Evolution of transcriptomic profiles in relapsed inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(16) is typically associated with a favourable prognosis. However, up to 40 % of patients will eventually experience disease relapse. Herein, we dissected the genomic and transcriptomic profile of inv(16) AML to identify potential prognostic markers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Sequencing data from 222 diagnostic samples, including 44 relapse/refractory patients, revealed a median of 1 concomitant additional mutation, cooperating with inv(16) in leukemogenesis. Notably, the mutational landscape at diagnosis did not differ significantly between patients experiencing primary induction failure or relapse when compared to the rest of the cohort, except for an increase in the mutational burden in the relapse/refractory group. RNA-Seq of unpaired diagnostic(n=7) and relapse(n=6) samples allowed the identification of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) as one of the most significantly downregulated pathways at relapse. Considering that OXPHOS could be targeted by Venetoclax/Azacitidine combination, we explored its biological effects on an inv(16) cell-line ME-1, but there was no additional advantage in terms of cell death over Azacitidine alone. To enhance Venetoclax efficacy, we tested in vitro effects of Metformin as a potential drug able to enhance chemosensitivity of AML cells by inhibiting the mitochondrial transfer. By challenging ME-1 with this combination, we observed a significant synergistic interaction at least similar to that of Venetoclax/Azacitidine. In conclusions, we identified a downregulated expression of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) at relapse in AML with inv(16), and explored the in vitro effects of metformin as a potential drug to enhance chemosensitivity in this setting.

Treatment Patterns and Pharmacoutilization in Patients Affected by Psoriasis: An Observational Study in an Italian Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data can inform the use of biologics for psoriasis (PSO). OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate treatment patterns and analyze pharmacoutilization in PSO patients in a real-world Italian setting, with a focus on the biologics most recently introduced. METHODS: An observational study based on administrative databases was conducted. Patients were included based on PSO diagnosis identified by either discharge diagnosis or exemption code or prescription of anti-psoriatic topical drugs (proxy of diagnosis). To describe patient characteristics and treatment patterns using the most up-to-date data, two different approaches were used: a cross-sectional study performed during 2016-2018, and a longitudinal study conducted with patients who received their first biological/targeted synthetic drugs (naïve patients) in 2014 and 2017 (the inclusion periods). RESULTS: During 2016-2018, the number of prevalent patients diagnosed with PSO was 194,054 (2016), 210,830 (2017), and 225,171 (2018). The percentage of patients receiving biologics or targeted synthetic agents ranged from 1.5 to 2.1%. Among them, naïve patients receiving interleukin (IL) inhibitors increased from 37.5% (2016) to 69.4% (2018), while those receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) decreased from 62.5% (2016) to 30.6% (2018). The longitudinal analysis included 894 and 1218 naïve patients in 2014 and 2017, respectively, of whom 7.2% (2014) and 6.9% (2017) switched therapy after a mean of 7.1 (2014) and 6.9 (2017) months. Overall, 259 patients were prescribed ixekizumab starting in 2017, of whom 73% were naïve. Ixekizumab was prescribed as monotherapy to 52.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients receiving biologics appeared constant over the years, with an increasing number of naïve patients being prescribed IL-17 inhibitors. Ixekizumab patients were mostly naïve.