Relationships Among Serological Indicators and In Vitro High-Throughput Drug Sensitivity Screening Results in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between serum indicators and high-throughput drug screening (HDS) results, aiming to achieve specific therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This study recruited patients with HCC who underwent surgical resection at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from December 2019 to December 2021. HCC tissues were obtained from patients during surgery and subjected to in vitro cell culture, and then HDS testing was performed on the cultured tissue samples. We used Spearman's correlation analysis to examine the relationships between drug sensitivity results for anti-hepatocellular carcinoma drugs, other antitumor drugs, and serological indicators, the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Systemic Immune Inflammatory Index (SII), Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Lymphocyte Monocyte Ratio (LMR). A significant correlation was considered when P<0.05 and |r|>0.40. Furthermore, linear regression analysis was conducted to elucidate the relationship between serological indicators and drug susceptibility, with significant results indicated by P<0.05 and R²≥0.50. RESULTS: In this study, 82 patients with HCC who had undergone hepatectomy and completed in vitro cell culture and HDS testing were evaluated. Using Spearman's correlation with a significance threshold of P<0.05 and |r|>0.40, we identified significant associations between serological indicators and specific drug regimens: NLR correlated with 5-Fluorouracil, 5- Fluorouracil+Calcium folinate (FOLFOX4), and Capecitabine + Cisplatin (XP); PLR with FOLFOX4; SII with XP, FOLFOX4, Doxorubicin + Oxaliplatin (ADM+L-OHP); and SIRI with XP and FOLFOX4. No correlations were found between PNI or LMR and any drug inhibition rates. A comprehensive evaluation using linear regression analysis-which included variables such as sex, age, hepatitis B virus and liver cirrhosis status, size and number of lesions, alphafetoprotein, total bilirubin, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and prothrombin time, alongside NLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI was conducted in relation to drug regimens. This analysis revealed that NLR, SII, and SIRI are significant predictors of FOLFOX4 inhibition rate, while NLR predicts the inhibition rate of XP effectively. However, no significant links were established between molecular targeted drugs, other antitumor drugs, and serological indicators. CONCLUSIONS: NLR, SII, and SIRI were correlated with FOLFOX4, and the higher the values of NLR, SII, and SIRI, the higher the in vitro inhibition of FOLFOX. Also, NLR was correlated with XP, and the higher the value of NLR, the higher the in vitro inhibition of XP.

Comparison of different adjuvant therapy regimen efficacies in patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate even after radical surgery. Postoperative adjuvant transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE), postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC), postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PA-RT), and postoperative adjuvant molecular targeted therapy have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing the postoperative recurrence rate. The present network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of PA-TACE, PA-HAIC, PA-RT and postoperative adjuvant molecular targeted therapy on the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in HCC patients after radical resection and to determine the optimal treatment strategy. METHODS: Network meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were used to collect eligible studies up to December 25, 2022. Studies related to PA-TACE, PA-HAIC, and postoperative adjuvant molecular targeted therapy after radical HCC resection was included. The endpoints were OS and DFS, and the effect size was determined using hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. R software and "gemtc" package were employed to analyze the results. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies involving 7079 patients with HCC after radical resection were ultimately enrolled to be analyzed. Four postoperative adjuvant therapy measures and two oncology indicators were evaluated. In this study, OS-related investigations validated that PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT markedly enhanced the OS rates in patients after radical resection when compared to PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT, as well as PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. In the DFS-related investigations, PA-RT demonstrated superior efficacy over PA-Sorafenib, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC. Additionally, PA-Sorafenib displayed better efficacy than PA-TACE. Nevertheless, there was no statistical significance between PA-Sorafenib and PA-HAIC, as well as PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. We also performed a subgroup analysis of studies focusing on HCC complicated by microvascular invasion after radical resection. In terms of OS, both PA-RT and PA-Sorafenib demonstrated a noteworthy improvement over PA-TACE, whereas no statistical significance was detected between PA-RT and PA-Sorafenib. Likewise, for DFS, both PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT exhibited superior efficacy compared to PA-TACE. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC after radical resection and a high risk of recurrence, both PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT significantly improved OS and DFS when compared to PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. Notably, PA-RT exhibited superior efficacy over PA-Sorafenib, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC in terms of DFS. Similarly, PA-Sorafenib appeared to be more effective than PA-TACE for DFS.

Salivary orosomucoid 1 as a biomarker of hepatitis B associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Saliva is rich in proteins, DNA, RNA and microorganisms, and can be regarded as a biomarker library. In order to explore a noninvasive and simple means of early screening for liver cancer, proteomics was used to screen salivary markers of hepatitis B associated liver cancer. We used mass spectrometry coupled isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-technology to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Western blot, immunohistochemistry and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay were used to detect marker expression of in tissues and saliva. Statistical analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of the markers was analyzed through statistical analyses. By comparing the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) group with non-HCC groups, we screened out 152 salivary DEPs. We found orosomucoid 1(ORM1) had significantly higher expression in saliva of HCC patients compared with non-HCC groups (p < 0.001) and the expression of ORM1 in liver cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues (p < 0.001). The combination of salivary ORM1 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) showed reasonable specificities and sensitivities for detecting HCC. In a word, salivary ORM1 as a new biomarker of hepatitis B associated hepatocellular carcinoma, combination of salivary ORM1 and AFP as an improved diagnostic tool for hepatocellular carcinoma.