Real-World Data on the Effectiveness of Microporous Polysaccharide Hemospheres for Allowing Even Novice Surgeons to Perform Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Safely.

OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy can be performed more safely and with fewer com- plications since the advent of robot-assisted surgery. However, increased bleeding is a concern when robot-assisted radical prostatectomy includes lymph node dissection and nerve sparing. In real-world clinical practice, inexperienced surgeons sometimes perform robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. In this study, we investigated the effec- tiveness of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres as a local hemostatic agent in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 301 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution between December 2017 and November 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether their surgery was per- formed after the introduction of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres as a local hemostatic agent (group A, n = 140) or before it (group B, n = 161: historical control). RESULTS: Preoperative androgen deprivation therapy was significantly more common in group A than in group B (23 vs. 11, P = .009). Furthermore, surgeons were significantly less experienced (P < .001) and the operation time was significantly longer (260 min- utes vs. 229 minutes; P < .001) in group A than in group B. There was no significant difference in any other patient background characteristics or in the surgical outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres allowed even inex- perienced surgeons to perform robot-assisted radical prostatectomy without compro- mising surgical outcomes.

Comparative analyses define differences between BHD-associated renal tumour and sporadic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome, caused by germline alteration of folliculin (FLCN) gene, develops hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumour (HOCT) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC), whereas sporadic ChRCC does not harbor FLCN alteration. To date, molecular characteristics of these similar histological types of tumours have been incompletely elucidated. METHODS: To elucidate renal tumourigenesis of BHD-associated renal tumours and sporadic renal tumours, we conducted whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of sixteen BHD-associated renal tumours from nine unrelated BHD patients, twenty-one sporadic ChRCCs and seven sporadic oncocytomas. We then compared somatic mutation profiles with FLCN variants and RNA expression profiles between BHD-associated renal tumours and sporadic renal tumours. FINDINGS: RNA-seq analysis revealed that BHD-associated renal tumours and sporadic renal tumours have totally different expression profiles. Sporadic ChRCCs were clustered into two distinct clusters characterized by L1CAM and FOXI1 expressions, molecular markers for renal tubule subclasses. Increased mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number with fewer variants was observed in BHD-associated renal tumours compared to sporadic ChRCCs. Cell-of-origin analysis using WGS data demonstrated that BHD-associated renal tumours and sporadic ChRCCs may arise from different cells of origin and second hit FLCN alterations may occur in early third decade of life in BHD patients. INTERPRETATION: These data further our understanding of renal tumourigenesis of these two different types of renal tumours with similar histology. FUNDING: This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grants, RIKEN internal grant, and the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Center for Cancer Research.

Case of inverted papillary urothelial carcinoma in the ureter.

INTRODUCTION: Urothelial neoplasms with a varus growth pattern are rare, and few urologists have encountered inverted urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old man was referred to our hospital for investigation of gross hematuria. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed nodules measuring 1-2 mm in diameter in the left upper ureter with slight reduction in signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging. Ureteroscopy showed a pedunculated smooth tumor that had the appearance of an inverted papilloma rather than the papillary shape typical of urothelial carcinoma. The tumor was biopsied and histopathological examination revealed a noninvasive, low-grade urothelial carcinoma with inverted multiple layers. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy was subsequently performed, and a pedunculated tumor measuring 20 mm in diameter was found in the left upper ureter. The histopathological diagnosis was inverted papillary urothelial carcinoma, low-grade, pTa, pN0. CONCLUSION: This report provides the first clinical description of inverted papillary urothelial carcinoma of the ureter.