Brief Report: HIV Infection Does Not Explain Higher Nicotine Metabolism in People Living With HIV.

BACKGROUND: Smoking contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in people with HIV. People with HIV have relatively high nicotine metabolism rates, as measured by the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR, 3-hydroxycotinine/cotinine). A higher NMR is associated with difficulty quitting smoking. We hypothesized that HIV infection might upregulate nicotine metabolism. SETTING: A retrospective study of male current smokers in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study who HIV seroconverted between 1985 and 1993. METHODS: Eligibility included having plasma stored before and after confirmed HIV seroconversion and current tobacco use. Samples were selected from the closest available visits before (median 3.3 months) and after (median 9.4 months) seroconversion. Antiretroviral therapy use was exclusionary. Cotinine and 3-hydroxycotinine were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We compared NMR from plasma pre-HIV and post-HIV infection using signed-rank tests. We targeted a sample size of 71 pairs to achieve 80% power to detect a 0.1 unit increase in NMR with P = 0.05. RESULTS: We analyzed paired samples from 78 participants; the median age was 34.5 years [interquartile range (IQR 29-40 years)]. The median NMR pre-HIV and post-HIV was 0.45 (IQR 0.32-0.54) and 0.46 (IQR 0.34-0.56), respectively. The median change in NMR postseroconversion was +0.01 (IQR -0.05, +0.09), P = 0.25. Stratification of median change in NMR by timing between samples or time since HIV seroconversion did not alter this finding. CONCLUSIONS: Acquiring HIV had no measurable effect on NMR. We postulate that upregulation of the NMR may be due to direct pharmacologic effects of HIV medications or metabolic changes in response to HIV infection.

Risk of Invasive Anal Cancer in HIV-Infected Patients With High-Grade Anal Dysplasia: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The progression rate and predictors of anal dysplastic lesions to squamous cell carcinoma of the anus remain unclear. Characterizing these parameters may help refine anal cancer screening guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the rate of progression of high-grade anal dysplasia to invasive carcinoma in HIV-infected persons. DESIGN: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database linked to Medicare claims from 2000 to 2011, we identified HIV-infected subjects with incident anal intraepithelial neoplasia III. To estimate the rate of progression of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III to invasive cancer, we calculated the cumulative incidence of anal cancer in this cohort. We then fitted Poisson models to evaluate the potential risk factors for incident anal cancer. SETTINGS: This is a population-based study. PATIENTS: Included were 592 HIV-infected subjects with incident anal intraepithelial neoplasia III. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was incident squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. RESULTS: Study subjects were largely male (95%) with a median age of 45.7 years. Within the median follow-up period of 69 months, 33 subjects progressed to anal cancer. The incidence of anal cancer was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.5%) and 5.7% (95% CI, 4.0%-8.1%) at 1 and 5 years, following a diagnosis of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III. Risk of progression did not differ by anal intraepithelial neoplasia III treatment status. On unadjusted analysis, black race (p = 0.02) and a history of anogenital condylomata (p = 0.03) were associated with an increased risk of anal cancer incidence, whereas prior anal cytology screening was associated with a decreased risk (p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: The identification of some incident cancer episodes used surrogate measures. CONCLUSIONS: In our population-based cohort of HIV-infected subjects with long-term follow-up, the risk of progression from anal intraepithelial neoplasia III to anal squamous cell carcinoma was higher than reported in other studies and was not associated with the receipt of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III treatment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A933.

A Population-Based Cohort Analysis of Chemoradiation Versus Radiation Alone for Definitive Treatment of Stage I Anal Cancer in Older Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the benefit of chemoradiation over radiation therapy alone has been shown in randomized trials for stage II to III squamous cell of the anus, this benefit is not clear for patients with stage I cancer. Nevertheless, most societal recommendations endorse chemoradiation for patients with stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus despite the lack of proven benefit and potential increase in toxicity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether outcomes are improved with the addition of chemotherapy versus radiation alone for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. DESIGN: This was a cohort analysis using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry linked to Medicare from 1996 to 2011. Propensity-score methods were used to control for potential confounding. SETTINGS: This was a population-based study. PATIENTS: Medicare eligible patients (age >65 y or with an eligible disability) with stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated with either definitive radiation alone or chemoradiation were included. INTERVENTIONS: Radiation or chemoradiation was the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, colostomy-free survival, and acute or late toxicities were measured. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus were identified who received chemoradiation versus 99 treated with lone radiotherapy. Median age was 72 years and did not differ by treatment (p = 0.6). Patients receiving chemoradiation had improved unadjusted overall survival compared with lone radiotherapy, but after adjustment using propensity-score methods there was no difference in overall survival (HR = 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.0)), cause-specific survival (HR = 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.6)), colostomy-free survival (HR = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5-2.5)), or disease-free survival (HR = 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.4)). Chemoradiation was associated with an increased risk of select early and late toxicities. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective series from an anonymous database. The data might not be relevant for younger, healthier patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lone radiation may be associated with adequate oncologic outcomes when used to treat older and sicker patients with stage I anal cancer. Physicians should discuss the potential benefits and harms of adding chemotherapy for the treatment of these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A628.

Differences in the Immune Microenvironment of Anal Cancer Precursors by HIV Status and Association With Ablation Outcomes.

Background: Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) are the precursors to anal cancer and frequently persist or recur following electrocautery ablation (EA). Impaired mucosal immunity may facilitate anal carcinogenesis. We characterized the immune microenvironment of anal HSILs in correlation with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serostatus and ablation outcomes. Methods: Using immunohistochemistry, mucosa-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes were quantified in HSILs and benign mucosa from 70 HIV+ and 45 HIV- patients. Clinicopathological parameters were compared. Results: Anal HSILs harbored more T lymphocytes than benign mucosa regardless of HIV status (P ≤ .03). Total T lymphocyte count and CD8+ subset were significantly higher in HIV+ HSILs versus HIV- HSILs (median cell count, 71 vs 47; 47 vs 22/high power field [HPF]; P < .001), whereas the CD4+ subset was comparable between groups (median, 24 vs. 25; P = .40). Post EA, HSILs persisted in 41% of HIV+ and 19% of HIV- patients (P = .04). Unadjusted analysis showed trends toward EA failures associated with HIV seropositivity (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.0; 95% CI, .8-4.9) and increased CD8+ cells (IRR, 2.3; 95% CI, .9-5.3). Conclusions: Human immunodeficiency virus is associated with alterations of the immune microenvironment of anal HSILs manifested by increased local lymphocytic infiltrates, predominately CD8+. Human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity and excess mucosa-infiltrating CD8+ cells may be associated with ablation resistance.

High Rates of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in HIV-Infected Women Who Do Not Meet Screening Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women have a higher burden of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and anal cancer (AC) compared with HIV-uninfected women. Guidelines for AC screening in this population are heterogeneous. Here we report outcomes and risk factors for anal HSIL following implementation of universal AC screening offered to all HIV-infected women. METHODS: Data from women who underwent AC screening with anal cytology from April 2009 to July 2014 were analyzed. Routine clinical data included anal and cervical cytology, demographic/behavioral data, and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) results. We evaluated the association of cytology with HRA results, and predictors of HSIL pathology, and compared rates of HSIL pathology among women meeting screening guidelines to those who did not. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five HIV-infected women were screened with anal cytology. Thirty-nine percent had abnormal anal cytology on initial screen and 15% on secondary screen; 208 women underwent HRA following abnormal anal cytology. HSIL was found in 26% and 18% of anal biopsies following initial and secondary screening, respectively. One woman had AC. Cigarette smoking more than doubled HSIL risk. Among women who underwent AC screening despite not meeting existing guideline criteria, 21% and 10%, respectively, were found to have HSIL on biopsy. Neither meeting criteria for screening nor history of receptive anal sex was significantly associated with HSIL. CONCLUSIONS: Anal HSIL is common in HIV-infected women. Substantial numbers of HSIL would have been missed by strictly adhering to existing AC screening guidelines. These results support routine screening of all HIV-infected women regardless of human papillomavirus history or sexual practices.