Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
Oral Dis ; 29(5): 1959-1966, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35359030

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyse the trends in the incidence of oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) across Australia from 1982 to 2017 with implications for prevention. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Australian Cancer Database (ACD) compiled at the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Joinpoint analyses are presented. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There was a striking increase of age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) of OPC by over 1.5 times; the most significant rise was between 2007 and 2017 with an annual percentage change (APC) of +5.24% (p < 0.001). Slow but gradual growth of ASIR was observed amongst women with a statistically significant APC of +1.02% (p < 0.001). Statistically significant bimodal increasing trends of APC were also observed in total ASIR of OPC. These rising trends are widely attributed to increased oral sex practices. The highest number of incident cases was found in patients aged 55-69 years attributable to continued alcohol and tobacco exposure. The most common subsites affected were base of the tongue (BOT) and 'oropharynx' from 1982 to 2017. CONCLUSION: Oropharyngeal cancer is rising rapidly across Australia, particularly in men. Whilst the national proportion of cases driven by HPV is not known, it is evident that vaccination is yet to have an impact.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Austrália/epidemiologia , Incidência , Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(7): 3539-3562, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156403

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this sub-analysis was to highlight the MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral mucositis (OM) in pediatric patients and to present unique considerations in this patient population. METHODS: This sub-analysis of the pediatric patient population is based on the systematic review conducted by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISSO) published in 2019/2020. Studies were scored and assigned a level of evidence based on previously published criteria. Data regarding adverse effects and compliance was collected from the original publications. RESULTS: A total of 45 papers were included and assessed in this sub-analysis, including 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Chewing gum was demonstrated to be not effective in preventing OM in pediatric cancer patients in 2 RCTs. The efficacy of all other interventions could not be determined based on the available literature. CONCLUSION: There is limited or conflicting evidence about interventions for the management of OM in pediatric cancer patients, except for chewing gum which was ineffective for prevention. Therefore, currently, data from adult studies may need to be extrapolated for the management of pediatric patients. Honey and photobiomodulation therapy in this patient population had encouraging potential. Implementation of a basic oral care protocol is advised amid lack of high level of evidence studies.


Assuntos
Estomatite/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Guias como Assunto , Humanos
4.
Cancer ; 126(19): 4423-4431, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32786044

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mucositis is a significant toxicity of cancer therapy with numerous systemic sequelae. The goal of this systematic review was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of mucositis. METHODS: The literature was reviewed systematically to identify interventions for mucositis. Studies were rated according to the presence of major and minor flaws according to previously published criteria. The body of evidence for each intervention and in each treatment setting was assigned a level of evidence based on previously published criteria. Guidelines were developed based on the level of evidence, with 3 possible guideline determinations: recommendation, suggestion, or no guideline possible. RESULTS: The guideline covers evidence from 1197 publications related to oral or gastrointestinal mucositis. Thirteen new guidelines were developed for or against the use of various interventions in specific treatment settings, and 11 previous guidelines were confirmed after aa review of new evidence. Thirteen previously established guidelines were carried over because there was no new evidence for these interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The updated MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis provide professional health caregivers with a clinical setting-specific, evidence-based tool to help with the management of mucositis in patients who have cancer.


Assuntos
Mucosite/etiologia , Mucosite/terapia , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(5): 2457-2472, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32056010

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To update the clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral mucositis (OM) that were developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). This part focuses on honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each clinical setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2014 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, one of the following guidelines were determined: Recommendation, Suggestion, No Guideline Possible. RESULTS: A total of 78 papers were identified within the scope of this section, of which 49 were included in this review and merged with nine publications that were reported in the previous guidelines update. A new Suggestion was made for honey (combined topical and systemic delivery) for the prevention of OM in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. A new Suggestion clarified that chewing gum is not effective for the prevention of OM in pediatric patients with hematological or solid cancer treated with chemotherapy. No guideline was possible for other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous natural products and herbal remedies were studied for the management of OM. Of the agents reviewed in this systematic review, a guideline in favor was made for honey (combined topical and systemic), while a guideline against was made for chewing gum. Additional research is warranted to clarify the potential of other interventions.


Assuntos
Mel , Mucosite/tratamento farmacológico , Plantas Medicinais , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Saliva/metabolismo , Estomatite/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Goma de Mascar , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Saliva/efeitos dos fármacos
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(10): 3997-4010, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286229

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of natural and miscellaneous agents for the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer / International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2014 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, the following guidelines were determined: Recommendation, Suggestion, and No Guideline Possible. RESULTS: A total of 78 papers were identified within the scope of this section, out of which 29 were included in this part, and were analyzed with 27 previously reviewed studies. A new Suggestion was made for oral glutamine for the prevention of OM in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients receiving radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy. The previous Recommendation against the use of parenteral glutamine for the prevention of OM in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients was re-established. A previous Suggestion for zinc to prevent OM in H&N cancer patients treated with radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy was reversed to No Guideline Possible. No guideline was possible for other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Of the vitamins, minerals, and nutritional supplements studied for the management of OM, the evidence supports a Recommendation against parenteral glutamine in HSCT patients and a Suggestion in favor of oral glutamine in H&N cancer patients for the management of OM.


