Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
JSLS ; 26(3)2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35967962

RESUMO

Objective: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication has become the gold standard in treating esophageal achalasia and robotic surgical platform represents its natural evolution. The objective of our study was to assess durable long-term clinical outcomes in our cohort. Methods and Procedures: Between June 1, 1999 and June 30, 2019, 111 patients underwent minimally invasive treatment for achalasia (96 laparoscopically and 15 robotically). Fifty-two were males. Mean age was 49 years (20 - 96). Esophageal manometry confirmed the diagnosis. Fifty patients underwent pH monitoring study, with pathologic reflux in 18. Preoperative esophageal dilation was performed in 76 patients and 21 patients received botulin injection. Dysphagia was universally present, and mean duration was 96 months (5 - 480). Results: Median operative time was 144 minutes (90 - 200). One patient required conversion to open approach. Four mucosal perforations occurred in the laparoscopic group and were repaired intraoperatively. Seven patients underwent completion esophageal myotomy and added Dor fundoplication. Upper gastrointestinal series was performed before discharge. Median hospital stay was 39 hours (24 - 312). Median follow up was 157 months (6 - 240), and dysphagia was resolved in 94% of patients. Seven patients required postoperative esophageal dilation. Conclusions: Minimally invasive Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication are feasible. The operation is challenging, but excellent results hinge on the operative techniques and experience. The high dexterity, three-dimensional view, and the ergonomic movements of robotic surgery allow application of all the technical elements, achieving the best durable outcome for the patient. Robotic surgery is the natural evolution of minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Acalasia Esofágica , Miotomia de Heller , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Transtornos de Deglutição/cirurgia , Acalasia Esofágica/cirurgia , Feminino , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
JSLS ; 24(1)2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32206010

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic fundoplication is now a cornerstone in the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with sliding hernia. The best outcomes are achieved in those patients who have some response to medical treatment compared to those who do not. Robotic fundoplication is considered a novel approach in treating GERD with large paraesophageal hiatal hernias. Our goal was to examine the feasibility of this technique. METHODS: Seventy patients (23 males and 47 females) with mean age 64 y old (22-92), preoperatively diagnosed with a large paraesophageal hiatal hernia, were treated with a robotic approach. Biosynthetic tissue absorbable mesh was applied for hiatal closure reinforcement. Fifty-eight patients underwent total fundoplication, 11 patients had partial fundoplication, and one patient had a Collis-Nissen fundoplication for acquired short esophagus. RESULTS: All procedures were completed robotically, without laparoscopic or open conversion. Mean operative time was 223 min (180-360). Mean length of stay was 38 h (24-96). Median follow-up was 29 mo (7-51). Moderate postoperative dysphagia was noted in eight patients, all of which resolved after 3 mo without esophageal dilation. No mesh-related complications were detected. There were six hernia recurrences. Four patients were treated with redo-robotic fundoplication, and two were treated medically. CONCLUSIONS: The success of robotic fundoplication depends on adhering to a few important technical principles. In our experience, the robotic surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with large paraesophageal hernias may afford the surgeon increased dexterity and is feasible with comparable outcomes compared with traditional laparoscopic approaches.


Assuntos
Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Hérnia Hiatal/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am Surg ; 84(12): 1945-1950, 2018 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30606353

RESUMO

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, associated with sliding or large paraesophageal hiatal hernia, represents a common clinical presentation. The repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias is still a challenge in minimally invasive surgery. Between March 2014 and August 2016, 50 patients (18 males and 32 females) underwent robotic fundoplication (17 sliding and 33 paraesophageal hernias). The mean age of the patients was 58 years. Biosynthetic mesh was used in 28 patients with paraesophageal hernia. The mean operative time was 115 minutes (90-132) in the sliding hiatal hernia group, whereas it was 200 minutes (180-210) in the paraesophageal hiatal hernia group. The mean hospital stay was 36 hours (24-96). Eight patients experienced mild dysphagia which resolved after four weeks. No postoperative dysphagia was recorded at 30-month median follow-up. We experienced one recurrence in the sliding hernia group and two recurrences in the paraesophageal hernia group, with two patients treated robotically. Robotic fundoplication in treating sliding hiatal hernia is feasible and safe but is more challenging in the large paraesophageal group. Improved patient outcomes hinge on the operative technique used and increasing surgeon experience. The increased dexterity that robotic surgery affords enables the esophageal surgeon to more adeptly apply the traditional principles of laparoscopic fundoplication.


Assuntos
Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/etiologia , Hérnia Hiatal/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Telas Cirúrgicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Am Surg ; 82(10): 1014-1017, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779996

RESUMO

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to have multiple advantages compared with open repair such as less postoperative pain and earlier resume of daily activities with a comparable recurrence rate. We speculate robotic inguinal hernia repair may yield equivalent benefits, while providing the surgeon added dexterity. One hundred consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs with mesh were performed with a mean age of 56 years (25-96). Fifty-six unilateral hernias and 22 bilateral hernias were repaired amongst 62 males and 16 females. Polypropylene mesh was used for reconstruction. All but, two patients were completed robotically. Mean operative time was 52 minutes per hernia repair (45-67). Five patients were admitted overnight based on their advanced age. Regular diet was resumed immediately. Postoperative pain was minimal and regular activity was achieved after an average of four days. One patient recurred after three months in our earlier experience and he was repaired robotically. Mean follow-up time was 12 months. These data, compared with laparoscopic approach, suggest similar recurrence rates and postoperative pain. We believe comparative studies with laparoscopic approach need to be performed to assess the role robotic surgery has in the treatment of inguinal hernia repair.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hérnia Inguinal/diagnóstico , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Medição de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Ann Surg ; 260(6): 1088-94, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25389924

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) have poorer survival than those with functional PNETs. Our objective was to identify risk factors for recurrence after resection to better define surveillance parameters to improve long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for NF-PNET patients who underwent resection at the University of Michigan from 1995 to 2012. Immunohistochemical staining of tissues from patients with and without disease recurrence was performed for Ki-67 and the macrophage marker CD68, as tumor-associated macrophages are important for PNET development and progression. Clinicopathological factors and patient outcomes were measured. RESULTS: Ninety-seven NF-PNET patients underwent surgical resection. There was a recurrence rate of 14.4% (14/97). The median time to recurrence was 0.61 years, with 10 (71%) patients recurring within the first 2 years. Six of 7 patients (86%) monitored at 6-month surveillance intervals were diagnosed with recurrence on their first computed tomographic scan or during the intervening intervals. By Cox proportional hazards analysis, the most significant independent risk factors for recurrence were higher grade, stage, and intraoperative blood loss. High CD68 score and Ki-67 index correlated with recurrence risk, and Ki-67 index inversely correlated with time to recurrence. In patients who otherwise had few risk factors, a high CD68 score was a significant prognostic factor for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NF-PNETs, risk factors associated with recurrence were high EBL, grade, stage, CD68 score, and Ki-67 index. The CD68 score was an important prognostic factor in patients who otherwise had few clinicopathological risk factors; therefore, the CD68 score should be considered when planning surveillance strategies. We recommend that NF-PNET patients at high risk of recurrence undergo initial surveillance every 3 months for 2 years after surgery.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Macrófagos/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Endossonografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Incidência , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Pediatr Surg ; 47(2): 394-6, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22325399
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA