Patient and operative factors influence delayed discharge following bariatric surgery in an enhanced recovery setting.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been widely adopted in bariatric surgery. However, not all patients are successfully managed in the ERAS setting and there is currently little way of predicting the patients who will deviate from the program. Early identification of these patients could allow for more tailored protocols to be implemented preoperatively to address the issues, thereby improving patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to elucidate the factors which preclude discharge by comparing patients who were successfully discharged by the end of the first postoperative day (POD 0/1) to those who stayed longer, including revisional surgery in this analysis. SETTING: A tertiary, high-volume Bariatric Centre, United Kingdom. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery in a single centre in 1 year. Multivariate analyses compared patient and operative variables between patients who were discharged on POD 0/1 and those who stayed longer. RESULTS: A total of 288 bariatric operations were performed: 78% of operations performed were laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; 22% laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Of these cases, 13% were revisional operations. Four patients returned to theatre on the index admission. 81% of patients were discharged by POD 0/1. A re-presentation within 30 days was seen in 6% of patients. There was no significant difference in length of stay for the type of operation performed (P = .86). Patients who had a revisional procedure were not more likely to stay longer. Length of stay was also independent of age, BMI, and comorbidities. Caucasian patients were more likely to be discharged on POD 0/1 than those of other ethnicities (90% versus 78%; P = .02). Operations performed by trainee surgeons, under consultant supervision, were significantly more likely to be discharged on POD 0/1 (P = .03). However, a logistic regression analysis was unable to predict patients who had a prolonged stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patient length of stay is independent of BMI, operation, and comorbidities and these factors do not need special consideration in ERAS pathways. Patients undergoing revisional procedures can be managed in the same way as those having primary procedures, with a routine POD 0/1 discharge. However, the impact of individual patient factors, and their interaction, is complex and cannot predict overstay.

Splenic Abscess Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review of Clinical Presentation and Management Methods.

BACKGROUND: Splenic abscess is a rare complication following sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to clarify its clinical significance, presentation, and management. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to the 19th of July 2020. A total of 18 patients were included, of which 11 were female and 7 were male. The mean age was 34.1 ± 12.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 45.8 ± 7.6 kg/m2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was reported in 11.1% of patients and hypertension in 22.2%. Fever was the most common presenting symptom seen in 17 (94.4%) patients, followed by abdominal pain in 10 (55.6%). The mean duration from surgery to presentation was 98.6 ± 132.7 days (range 10-547 days). Computed tomography was used for investigations in 17/18 (94.4%) patients. Seven patients had reported leak, three reported bleeding, and 2 reported pleural effusion. Thirteen patients had unilocular abscess. All patients were treated with antibiotics. Four patients needed total parenteral nutrition, and three were given proton pump inhibitor. In total, 11 patients needed percutaneous drainage as a part of treatment and 11 patients needed total splenectomy and 1 needed partial splenectomy. CONCLUSION: Splenic abscess following sleeve gastrectomy is a rare identity. The etiology of formation of splenic abscess needs further studies. A computed tomography of the abdomen with contrast is the preferred diagnostic tool. There is no gold standard treatment for splenic abscess.

The Effect of Participation in Tier 3 Services on the Uptake of Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recognised advantages of bariatric and metabolic surgery, only a small proportion of patients receive this intervention. In the UK, weight management systems are divided into four tiers. Tier 3 is a clinician-lead weight loss service while tier 4 considers surgery. While there is little evidence that tier 3 has any long-term benefits for weight loss, this study aims to determine whether tier 3 improves the uptake of surgery. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of all referrals to our unit between 2013 and 2016 was categorised according to source-tier 3, directly from the general practitioner (GP) or from another speciality. The likelihood of surgery was calculated using a regression model after considering patient demographics, comorbidities and distance from our hospital. RESULTS: Of the 399 patients, 69.2% were referred directly from the GP, 21.3% from tier 3, and 9.5% from another speciality of which 69.4%, 56.2%, and 36.8% progressed to surgery (p = 0.01). On regression analysis, patients from another speciality or GP were more likely to decide against surgery (OR 2.44 CI 1.13-6.80 p = 0.03 and OR 1.65 CI 1.10-3.12 p = 0.04 respectively) and more likely to be deemed not suitable for surgery by the MDT (OR 6.42 CI 1.25-33.1 p = 0.02 and OR 3.47 CI 1.11-12.9 p = 0.03) compared with tier 3 referrals. CONCLUSION: As patients from tier 3 were more likely to undergo bariatric and metabolic surgery, this intervention remains a relevant step in the pathway. Such patients are likely to be better informed about the benefits of surgery and risks of severe obesity.

