared to the first reader (pTis-pT1b = 65.7 versus 52.0%): 41 were reviewed and classified (error type) as "minimal sign" in six, and "screening error" in 35 cases, or as BI-RADS 3 in one, 4a in 20, 4b in 13, and 4c in three cases. The second reading cost was 2.70 per woman examined, or 11,168 per additional cancer detected (versus 11,585 at a single reading). DISCUSSION: Second reading is effective in detecting a limited number of additional cancer cases. Tumour stage (one-third over 1 cm in diameter) and review findings (high rate of "screening errors" and BI-RADS R4b-c categories) suggest that second reading detects small "difficult cases" as well as larger cancers missed due to fatigue or loss of attention. Second reading reduces screening specificity to a minor extent, and since cancer detection at second reading seems cost-effective the procedure is recommendable in routine practice.

Florence-Sydney Breast Biopsy Study: sensitivity of ultrasound-guided versus freehand fine needle biopsy of palpable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is widely used in the diagnosis of breast cancer. It is unknown whether, for palpable cancers, ultrasound-guided FNAB is more accurate than freehand FNAB, and practice varies between physicians, services and countries. METHODS: From consecutive women attending a major cancer centre in Florence, we prospectively recruited subjects who had a definitely palpable lump which was solid on ultrasound and suspicious of malignancy (n = 102). All subjects were investigated using both ultrasound-guided and freehand FNAB (one aspirate with each method). Radiologists skilled in both sampling techniques performed all clinical examinations and aspirations, and for each subject the same radiologist obtained both FNAB samples. Sequence of aspiration method was randomised. Cytological interpretation was blinded to method of sampling. Comparative sensitivity (and insufficiency) for FNAB using the two methods was calculated in all cancers (n = 97). RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided FNAB resulted in 13.6% (5-22%) less insufficient aspirates than freehand FNAB (chi2 = 7.58; p = 0.006). When insufficient aspirates are included and considered as negative, ultrasound-guided FNAB has a 14.6% (5.8-23%) or a 16.5% (7.6-25.4%) significantly better sensitivity than freehand FNAB (for cytology 3-5 positive or cytology 4-5 positive respectively). When insufficient aspirates are excluded from the analysis, ultrasound-guided FNAB has a 1.4% (-1.2 to 3.9%) or a 2.6% (-2.5 to 7.8%) higher sensitivity than freehand FNAB (for cytology 3-5 positive or cytology 4-5 positive respectively) but this difference in the sensitivity of the two methods is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that ultrasound-guided FNAB has better sensitivity than freehand FNAB in palpable breast cancer, which is predominantly an effect of a significant reduction in insufficient aspirates, but in part an effect of 'upgrading' cytological classification of cancers.

Monitoring interval cancers in mammographic screening: the Florence District programme experience.

The aim of the present study was to monitor the occurrence of interval (breast) cancers (IC) as an interim outcome measure of quality assurance in the mammographic screening programme of the District of Florence. IC were identified by linking breast screening data with registrations of breast cancers from the Tuscany Tumour Registry. The main outcome measures were the numbers, rates, and the proportionate incidence of IC. Overall, 90 invasive IC were observed among women who attended the breast screening programme in the District of Florence from 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1993, respectively, 23, 50, on 17 cases, at 1, 2, and 3 years after the last negative screening test. Expressed as a proportion of underlying incidence, the figures are 16, 44, and 46%. As to risk factors for IC, mammographic density was the most important one in the present survey, whereas no effect of age emerges from the present study.

[The assessment of the impact of a double reading by expert readers in a mass mammographic study]. / Valutazione dell'impatto della doppia lettura da parte di lettori esperti in un'indagine mammografica di massa.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of double reading of screening mammograms by expert radiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the results of independent readings of a proficiency test of screening mammography (140 cases, 32 cancers) performed by four expert radiologists. Double reading was simulated by matching the four original readings in 6 possible combinations. The impact of double reading over single reading was evaluated in terms of increased sensitivity and increased recall rate. RESULTS: Of 32 carcinomas 22, 6, or 4 were identified by 4, 3, or 2 readers, respectively. Of 108 cases negative for cancer a recall for further investigations was suggested by 4, 3, 2, 1 or no reader(s) in 3, 3, 9, 14, or 79 cases, respectively. Inter-reader diagnostic repeatability was good (k = 0.65). Single readers achieved an average sensitivity of 89% (range 87.5-90.6%) and an average recall rate of 12.2% (range 7.4-16.6%). Simulated double reading achieved an average increase in sensitivity of 8.8% (range 6.2-10.95%) and an average increase of recall rate of 6.2% (range 3.8-8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the relative increase of recall rate is relevant (+53.2%), the corresponding gain in sensitivity justifies the use of double reading, which was confirmed to be worthwhile also when expert radiologists are involved. This study confirms the opportunity of adopting double reading as a routine procedure in mammographic screening.

Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists undergoing a proficiency test for screening mammography. DESIGN: Evaluation of performance indicators according to reference standards determined by a panel of experts (sensitivity (reference standard > or = 80%), recall rate (reference standard < or = 15%)). SETTING: 117 Italian radiologists of varying experience (years of practice 0.5-18, average 5.9; mammograms read 500-51,000, average 13,000), all currently reporting clinical mammography and planning to take part in screening in the near future. RESULTS: Eighty four of 117 (72%) radiologists reached the standard for sensitivity, 88 (75%) reached the standard for recall rate, and only 59 (50%) reached both standards and passed the proficiency test. The probability of passing the test was significantly correlated with mammographic practice (p = 0.015), mammograms read (p = 0.024), and mammograms read/year (p = 0.043). DISCUSSION: The performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists currently reporting clinical mammography was disappointing, indicating the need for proper training of at least 50% of the tested subjects. When implementing organised screening the health authority should set up a proper process for training and accrediting radiologists, and a proficiency test should be part of such a process.

Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the contribution of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in reducing unnecessary biopsies of benign solid nonpalpable breast lesions with low suspicion of malignancy at mammography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An evaluation was made of a consecutive series of 2444 solid nonpalpable breast lesions detected by mammography and undergoing guided (sonography or stereotaxy) fine-needle aspiration cytology. Surgical biopsy was made in the presence of strong suspicion of malignancy at mammography and/or of abnormal cytology. RESULTS: The sensitivity was 96.7% and the specificity 77.7% (average follow-up 2.77 years). False-negative/inadequate cytology associated with low suspicion of malignancy at mammography resulted in a diagnostic delay in 27 cancer cases (invasive 20, intraductal 7). On the other hand, cytology led to surgical biopsy in 53 cancer cases which might not otherwise have been biopsied because of low radiological suspicion of cancer. Surgical biopsy of all cases, to avoid diagnostic delays, would have increased the benign biopsy rate by a factor of 4.5, with a rise in the benign: malignant biopsy ratio from 0.44:1 to 1.93:1. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxy- or ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities can achieve a sharp reduction in unnecessary benign biopsies in cases of low suspicion of malignancy at mammography.

[Test for the assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Results of 103 tests carried out by Italian radiologists]. / Test per la valutazione dell'accuratezza diagnostica nella mammografia. Risultati di 103 test sostenuti da radiologi italiani.

This study reports the results of some voluntary Italian radiologists performing 103 proficiency tests in clinical (100 patients, 32 cancers) and screening mammography (150 patients, 17 cancers). Relative to the average accuracy of a panel of expert radiologists, 12 of 49 readers (27%) and 32 of 54 readers (56%) passed the clinical and screening mammography test, respectively. The results were significantly correlated with the readers' previous experience (years of mammographic practice [< 2, 2-4, > 4] and number of mammograms read [< 5,000, 5-10,000, > 10,000]). The rate of passed test was: < 2 years = 0%, 2-4 years = 40%, > 4 years = 66.6% (P = 0.002); < 5,000 mammograms read = 15.3%, 5-10,000 = 28.5%, > 10,000 = 69.2% (P = 0.02). The best results were achieved by the readers with a previous reading experience of at least 10,000 mammograms, a figure which might be used as the reference for a future criterion of accreditation on a national basis. Proper training before reporting mammography is fundamental to ensure a good diagnostic performance. The low number of tests performed in most Italian mammographic practice facilities makes local training highly questionable and requires quite a long time. Reference centers, adequately equipped for training, should be identified for this purpose. Proficiency tests such as those described in the present study are useful to assess individual performance and should be a part of a training program.

[The combined diagnosis of male breast lesions: a review of a series of 748 consecutive cases]. / Diagnostica combinata delle lesioni mammarie maschili: revisione di una serie di 748 casi consecutivi.

