Pharmacological interactions and menopausal hormone therapy: a review.

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE: Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) is widely used, and there are several statements of international scientific societies to guide prescribers; however, a summary of existing literature about possible drug interactions with HT does not exist, although many midlife women take medications for other conditions. Therefore, our objective was to create a document that presents and synthesizes the most relevant interactions. The impact of the interaction itself and the number of candidates for HT who are likely to use other treatments are considered based on the best available evidence. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to determine the best evidence of interaction effects on relevant outcomes of interest for decision making. A working framework was developed to formulate explicit and reasoned recommendations according to four predefined categories for coadministration: (1) can be used without expected risks, (2) acceptable use (no evidence of negative interaction), (3) alternative treatment should be considered, and (4) nonuse without express justification. The project protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework platform (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/J6WBC ) and in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020166658). RESULTS: Studies targeting our objective are scarce, but 23 pharmacological groups were assigned to one of the predefined categories of recommendation for concomitant use of HT. Vaginal HT was assigned to category 1 for 21 of the analyzed pharmacological groups. For oral and transdermal HT (estrogen-only or combined) and tibolone, there were 12 pharmacological groups assigned to category 1, 12 to category 2, 5 to category 3, and 4 to category 4. Results are shown in crossed-tables that are useful for counseling and prescription. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence of HT interactions with other drugs is scarce and mainly indirect. It comes from biological plausibility, knowledge of extensive concomitant use without reported incidents, and/or extrapolation from hormonal contraception, but there are pharmacological groups in all categories showing that information is useful. These eligibility criteria summarize it and can help in the decision process of HT coadministration with other drugs. Decisions should be taken based on these recommendations but also individualized risk/benefit evaluation, according to underlying pathology, patient's clinical requirements, and the existence or nonexistence of alternatives.

Eligibility criteria for Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT): a position statement from a consortium of scientific societies for the use of MHT in women with medical conditions. MHT Eligibility Criteria Group.

This project aims to develop eligibility criteria for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). The tool should be similar to those already established for contraception A consortium of scientific societies coordinated by the Spanish Menopause Society met to formulate recommendations for the use of MHT by women with medical conditions based on the best available evidence. The project was developed in two phases. As a first step, we conducted 14 systematic reviews and 32 metanalyses on the safety of MHT (in nine areas: age, time of menopause onset, treatment duration, women with thrombotic risk, women with a personal history of cardiovascular disease, women with metabolic syndrome, women with gastrointestinal diseases, survivors of breast cancer or of other cancers, and women who smoke) and on the most relevant pharmacological interactions with MHT. These systematic reviews and metanalyses helped inform a structured process in which a panel of experts defined the eligibility criteria according to a specific framework, which facilitated the discussion and development process. To unify the proposal, the following eligibility criteria have been defined in accordance with the WHO international nomenclature for the different alternatives for MHT (category 1, no restriction on the use of MHT; category 2, the benefits outweigh the risks; category 3, the risks generally outweigh the benefits; category 4, MHT should not be used). Quality was classified as high, moderate, low or very low, based on several factors (including risk of bias, inaccuracy, inconsistency, lack of directionality and publication bias). When no direct evidence was identified, but plausibility, clinical experience or indirect evidence were available, "Expert opinion" was categorized. For the first time, a set of eligibility criteria, based on clinical evidence and developed according to the most rigorous methodological tools, has been defined. This will provide health professionals with a powerful decision-making tool that can be used to manage menopausal symptoms.