Is Bariatric Surgery Better than Nonsurgical Weight Loss for Improving Asthma Control? A Systematic Review.

Obesity is associated with increased severity of asthma. Bariatric surgery can be effective in weight loss and improvement in asthma. Two reviewers conducted a systematic review using search terms: 'weight loss', 'bariatric surgery', and 'asthma'. Adult studies including all bariatric procedures and nonsurgical weight loss regimes were included. Thirty-nine studies, including twenty-six bariatric studies and thirteen nonsurgical studies, were found. No study directly compared bariatric surgery to nonsurgical techniques. Bariatric surgery offered greater weight loss (22-36%) than nonsurgical programmes (4.1-14.2%) and more consistently improved medication use, airway hyperresponsiveness, hospitalisation rate or ED attendance and lung function, while change in inflammatory markers were variable. Bariatric surgery appears to be superior in treating asthma; however, further study on surgery for both mild and severe asthma is required.

The Complex Association Between Bariatric Surgery and Depression: a National Nested-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Although bariatric surgery has been shown to reduce weight loss and obesity-related conditions, an improvement in depression remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether bariatric surgery is associated with a resolution of depression, and the prevention of its onset. METHOD: Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 who had undergone bariatric surgery were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), matched 5:1 to controls. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of developing de novo depression. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared the proportion of patients with no further consultations related to depression between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 3534 patients who underwent surgery, of which 2018 (57%) had pre-existing depression, were matched to 15,480 controls. Cox proportional hazard modelling demonstrated surgery was associated with a HR of 1.50 (95% CI 1.32-1.71, p < 0.005) for developing de novo depression. For those with pre-existing depression, by 5 years, just over 20% of post-surgical patients had no further depression episodes compared with 17% of controls. CONCLUSION: In individuals with a history of depression, bariatric surgery is associated with an improvement in mental health. On the contrary, the finding of increased de novo diagnoses of depression following surgery indicates the need for further study of the mechanisms by which bariatric surgery is associated with depression in this subset of patients.

Impact of COVID-19 on Obesity Management Services in the United Kingdom (The COMS-UK study).

Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) has had a severe impact on all aspects of global healthcare delivery. This study aimed to investigate the nationwide impact of the pandemic on obesity management services in the UK in a questionnaire-based survey conducted of professionals involved in the delivery. A total of 168 clinicians took the survey; the majority of which maintained their usual clinical roles and were not redeployed except physicians and nurse specialists. Nearly all (97.8%) elective bariatric surgery was cancelled, 67.3% of units cancelled all multidisciplinary meeting activity, and the majority reduced clinics (69.6%). Most respondents anticipated that the services would recommence within 1-3 months. This study found that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe impact on the services involved in the management of patients suffering from severe, complex obesity in the UK.

