Interleukin family member ST2 and mortality in acute dyspnoea.

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to investigate the prognostic utility and patient-specific characteristics of ST2 (suppression of tumorigenicity 2), assessed with a novel sensitive assay. BACKGROUND: Suppression of tumorigenicity 2 signalling has been shown to be associated with death in cardiac and pulmonary diseases. DESIGN/SUBJECTS: In an international multicentre cohort design, we prospectively enrolled 1091 patients presenting with acute dyspnoea to the emergency department (ED). ST2 was measured in a blinded fashion using a novel assay and compared to B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP. The primary end-point was mortality within 30 days and 1 year. The prognostic value of ST2 was evaluated in comparison and in addition to BNP and NT-proBNP. RESULTS: Suppression of tumorigenicity 2 concentrations was higher amongst decedents than among survivors (median 85 vs. 43 U mL⁻¹, P < 0.001) and also higher in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) when compared with preserved LVEF (P < 0.001). In receiver operator characteristics analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for ST2, BNP and NT-proBNP to predict 30-day and 1-year mortality were 0.76, 0.63 and 0.71, and 0.72, 0.71 and 0.73, respectively. The combinations of ST2 with BNP or NT-proBNP improved prediction of mortality provided by BNP or NT-proBNP alone. After multivariable adjustment, ST2 values above the median (50 U mL⁻¹) significantly predicted 1-year mortality (HR 2.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting to the ED with acute dyspnoea, ST2 is a strong and independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality and might improve risk stratification already provided by BNP or NT-proBNP.

Use of B-type natriuretic peptide to predict blood pressure improvement after percutaneous revascularisation for renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) to predict blood pressure (BP) response in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) after renal angioplasty and stenting (PTRA). METHODS: In 120 patients with RAS and hypertension referred for PTRA, 24-h ambulatory BP recordings were obtained before and 6 months after intervention. BNP was measured before, 1 day and 6 months after PTRA. RESULTS: BP improved in 54% of patients. Median BNP levels pre-intervention were 97 pg ml(-1) (interquartile range (IQR) 35-250) and decreased significantly within 1 day of PTRA to 62 pg ml(-1) (IQR 24-182) (p < 0.001), remaining at 75 pg ml(-1) (IQR 31-190) at 6 months. The area under the receiver operating curve for pre-intervention BNP to predict BP improvement was 0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.67). Pre-intervention BNP >50 pg ml(-1) was seen in 79% of patients with BP improvement compared with 56% in patients without improvement (p = 0.01). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, BNP >50 pg ml(-1) was significantly associated with BP improvement (odds ratio (OR) 4.0, 95% CI 1.2-13.2). CONCLUSIONS: BNP levels are elevated in patients with RAS and decrease after revascularisation. Although BNP does not seem useful as a continuous variable, pre-interventional BNP >50 pg ml(-1) may be helpful to identify patients in whom PTRA will improve BP.