Tailored Yoga Intervention for Postlumbar Spine Surgical Pain Management: A Feasibility Study.

Introduction: Severe pain, anxiety, and high opioid use are common following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). Yoga helps to reduce pain and anxiety, but it has not been considered for postsurgical care. The authors developed and tested the feasibility of a tailored yoga program designed for individuals undergoing LSS and explored clinical feasibility of yoga intervention on measures of pain, function, psychological status, and opioid use. Methods: Individuals scheduled for LSS were randomized into yoga versus control groups presurgery. Participants in the yoga group received tailored yoga sessions plus usual care, whereas participants in the control group received usual care only during the hospital stay post-LSS. In-person daily yoga sessions were individually presented and performed in the participant's hospital room. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates, rate of yoga session completion, tolerance to yoga intervention, and ability to carry out planned assessment. Exploratory clinical outcomes included pain, psychological measures, Timed-Up-and-Go test, gait distance, and opioid use, during the hospital stay post-LSS. Results: Forty-one participants were enrolled, of which 30 completed. There were no dropouts. Planned assessments were completed within 45 min, suggesting no excessive burden on participants. Baseline variables were similar across both groups. The majority of participants participated in yoga intervention on the day of surgery or one day after surgery with acceptance rate of 100%. Participants showed good tolerance to yoga intervention on 0-4 tolerance scale and by their reports of exploratory clinical outcomes. Conclusion: This study indicates feasibility for a modified yoga program for postoperative care following LSS due to participant tolerance and retention. The results provide preliminary framework for future confirmatory studies that can assess the potential benefits of yoga in reducing pain, catastrophizing behavior, and opioid use and improving function. A modified yoga program focusing on diaphragmatic breathing, relaxation, and core isometric contraction exercises can be an important adjunct intervention for patients undergoing LSS. CTR Number: This trial was registered in UMIN CTR (https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/) with registration number: UMIN000032595.

Sleep quality in individuals with chronic low back pain and central sensitization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sleep problems are common in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Central sensitization (CS) is present in a subgroup of individuals with CLBP. However, our knowledge about whether sleep quality varies between the subgroups of CLBP is limited. Therefore, we sought to examine whether the subgroup of CLBP with CS has poorer sleep quality than the subgroup without CS. METHODS: 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey (2011 FM survey) was used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the CLBP participants into two subgroups: CLBP with CS and CLBP without CS. We also created a CS index comprising a set of quantitative sensory testing measures (i.e., pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation) to evaluate pain sensitivity. Sleep quality was assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Group differences about PSQI and CS index and associations between sleep quality and CS across the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 60 participants with CLBP and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Overall, 80% of the participants with CLBP presented with poor sleep quality. Participants with CLBP with CS showed significantly higher PSQI scores (poorer sleep) than participants with CLBP without CS and HCs (p < 0.05). Both the 2011 FM survey and CS index were significantly correlated with sleep quality (r = 0.5870, p < 0.001 and r = -0.264, p = 0.04). Logistic regression models revealed that the FM status (odds ratio (OR) = 6.00, p = 0.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-42.1]), but not the CS index (OR = 1.11, p = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.48-2.71]) was associated with PSQI. After adjusting covariates, the results remained similar but became non-significant for the FM status. DISCUSSION: We found that sleep problems were more common and severe in those who exhibited signs of CS. Thus, clinicians may consider using 2011 FM survey to identify those with CS and co-existing sleep problems.

Protocol for Testing Yoga to Reduce Post-Lumbar Spine Surgery Pain: A Methodology Article.

Currently, acute postoperative pain during hospitalization is primarily managed by medications, and patients must adhere to restrictive postoperative precautions for 3 months following lumbar spine surgeries. Yoga can be an alternative approach to assist in acute and subacute postoperative pain management, anxiety, and return to function. The purpose of the present work was to develop and test the feasibility and explore the effectiveness of a tailored yoga program, delivered in-person during the hospital stay and electronically after hospital discharge, as a potential new avenue for postoperative care. This pilot study will use a crossover randomized controlled design. Individuals aged between 40 and 80 years who are scheduled for lumbar laminectomy and/or fusion, and who have not practiced regular yoga within the past 6 months at the time of enrollment, will be recruited and randomized to either a tailored yoga program (intervention group) or usual care (control group) during the hospital stay (phase one). Bearing in mind postoperative precautions, all subjects will be instructed to perform a home-based tailored yoga program delivered electronically via YouTube links for 8 weeks post-hospital discharge (phase two). The primary outcome measures assessing feasibility are adherence/compliance. Secondary outcome measures include pain, anxiety, function, sleep, perceived stress, and pain-catastrophizing behavior. Length of hospital stay and pain medication use, gait distance, and overall physical activity during hospitalization will also be collected. Finally, a qualitative interview will be obtained after completion of the hospital and home-based programs. This study will determine the feasibility of a tailored yoga program for acute and subacute postoperative lumbar spine surgery pain, anxiety, and functional outcomes.

Correlation Between Central Sensitization and Remote Muscle Performance in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine associations between the degree of central sensitization (CS) and remote muscle performance in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: The 2011 fibromyalgia (FM) criteria and severity scales (2011 FM survey) were used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the participants into 2 groups: FM-positive CLBP and FM-negative CLBP. Measures related to central sensitization included the 2011 FM survey and pressure pain threshold of the thumbnail. Measures related to muscle performance included neck flexor muscle strength and endurance and plantar flexor muscle strength. Between-groups and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Sixty people with CLBP were enrolled (30 FM-positive, 30 FM-negative). There was no significant difference between the subgroups in age, sex, or pain duration (P > .05). The FM-positive CLBP group showed poorer neck flexor muscle endurance (P = .01) and plantar flexor muscle strength (P = .002) than the FM-negative CLBP group, whereas neck flexor muscle strength was not different between the groups (P = .175). Scores for FM and values for pressure pain thresholds of the thumbnail were associated with neck flexor muscle strength (respectively, r = -0.320, P = .013, and r = 0.467, P < .001), endurance (r = -0.242, P < .001, and r = 0.335, P = .009), and plantar flexor muscle strength (r = -0.469, P < .001, and r = 0.500, P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found associations between the degree of CS and remote muscle strength and endurance, suggesting that poor remote muscle performance is possibly a clinical sign of CS in people with CLBP.

Association between Opioid Dose, Acute Post-operative Pain and Walking Distance Following Lumbar Spine Surgery.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The opioid doses on post-operative day 1 (POD1) is a major predictor of recovery in patients following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). However, the opioid doses vary widely in clinical practice. Thus, the objective of this study was to explore the associations between opioid doses on POD1, pain and function during a hospital stay in patients following LSS. METHODS: This study used medical records of patients who underwent LSS between January 2007 and March 2018. The patients were divided into three groups (high, medium and low dose) according to the amount of opioid (oral morphine equivalents; OME) taken on POD1. A propensity score matching across the three groups was performed to account for main confounding factors related to the opioid dose, pain intensity and gait distance, which identified 114 matched patients in each group. The difference of pain intensity and gait distance between the groups on POD1 was analysed. RESULTS: The OME in each group on POD1 was 168.75 ± 69.50 mg (high), 65.92 ± 13.28 mg (medium) and 16.90 ± 9.80 mg (low) (P < .0001). Pain intensity on the postoperative day 2 (POD2) and 3 (POD3) was not different between the groups (P > .05). Gait distance on POD2 and POD3 was different between the groups but did not reach the adjusted statistically significant level of 0.017: high (170.3 ± 152.77 feet) versus medium (247.57 ± 216.65 feet) dose on POD2 (P = .04); high (179.31 ± 135.722 feet) versus low (230.94 ± 145.74 feet) dose on POD3 (P = .03); and medium (196.98 ± 159.42 feet) versus low (261.00 ± 161.03 feet) dose on POD3 (P = .09). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that high dose opioids on POD1 did not translate into better outcomes of pain and gait in patients following LSS. In fact, patients in medium and low dose groups walked a greater distance on POD2 and POD3. Use of a functional outcome such as gait should be considered to optimize opioid dose effects.

A Subgroup of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Central Sensitization.

BACKGROUND: Our knowledge of central sensitization (CS) in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is limited. 2011 fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales (2011 FM survey) have been used to determine FM positive as a surrogate of CS. The major features of CS including widespread hyperalgesia and dysfunction of the descending inhibitory pathways can be identified by pressure pain threshold (PPT) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) tests. The purpose of the study was to examine neurophysiological characteristics and psychosocial symptoms in a subgroup of FM-positive CLBP compared with FM-negative CLBP patients. METHODS: A total of 46 participants with CLBP and 22 pain-free controls completed outcome measures of the 2011 FM survey, PPT and CPM tests, and psychosocial questionnaires. Differences between FM-positive and FM-negative CLBP participants on these measures and correlations were analyzed. RESULTS: The 2011 FM survey identified 22 (48%) participants with CLBP as FM positive. FM-positive CLBP participants showed lower PPT values of the thumbnail (P=0.011) and lower back (P=0.003), lower CPM values of the thumbnail (P=0.002), and more severe pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression symptoms (P<0.05) than FM-negative CLBP participants. The 2011 FM scores were significantly correlated with the PPT and CPM values of the thumbnail and with psychosocial symptoms (P<0.001). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a subgroup of CLBP patients exhibiting with signs and symptoms of CS. Associations between subjective and objective CS measures indicate that the 2011 FM survey can be utilized to identify the presence of CS in CLBP in clinical practice.