Stage at Diagnosis and Survival of Colorectal Cancer With or Without Underlying Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-based Study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is a risk factor for colorectal cancer [CRC]. The aim of this study is to determine whether stage at diagnosis and survival differ between sporadic, ulcerative colitis [UC]- and Crohn's disease [CD]-related CRC. METHODS: The English National Cancer Registry [NCIN], Hospital Episode Statistics [HES] and Office for National Statistics [ONS] datasets between 2000 and 2010 were linked, providing data on comorbidities, stage and date of death. A logistic regression model determined whether IBD was associated with an early [I/II] or late [III/IV] cancer. Cox regression analysis was used to examine survival differences between sporadic, UC- and CD-related cancers. RESULTS: A total of 234 009 patients with CRC were included, of whom 985 [0.4%] and 1922 [0.8%] had CD and UC, respectively. UC, but not CD, was associated with an earlier stage compared with sporadic cancers (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 0.98, p = 0.02). CD had a significantly worse survival compared with sporadic patients for stage II [HR = 1.71, CI 1.26 to 2.31 p <0.005] and III [1.53, CI 1.20 to 1.96, p <0.005] cancer. UC patients were associated with worse survival compared with the sporadic group for both stage III [1.38, CI 1.17 to 1.63, p <0.0005] and IV [1.13, CI 1.01 to 1.28, p = 0.04] cancer. After excluding sporadic patients, UC was associated with improved survival compared with CD [0.62, CI 0.43 to 0.90, p = 0.01] for stage II cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD are diagnosed at an earlier stage but tend to have a worse survival compared with sporadic cases of CRC, in particular for nodal disease [stage III].Specifically, patients with CD-related CRC appear to fare worst in terms of survival compared with both the sporadic and UC groups.

Effect of Health Care Provider Delays on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Multicenter Population-Based Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom has lower survival figures for all types of cancers compared to many European countries despite similar national expenditures on health. This discrepancy may be linked to long diagnostic and treatment delays. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether delays experienced by patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) affect their survival. METHODS: This observational study utilized the Somerset Cancer Register to identify patients with CRC who were diagnosed on the basis of positive histology findings. The effects of diagnostic and treatment delays and their subdivisions on outcomes were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to illustrate group differences. RESULTS: A total of 648 patients (375 males, 57.9% males) were included in this study. We found that neither diagnostic delay nor treatment delay had an effect on the overall survival in patients with CRC (χ23=1.5, P=.68; χ23=0.6, P=.90, respectively). Similarly, treatment delays did not affect the outcomes in patients with CRC (χ23=5.5, P=.14). The initial Cox regression analysis showed that patients with CRC who had short diagnostic delays were less likely to die than those experiencing long delays (hazard ratio 0.165, 95% CI 0.044-0.616; P=.007). However, this result was nonsignificant following sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and treatment delays had no effect on the survival of this cohort of patients with CRC. The utility of the 2-week wait referral system is therefore questioned. Timely screening with subsequent early referral and access to diagnostics may have a more beneficial effect.

Delays in referral from primary care worsen survival for patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Delays in referral for patients with colorectal cancer may occur if the presenting symptom is falsely attributed to a benign condition. AIM: To investigate whether delays in referral from primary care are associated with a later stage of cancer at diagnosis and worse prognosis. DESIGN AND SETTING: A national retrospective cohort study in England including adult patients with colorectal cancer identified from the cancer registry with linkage to Clinical Practice Research Datalink, who had been referred following presentation to their GP with a 'red flag' or 'non-specific' symptom. METHOD: The hazard ratios (HR) of death were calculated for delays in referral of between 2 weeks and 3 months, and >3 months, compared with referrals within 2 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 4527 (63.5%) patients with colon cancer and 2603 (36.5%) patients with rectal cancer were included in the study. The percentage of patients presenting with red-flag symptoms who experienced a delay of >3 months before referral was 16.9% of those with colon cancer and 13.5% of those with rectal cancer, compared with 35.7% of patients with colon cancer and 42.9% of patients with rectal cancer who presented with non-specific symptoms. Patients referred after 3 months with red-flag symptoms demonstrated a significantly worse prognosis than patients who were referred within 2 weeks (colon cancer: HR 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29 to 1.81; rectal cancer: HR 1.30; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.60). This association was not seen for patients presenting with non-specific symptoms. Delays in referral were associated with a significantly higher proportion of late-stage cancers. CONCLUSION: The first presentation to the GP provides a referral opportunity to identify the underlying cancer, which, if missed, is associated with a later stage in diagnosis and worse survival.

