Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 69(7): 633-54, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16608830

RESUMO

Radon is a well-established cause of lung cancer in miners. Residents of homes with high levels of radon are potentially also at risk. Although most individual studies of indoor radon have failed to demonstrate significant risks, results have generally been consistent with estimates from studies of miners. We studied 1474 incident lung cancer cases aged 40-79 yr in Connecticut, Utah, and southern Idaho. Population controls (n = 1811) were identified by random telephone screening and from lists of Medicare recipients, and were selected to be similar to cases on age, gender, and smoking 10 yr before diagnosis/interview using randomized recruitment. Complete residential histories and information on known lung cancer risk factors were obtained by in-person and telephone interviews. Radon was measured on multiple levels of past and current homes using 12-mo alpha-track etch detectors. Missing data were imputed using mean radon concentrations for informative subgroups of controls. Average radon exposures were lower than anticipated, with median values of 23 Bq/m3 in Connecticut and 45 Bq/m3 in Utah/southern Idaho. Overall, there was little association between time-weighted average radon exposures 5 to 25 yr prior to diagnosis/interview and lung cancer risk. The excess relative risk (ERR) associated with a 100-Bq/m3 increase in radon level was 0.002 (95% CI -0.21, 0.21) in the overall population, 0.134 (95% CI -0.23, 0.50) in Connecticut, and -0.112 (95% CI -0.34, 0.11) in Utah/Idaho. ERRs were higher for some subgroups less prone to misclassification, but there was no group with a statistically significant linear increase in risk. While results were consistent with the estimates from studies of miners, this study provides no evidence of an increased risk for lung cancer at the exposure levels observed.


Assuntos
Poluentes Radioativos do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Carcinógenos Ambientais/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Radônio/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Habitação , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Utah/epidemiologia
2.
Health Phys ; 87(5): 480-9, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15551786

RESUMO

The latency of occupational cancer was a key factor in the recent epidemic of lung cancer among U.S. uranium miners. A review of the epidemic and analysis of latency periods with a near lifetime follow-up found that among former and nonsmokers, the mean mid-induction latent period is nearly a constant at about 25 y, regardless of age at starting or magnitude of exposure. Among cigarette smokers, the mean is shorter (about 19 y). It is not influenced by age at start of smoking, amount smoked, or magnitude of exposure, but there is a marked shortening as the age at start of radiation exposure rises. These latency variables affect lifetime risk models. By disregarding the European radon mine exposures and waiting for strong evidence of lung cancer among U.S. uranium miners (ignoring the exposures occurring while waiting during the latency period), the epidemic became inevitable.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Mineração/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Urânio , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Med Hypotheses ; 59(4): 450-7, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12208187

RESUMO

The 'hot' sensation produced by exposure to pepper is apparently due to two natural carcinogens: capsaicin in chili type peppers and safrole in black/white pepper. There are four cookeries in the United States that are noted for their high pepper content: Mexican-American, Cajun, white Creole, and black Creole. Each is largely confined to a single ethnic-cultural group which is concentrated in some counties. By use of county population and mortality data, significantly higher rates for stomach and liver cancer were found in counties inhabited by these four ethnic-cultural groups than in matched control counties. This involved both sexes. The cancer increase was dependent on the concentration of these groups in a county. These results strengthen and extend an earlier case-control study which found odds ratios above 5 for the stomach cancer association with capsaicin pepper. It is further evidence that capsaicin is a human carcinogen.


Assuntos
Capsaicina/toxicidade , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/classificação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA