Vasopressin for Post-kidney Transplant Hypotension.

Introduction: Hypotension after deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) is a risk factor for delayed graft function (DGF) and poor graft survival (GS). We hypothesize that vasopressin use in hypotensive DDKT recipients (DDKTRs) to increase blood pressure (BP) reduces DGF rates and is safe without increasing mortality. Methods: Group with vasopressin "study group" (n = 45) was defined as DDKTRs between 2012 and 2017 who required vasopressin for hypotension systolic BP (SBP) <120 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) <60 mm Hg. DDKTRs with no-vasopressin "comparison group" (n = 90) were propensity score-matched DDKTRs between 2012 and 2017 without vasopressin use. Primary outcomes were GS, creatinine and allograft biopsy rate at 1 year, DGF rate, and death during transplant hospitalization. Results: Vasopressin group had lower mean maximum and minimum SBP and DBP in the operating room (OR). Median vasopressin start time post-DDKT was 2 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1-6), and duration of use was 42 hours (IQR 24-63). DGF, creatinine at 1 year, and allograft biopsy rates were comparable. No deaths occurred during transplant hospitalization. Multivariable analysis did not find an effect of vasopressin use on GS. Conclusion: Treatment of hypotensive DDKTRs with vasopressin is safe and facilitated similar graft function and survival with that of nonhypotensive patients. In the absence of a randomized control trial, our study supports the safety of vasopressin therapy to prevent the adverse effects of hypotension.

A National Survey of Practice Patterns for Accepting Living Kidney Donors With Prior COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: A critical question facing transplant programs is whether, when, and how to safely accept living kidney donors (LKDs) who have recovered from COVID-19 infection. The purpose of the study is to understand current practices related to accepting these LKDs. METHODS: We surveyed US transplant programs from 3 September through 3 November 2020. Center level and participant level responses were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 174 respondents from 115 unique centers responded, representing 59% of US LKD programs and 72.4% of 2019 and 72.5% of 2020 LKD volume (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network-OPTN 2021). In all, 48.6% of responding centers had received inquiries from such LKDs, whereas 44.3% were currently evaluating. A total of 98 donors were in the evaluation phase, whereas 27.8% centers had approved 42 such donors to proceed with donation. A total of 50.8% of participants preferred to wait >3 months, and 91% would wait at least 1 month from onset of infection to LD surgery. The most common reason to exclude LDs was evidence of COVID-19-related AKI (59.8%) even if resolved, followed by COVID-19-related pneumonia (28.7%) and hospitalization (21.3%). The most common concern in accepting such donors was kidney health postdonation (59.2%), followed by risk of transmission to the recipient (55.7%), donor perioperative pulmonary risk (41.4%), and donor pulmonary risk in the future (29.9%). CONCLUSION: Practice patterns for acceptance of COVID-19-recovered LKDs showed considerable variability. Ongoing research and consensus building are needed to guide optimal practices to ensure safety of accepting such donors. Long-term close follow-up of such donors is warranted.

The p53 inhibitor pifithrin-α can stimulate fibrosis in a rat model of ischemic acute kidney injury.

Inhibition of the tumor suppressor p53 diminishes tubular cell apoptosis and protects renal function in animal models of acute kidney injury (AKI). Therefore, targeting p53 has become an attractive therapeutic strategy in the approach to AKI. Although the acute protective effects of p53 inhibition in AKI have been examined, there is still relatively little known regarding the impact of acute p53 inhibition on the chronic sequelae of AKI. Consequently, we utilized the p53 inhibitor pifithrin-α to examine the long-term effects of p53 inhibition in a rodent model of ischemic AKI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to bilateral renal artery clamping for 30 min followed by reperfusion for up to 8 wk. Pifithrin-α or vehicle control was administered at the time of surgery and then daily for 2 days [brief acute administration (BA)] or 7 days [prolonged acute administration (PA)]. Despite the acute protective effect of pifithrin-α in models of ischemic AKI, we found no protection in the microvascular rarefaction at 4 wk or development fibrosis at 8 wk with pifithrin-α administered on the BA schedule compared with vehicle control-treated animals. Furthermore, pifithrin-α administered on a PA schedule actually produced worse fibrosis compared with vehicle control animals after ischemic injury [21%/area (SD4.4) vs.16%/area (SD3.6)] as well as under sham conditions [2.6%/area (SD1.8) vs. 4.7%/area (SD1.3)]. The development of fibrosis with PA administration was independent of microvascular rarefaction. We identified enhanced extracellular matrix production, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and amplified inflammatory responses as potential contributors to the augmented fibrosis observed with PA administration of pifithrin-α.