Reintervention After Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in England.

BACKGROUND: After antireflux surgery, highly variable rates of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To identify the occurrence and risk factors of recurrent GERD requiring surgical reintervention or medication. METHODS: The Hospital Episode Statistics database was used to identify adults in England receiving primary antireflux surgery for GERD in 2000 to 2012 with follow-up through 2014, and the outcome was surgical reintervention. In a subset of participants, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink was additionally used to assess proton pump inhibitor therapy for at least 6 months (medical reintervention). Risk factors were assessed using multivariable Cox regression providing adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Among 22,377 patients who underwent primary antireflux surgery in the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset, 811 (3.6%) had surgical reintervention, with risk factors being age 41 to 60 years (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44), female sex (HR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.74), white ethnicity (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.77), and low hospital annual volume of antireflux surgery (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.67). Among 2005 patients who underwent primary antireflux surgery in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink dataset, 189 (9.4%) had surgical reintervention and 1192 (59.5%) used proton pump inhibitor therapy, with risk factors for the combined outcome being age >60 years (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.81-3.13) and preoperative psychiatric morbidity (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.25-1.99). CONCLUSION: At least 3.6% of patients may require surgical reintervention and 59.5% medical therapy following antireflux surgery in England. The influence of patient characteristics and hospital volume highlights the need for patient selection and surgical experience in successful antireflux surgery.

Delays in referral from primary care are associated with a worse survival in patients with esophagogastric cancer.

NICE referral guidelines for suspected cancer were introduced to improve prognosis by reducing referral delays. However, over 20% of patients with esophagogastric cancer experience three or more consultations before referral. In this retrospective cohort study, we hypothesize that such a delay is associated with a worse survival compared with patients referred earlier. By utilizing Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a national primary care linked database, the first presentation, referral date, a number of consultations before referral and stage for esophagogastric cancer patients were determined. The risk of a referral after one or two consultations compared with three or more consultations was calculated for age and the presence of symptom fulfilling the NICE criteria. The risk of death according to the number of consultations before referral was determined, while accounting for stage and surgical management. 1307 patients were included. Patients referred after one (HR 0.80 95% CI 0.68-0.93 p = 0.005) or two consultations (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.67-0.98 p = 0.034) demonstrated significantly improved prognosis compared with those referred later. The risk of death was also lower for patients who underwent a resection, were younger or had an earlier stage at diagnosis. Those presenting with a symptom fulfilling the NICE criteria (OR 0.27 95% CI 0.21-0.35 p < 0.0001) were more likely to be referred earlier. This is the first study to demonstrate an association between a delay in referral and worse prognosis in esophagogastric patients. These findings should prompt further research to reduce primary care delays.

Comparison of cancer diagnosis recording between the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Cancer Registry and Hospital Episodes Statistics.

INTRODUCTION: The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is a large electronic dataset of primary care medical records. For the purpose of epidemiological studies, it is necessary to ensure accuracy and completeness of cancer diagnoses in CPRD. METHOD: Cases included had a colorectal, oesophagogastric (OG), breast, prostate or lung cancer diagnosis recorded in a least one of CPRD, Cancer Registry (CR) or Hospital Episodes Statistics(HES) between 2000 and 2013. Agreement in diagnosis between the datasets, difference in dates, survival at one and five-years, and whether patient characteristics differed according to the dataset or the timing of diagnosis were investigated. RESULTS: 116,769 patients were included. For each cancer, approximately 10% of cases identified from CPRD or HES were not confirmed in the CR. 25.5% colorectal, 26.0% OG, 8.9% breast, 32.0% lung and 18.6% prostate cases identified from the CR were missing in CPRD. The diagnosis date was recorded later in CPRD compared with CR for each cancer, ranging from 81.1% for prostate to 59.6% for colorectal, especially if the diagnosis was an emergency. Compared with the CR and HES, the adjusted risk of a missing diagnosis in CPRD was significantly higher if the patient was older, had more co-morbidities or was diagnosed as an emergency. Survival at one and five-years was highest for CPRD. CONCLUSION: Patient demographics and the route of diagnosis impact the accuracy of cancer diagnosis in CPRD. Although CPRD provides invaluable primary care data, patients should ideally be identified from the CR to reduce bias.