The authors reviewed a series of 748 consecutive male patients referred for breast screening; their average age was 50.5 years. A malignant lesion was detected in 20 patients (18 infiltrating ductal carcinomas, 1 intraductal carcinoma and 1 myxosarcoma). Of 18 infiltrating carcinomas, 17 were found in patients over 60 years of age; pT classes were pT1c in 13 patients, pT2 in 2, pT4b in 1, pT4d in 1 and pTx in one patient. Biopsy demonstrated 92 benign lesions (74 gynecomastia cases and 18 other lesions), whereas 636 lesions were considered benign at direct or cancer registry follow-up. Sensitivity was 85% for palpation, 88.8% for mammography, 93.7% for cytology and 100% for US. Specificity was 95.3%, 94%, 95.6% and 97.9%, respectively. Combined palpation and mammography had 100% sensitivity. Sixty-five of 92 benign lesions were submitted to biopsy, even in the absence of suspicion, for psychological/cosmetic reasons. Negative cytology spared unnecessary biopsy in 9 cases, which were fairly suspicious at other exams. To conclude, we confirm the role of this multimodality clinical-instrumental diagnostic approach, with a special emphasis on the role of US. Cytology was as useful to avoid unnecessary open biopsy in men as it is in women. Male breast cancer has the same semiology as female breast cancer, though with a prevalence of opacities with blurred outline and in the absence of scirrhous-stellate patterns. The diagnostic protocol we used to diagnose breast cancer in women seems to be fully indicated also in men.

[The role of ductal galactography in the differential diagnosis of breast carcinoma]. / Ruolo della duttogalattografia nella diagnosi differenziale del carcinoma mammario.

The authors report on a series of 1009 consecutive patients submitted to clinical examination, mammography, cytology and galactography for the presence of nipple discharge. Galactography was performed mainly in the presence of hematic nipple discharge. Surgical biopsy was performed in 392 cases, and 52 cancers (31 invasive and 21 intraductal lesions) were diagnosed, which were suspected at palpation, mammography, cytology and galactography in 17, 17, 18 and 31 cases, respectively. Forty of 52 cancers were suspected on the basis of combined exam findings, while 8 cancers (7 intraductal and 1 invasive lesions) were submitted to biopsy on the basis of a galactographic diagnosis of multiple benign papilloma, an (invasive) lesion with a diagnosis of single papilloma, and 3 (invasive) lesions because of persistent hematic discharge. Cancer was suspected with only one exam in 14 cases: 3 at cytology, 2 at mammography, 1 at clinical examination and 8 at galactography. Hematic discharge alone is not a sufficient reason to indicate surgery, because its positive predictive value for cancer is low (< or = 10%), while cytology is of limited help because of its poor sensitivity (34.6%). In contrast, galactography (59.6% sensitivity) gives a greater contribution to differential diagnosis and is always indicated in the presence of hematic discharge. Galactographic evidence suspicious for cancer (67.3% positive predictive value) or for multiple papilloma (9.7% positive predictive value) is sufficient to advise open biopsy. The surgical removal of single papillomas is of questionable benefit, since single papillomas are benign lesions, with no clear evidence of progression to cancer. In our series, only one cancer was misdiagnosed as a single papilloma at galactography (0.5% positive predictive value).

[Combined diagnosis of breast cancer recurrences after conservative treatment. Critical review of 143 consecutive cases]. / La diagnostica combinata delle recidive intramammarie dopo terapia conservativa. Revisione critica di 143 casi consecutivi.

The diagnostic features are reported of 143 consecutive patients with breast cancer intramammary recurrences observed after conservative treatment, 1984 to 1994. Disease-free interval after surgery was 3.7 years on the average, being longer for the patients receiving postoperative breast irradiation (3.9 vs 3.1 years). The conserved breast was followed-up on a regular basis with palpation and mammography, whereas US and cytology were used only in selected suspicious cases. Palpation, mammography, cytology or US suspected the recurrence in 75, 64, 81 and 77% of cases, respectively. Mammographic false negatives were not explained by breast parenchymal density (Wolfe's pattern) or by breast irradiation, but were likely to be ascribed to the masking effect of surgical scars and distortion. Most failures at cytology were caused by inadequate sampling: when sampling was adequate, cytology exhibited the highest sensitivity (97%). In all, combined palpation + mammography, palpation + cytology and palpation + mammography + cytology diagnosed correctly 97, 98 and 100% of cases, respectively. Palpation should be always combined with mammography in the follow-up of the conserved breast, but US and aspiration cytology should be performed in case of any clinico-radiologic abnormality carrying even a minimal risk of recurrence.

Independent double reading of screening mammograms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of independent double reading of screening mammograms. SETTING: Prospective study of 18,817 women undergoing first or repeat screening in a population based programme in the Florence district. METHODS: Mammograms were independently double read by experienced radiologists. Subjects with mammographic abnormalities reported by at least one reader were recalled for diagnostic assessment. The mean increase in recall rate, cancer detection rate, and screening costs attributable to double reading was calculated. RESULTS: Eleven of 125 cancers were detected by only one reader. The mean increase in cancer detection rate attributable to double reading compared with single reading was 4.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 8.9). From a total of 748 cases referred for diagnostic assessment, 196 subjects were referred by one reader only. The mean increase in referral rate attributable to double reading compared with single reading was 15.1% (CI 12.3 to 17.8). Double reading caused a marked increase in the cost for each woman screened -8.5% at the first screening and 6.2% at repeat screening and a more limited increase in the cost for each cancer detected -3.5% at the first screening and 2.7% at repeat screening. Cancers detected by only one screener were at an earlier stage than those detected by both screeners (P = 0.6, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Independent double reading results in only a modest increase in the detection of cancers and therefore may not be cost effective.

