IgG4-related Orbital Disease Presenting as an Orbital Apex Lesion.

IgG4-related disease is an uncommon multisystem inflammatory disease characterized by tissue infiltration by IgG4 plasma cells, extensive fibrosis, and sclerosing inflammation. Diffuse orbital involvement extending to the orbital apex and cavernous sinus has been reported, but a solitary well-circumscribed lesion at the apex has not been previously reported. Herein, we report a unique case of IgG4-related orbital disease presenting as a solitary well-circumscribed orbital apex lesion causing subacute visual decline in a 45-year-old male. MRI demonstrated bilateral lacrimal gland and infraorbital nerve enlargement and an 18 × 7 mm left orbital apex lesion demonstrating homogeneous contrast enhancement and isointense signal on T2. He was initially treated with tapering systemic corticosteroid therapy with improvement in his vision; however, he experienced visual deterioration 3 months later with recurrent inflammation. He subsequently commenced high-dose systemic corticosteroid therapy and rituximab infusions with improvement of left visual acuity to 6/7.5 + 2.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Idiopathic Orbital Myositis.

PURPOSE: To characterize the qualitative and quantitative features of idiopathic orbital myositis (IOM) on MRI. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of patients with active IOM with MRI. Patients with incomplete clinical records, poor-quality or interval scans without active myositis, and specific orbital myositis (i.e., orbital myositis secondary to an identified condition) were excluded. An enlargement ratio was calculated by dividing the diameters of the affected extraocular muscle (EOM) by the contralateral unaffected EOM. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (mean age: 44.4 ± 17.8 years-old, male: 11) between 2011 and 2022 were included. One case (4.2%) was pediatric (17 years old), and 6 cases presented with recurrence. Active IOM was characterized by fusiform EOM enlargement, high T2 signal, and contrast enhancement. Average maximal EOM diameters ranged from 4.6 to 7.7 mm (enlargement ratio: 1.4-2.2). Eighteen (75%) patients had single EOM involvement, most commonly the medial rectus. Other ipsilateral structures affected included focal orbital fat (16/24, 66.7%) and lacrimal gland (8/24, 33.3%). Contralateral changes in the EOM and/or lacrimal gland were observed in 7 patients (29.2%). Patients presenting with recurrence were likely to develop ongoing recurrent episodes (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Various radiological patterns of involvement described including EOM enlargement, contrast enhancement, abnormal signal, and involvement of other orbital structures are indicative of active IOM. IOM remains a heterogeneous spectrum of acute and chronic clinico-radiological presentations. Inflammation may involve other ipsilateral or contralateral orbital structures or may be bilateral despite presenting clinically as unilateral disease. Quantitative measurements may have utility in differentiating IOM from other causes of orbital myositis.

Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease.

PURPOSE: Immunogenic causes of inflammation may be difficult to differentiate in the work-up of orbital inflammatory disease. The study aims to investigate the utility of autoimmune markers in the screening for orbital inflammation. Markers studied included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (Anti-CCP) and anti-double stranded DNA antibody (Anti-dsDNA antibody). METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients with non-infective orbital inflammation screened for autoimmune markers at presentation. Serology was interpreted alongside clinical course and other investigations (e.g. radiographic features and histopathology). Tabulated data and Pearson's Chi-square allowed analysis of trends between serology, diagnosis and the decision to biopsy. RESULTS: 79 patients, between 1999 and 2021, were included (50 females, mean age was 50.4 ± 17.4 years). 28 (34.6%) patients had specific orbital inflammation and 53 (65.4%) patients had non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI). Of the 12 patients with positive serology and a specific diagnosis, only 5 (41.7%) patients had concordant serological results. There was no association between serology results and the patient undergoing biopsy (P = 0.651). Serology was unable to exclude nor differentiate NSOI from other specific conditions and ANA had limited discriminatory value between specific conditions and NSOI. CONCLUSION: Serological testing alone may not provide a clear direction for further investigation of orbital inflammation and a biopsy may occur independently of the serological results. The value of autoimmune markers may lie in subsequent follow-up as patients may develop suggestive symptoms after an indeterminate positive result or initially seronegative disease.

Evaluation of orbital lesions with DCE-MRI: a literature review.

PURPOSE: To provide a major review on the applications of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in evaluating orbital lesions. This review also outlines selected scenarios where DCE-MRI may be helpful. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective literature review of all English language publications on PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar between 1994 and 2022. This literature review examined the specific applications and clinical scenarios surrounding the utility of DCE-MRI in orbital lesions and various findings that have been presented in the current literature. RESULTS: DCE-MRI provides information on tissue physiology and permeability, beyond the anatomical features displayed on static imaging. Various measured parameters (qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative) obtained by DCE-MRI have been used to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, specific orbital lymphoproliferative diseases (OLPD), lacrimal gland lesions, and various rare orbital tumours. DCE-MRI has a limited role as an initial diagnostic imaging modality. However, DCE-MRI may prove to have benefit in predicting and monitoring treatment response in orbital lymphoma as a critical imaging study, but literature specific to orbital malignancies remains limited. CONCLUSION: The value of DCE-MRI may be in situations of diagnostic uncertainty, where it may be an additional imaging aid following conventional imaging techniques. It may also act as a critical imaging modality for monitoring of orbital tumour treatment response, but the literature remains limited. Standardisation of imaging protocol, measured parameters, and statistical analysis remain limitations of this imaging technique.