The Influence of Antireflux Surgery on Esophageal Cancer Risk in England: National Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how antireflux surgery influences the risk of esophageal cancer in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett esophagus. BACKGROUND: GERD is a major risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the United Kingdom has the highest incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma globally. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics database was used to identify all patients in England aged over 18 years diagnosed with GERD with or without Barrett Esophagus from 2000 to 2012, with antireflux surgery being the exposure investigated. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) was used to provide a sensitivity analysis comparing proton pump inhibitor therapy and antireflux surgery. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability weights based on the probability of having surgery to adjust for selection bias and confounding factors. RESULTS: (i) Hospital Episode Statistics analysis; among 838,755 included patients with GERD and 28,372 with Barrett esophagus, 22,231 and 737 underwent antireflux surgery, respectively. In GERD patients, antireflux surgery reduced the risk of esophageal cancer (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.78). In Barrett esophagus patients, the corresponding HR was (HR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.12-1.90).(ii) CPRD analysis; antireflux surgery was associated with decreased point estimates of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with GERD (0% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.16) and Barrett esophagus (HR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.21-2.63), but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Antireflux surgery may be associated with a reduced risk of esophageal cancer risk, however it remains primarily an operation for symptomatic relief.

The impact of discussing preoperative fasting with patients.

Patients awaiting surgery are often fasted preoperatively well in excess of the recommended fasting times. Educated perioperative practitioners were asked to discuss preoperative starvation with patients. Preoperative starvation period for clear fluids was significantly reduced from a mean of 8 hours 30 minutes in the original audit, to 6 hours 10 minutes in this study of 113 patients (p < 0.001). Improving patient understanding of preoperative fasting can increase compliance with fasting recommendations.

Blood pressure oscillations during tilt testing as a predictive marker of vasovagal syncope.

AIMS: During head-up tilt (HUT) testing, a period of haemodynamic instability, marked by oscillations in blood pressure, often precedes vasovagal syncope. We hypothesized that the presence of oscillations in blood pressure during HUT testing predicts a positive diagnosis for vasovagal syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: The haemodynamic profiles of 42 consecutive patients non-responsive to passive HUT and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) provocation ('non-responders') and, contemporaneously, 41 consecutive patients responsive to passive HUT and GTN provocation ('responders') were assigned oscillation-positive or oscillation-negative depending on the presence or absence of a characteristic oscillation in systolic blood pressure which varied by > or =30 mmHg (peak-to-trough). All the non-responders proceeded to an isoprenaline (Iso) challenge test. Of the 42 non-responders, 27 patients were Iso tilt-positive; all of these patients were assigned oscillation-positive. The other 15 non-responders were Iso tilt-negative; of these 9 were assigned oscillation-positive and 6 were assigned oscillation-negative. Of the 41 responder patients, 33 were assigned oscillation-positive, whereas 8 were assigned oscillation-negative. Overall, the presence of oscillations as a diagnostic predictor for vasovagal syncope had a sensitivity of 88% (positive predictive value of 87%) and a specificity of 40% (negative predictive value of 43%). CONCLUSION: In patients non-responsive to passive HUT and GTN provocation, the presence of an oscillating systolic blood pressure varying > or =30 mmHg may still indicate a diagnosis of vasovagal syncope, possibly obviating the need for Iso testing.