Assessment of lesions detected at mammographic screening: performance at first or repeat screening in the Florence programme.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the assessment criteria and the results achieved in the detection of breast lesions at mammographic screening. SETTING: Review of cases assessed in the last screening round of Florence city (FC--first screening round: 29,522 subjects) and Florence district (FD --repeat screening round: 13,268 subjects) programmes. METHODS: Referral and biopsy rates, predictive values, and prevalence of cancers detected by screening were determined, as well as the frequency of the diagnostic procedures used at assessment, and their contribution to the final diagnosis according to the mammographic appearance of the suspected lesion. Assessment costs were estimated. RESULTS: Referral rate (FC 4.2%; FD 1.8%), referral positive predictive value (FC 18.7%; FD 28.3%), surgical biopsy rate (FC 0.96%; FD 0.6%), benign/malignant biopsy ratio (FC 0.20; FD 0.13), and prevalence of cancers detected by screening (FC 0.78%; FD 0.5%) were all within the European Community (EC) recommended standards for screening performance. The benign biopsy rate was considerably lower than that of recommended standards. The cost for each subject assessed was 179,000 Italian lire at the first and 116,000 lire at repeat screening. The cost for each subject screened that was attributable to assessment was 7600 lire at the first or 2100 lire at repeat screening. CONCLUSIONS: Limited referral rates and costs were achieved and the proportion of cancers detected by screening was high. The number of referrals was further reduced at repeat screening, and assessment had a limited impact on total screening costs. Detail or magnification mammography, palpation, sonography, and fine needle aspiration cytology all contributed to the final diagnosis and should be immediately available at the assessment clinic. The observed benign biopsy rate was particularly low and suggests that EC recommended standards should be modified.

Radial scars of the breast: review of 38 consecutive mammographic diagnoses.

The authors report 38 consecutive cases of histologically proved breast radial scars (RSs) detected at mammography. In a retrospective review of mammograms in 30 matched cases of nonpalpable RS and nonpalpable scirrhous cancer, the characteristic mammographic features of RS were confirmed: (a) the absence of a central opacity, often substituted by a radiolucent area; (b) the presence of multiple elongated thin spicules radiating from the center of the lesion; (c) the infrequency of any palpable finding, even for superficial lesions of relatively large size. Microcalcifications with aspecific structure were found in the lesions on mammograms of 14 of the 38 cases and in 24 of the histologic specimens. The typical mammographic features of RS were not specific to RS, being present in a minority of cancer cases. For two blinded readers, sensitivity was 86.7% and 76.7% and specificity was 78% and 80%, respectively. Although some specific mammographic features may suggest the presence of RS, the final differential diagnosis from scirrhous cancer should be based on histologic evidence, and surgical biopsy should be advised for any stellate lesion detected at mammography.

[Errors in mammography. II. False positives]. / L'errore nella mammografia. II. I falsi positivi.

The authors evaluate 261 consecutive mammographic false positives observed from 1985 to 1987. Histological evidence of benign lesion followed in all cases. The comparison with the actual number of cancers and of the whole of mammographic examinations performed in the study period allowed specificity and positive predictive value of mammography to be assessed as 99.5% and 83%, respectively. Specificity and predictivity are lower in younger women, but this is more likely to depend on a different age-related incidence of cancer and benign lesions than on an intrinsic limitation of the method. The reader's diagnostic aggressivity, more than his experience, seems to affect both specificity and predictivity. At review, false positives were mostly due to asymmetric densities (49) or to circumscribed opacities with clear-cut (44) or blurred (62) outlines, whereas irregular star-like opacities or distortions (19) were infrequent. Microcalcifications were, in most cases, apparently benign (39) or dubious (76); strong suspicion was rare (4). Overall, one-fourth to one-third (27.9%) of the cases were reported as strongly suspicious at review. Palpation and cytology were also falsely suspicious--that is, co-responsible for unnecessary biopsies in over 50% of cases. Our results suggest that further improvement in the specificity or positive predictive value of mammography seems unlikely. Moreover, the benign/malignant biopsy ratio (0.2:1) presently achieved in suspicious mammographic cases appears quite satisfactory.