RESUMO
Background: Bone disease-related fractures constitute a heavy burden on the healthcare systems and economy. Vitamin D is an important regulator of bone health and its deficiency is a global problem. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the 1,500 IU nano-encapsulated vitamin D used for fortifying low-fat dairy products (milk and yogurt) on bone health parameters. Methods: This parallel totally blinded, randomized controlled trial was part of the Ultraviolet Intake by Nutritional Approach study and conducted on 306 individuals with abdominal obesity. Individuals were randomly assigned to four groups, including fortified low-fat milk (1,500 IU nano-encapsulated vitamin D3 per 200 g/d), non-fortified low-fat milk, fortified low-fat yogurt (1,500 IU nano-encapsulated vitamin D3 per 150 g/d), and non-fortified low-fat yogurt, for 10 weeks between January and March 2019. Bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) were measured at the baseline and end of the trial. Trabecular bone score and BMD were defined as primary and secondary outcomes. Results: There were no significant differences in TBS and BMD between the intervention and control groups at the end of the trial (P>0.05). Conclusion: This trial demonstrated no significant effect of nano-encapsulated vitamin D fortified milk and yogurt on BMD and TBS. There remains a need for longer-term trials regarding bone health outcomes to establish optimal doses of fortification.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The previous reports on clusterin (CLU) levels in various types of cancer have been controversial and heterogeneous. The present meta-analysis has aimed to evaluate the association between soluble CLU levels and the risk of different human cancers based on observational studies. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the relevant eligible studies in English language from health-related electronic databases up to January 2021. Random effects models were used to calculate the summary standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify the correlation between CLU levels and cancer risk. The meta-regression, sensitivity, Galbraith, and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of between-study heterogeneity. Furthermore, the funnel plot and Egger's linear regression tests were carried out to evaluate the risk of publication bias. RESULTS: According to 16 eligible articles, 3331 patients and 839 healthy controls were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, the CLU levels were significantly higher in various cancer cases compared to the healthy groups (SMD = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.47-2.53). Moreover, subgroup analysis based on types of cancer showed a significant correlation between CLU levels and the risk of digestive system cancers (SMD = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.91-2.18, P <0.001), especially in HCC (SMD = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.76-3.03, P = 0.001), and CRC (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.0-3.23, P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicates a significant association of CLU levels with the risk of digestive system cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer. Therefore, CLU can be monitored as a novel molecular biomarker for the prognosis and diagnosis of various types of cancers particularly in the digestive system.