Assuntos
Glutamina/uso terapêutico , Minerais/uso terapêutico , Mucosite/tratamento farmacológico , Mucosite/prevenção & controle , Estomatite/tratamento farmacológico , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Glutamina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(10): 3985-3995, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286230

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of anti-inflammatory agents in the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/ International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) subcommittee on mucositis guideline update. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the clinical practice guidelines published in 2014. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, and no guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 11 new papers across five interventions were examined. The recommendation for the use of benzydamine mouthwash for the prevention of radiotherapy-induced mucositis remained unchanged. New suggestion for the use of the same for prevention of mucositis associated with chemoradiotherapy was made. No guideline was possible for any other anti-inflammatory agents due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Of the anti-inflammatory agents studied for oral mucositis, the evidence supports the use of benzydamine mouthwash in the specific populations listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on other (class of agents) interventions and in other cancer treatment settings.


Assuntos
Mucosite/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Estomatite/terapia , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzidamina/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
8.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 48(11): 1456-1469, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31078366

RESUMO

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether there are clinically effective reductions in postoperative pain, oedema, and trismus following submucosal dexamethasone administration during impacted mandibular third molar surgery. An electronic database search was conducted up to and including June 2018. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing the effects of submucosal dexamethasone in adult patients undergoing mandibular third molar surgery were included. The mean differences or standardized mean differences were extracted and pooled using the fixed-effects or random-effects model. Seventeen trials were included and independently assessed for risk of bias. There was low quality evidence that submucosal dexamethasone reduces early postoperative pain, early and late postoperative trismus, and late postoperative oedema after mandibular third molar extraction. Moderate quality evidence was found for the reduction of late postoperative pain and early postoperative oedema. The greatest clinical effect of submucosal dexamethasone injection during impacted mandibular third molar surgery was a reduction of early postoperative pain (number needed to treat (NNT) = 4) and early postoperative oedema (NNT = 5). The reduction in trismus was not clinically significant (<5 mm). Further research focusing on strengthening the quality of evidence, investigating potential harms and a definitive protocol for submucosal administration during mandibular third molar surgery is required.


Assuntos
Dente Impactado , Trismo , Adulto , Dexametasona , Edema , Humanos , Dente Serotino , Dor Pós-Operatória , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Extração Dentária
9.
Periodontol 2000 ; 80(1): 7-11, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31090140

RESUMO

Oral mucosal diseases encompass a diverse array of conditions and disorders arising from malignant, potentially malignant, and nonneoplastic processes. Considerable attention has been paid to the former in recent years, much less to the wide range of nonneoplastic disease processes, which constitute a sizeable proportion of the oral disease burden globally. Many nonneoplastic disease processes of the oral mucosa significantly affect the patient's quality of life. Fortunately, timely identification and intervention can reduce the associated morbidity and, sometimes, mortality. As such, it is of utmost importance that dentists are familiar with early identification and management of this wide range of oral mucosal diseases. This volume of Periodontology 2000 provides a comprehensive contemporary review of such diseases and disorders through 15 chapters. We cover all relevant disease categories: developmental anomalies, infections, white and red lesions, vesiculo-bullous diseases, oral dermatoses, oral ulcerative conditions, dysplastic lesions, and mucosal diseases as manifestations of systemic disease or oral lesions as a part of systemic diseases. Each chapter discusses epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Controversies and many significant gaps in knowledge are exposed, with suggestions for research to address limitations in current understandings. We take a look at the 2017 classification of the periodontal diseases and discuss the importance of close liaison between the specialties of oral medicine and of periodontology in the management of the many oral diseases, apart from the common forms primarily related to oral biofilm, affecting the gingivae and other parts of the periodontium.


Assuntos
Doenças da Boca , Doenças Periodontais , Humanos , Mucosa Bucal , Qualidade de Vida
11.
J Investig Clin Dent ; 9(4): e12343, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863311

RESUMO

The aim of the present systematic review was to determine the malignant transformation rate of actinic cheilitis (AC). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, OvidSP, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria comprised of observational human studies involving the malignant transformation of AC and publications in English. Studies included in this review were clinical follow-up, cohort, retrospective, or prospective investigations. The search yielded 1126 articles, and after exclusion, 34 full-text articles were eligible for full-text analysis. Only one article met the inclusion criteria. Based on the included article, it was determined that the malignant transformation rate of AC to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was 3.07%. Excluded articles focused on the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment efficacies of AC, and no malignant transformation rate was assessed. There is a need for more clinical studies on the malignant transformation of AC, as lip cancer is a public health concern. High-risk populations, including those living in tropical regions, have excessive exposure to UV radiation, and have older aged males, fair-skinned people, and smokers should be identified to prevent AC and its malignant change. Health practitioners should facilitate early intervention to prevent the progression of AC to SCC of the lip.


Assuntos
Transformação Celular Neoplásica/patologia , Queilite/patologia , Neoplasias Labiais/patologia , Humanos , Lábio/patologia , Neoplasias Labiais/etiologia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 25(2): 687-700, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27853930

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To review the literature for outcome measures for oral viral infections in cancer patients. A secondary aim was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral viral infections in cancer patients. METHODS: Databases were searched for articles published in the English language, 1981-2013. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were reviewed systematically. The data about the outcome measures were classified according to the aim of the study: prevention, treatment, or non-interventional. The results of interventional studies were compared to the 2010 MASCC/ISOO publication. RESULTS: Multiple clinical and laboratory tests were used to measure oral viral infections, with great variability between studies. Most of the studies were about Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV). The outcome measure that was most commonly used was the presence of HSV infection diagnosed based on a combination of suggestive clinical presentation with a positive laboratory result. HSV culture was the most commonly reported laboratory outcome measure. Acyclovir and valacyclovir were consistently reported to be efficacious in the management of oral herpetic infections. No new data on the quality of life and economic aspects was found. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the variability in outcome measures reported to assess oral herpetic infections the researcher should select carefully the appropriate measures based on the objective of the study. Acyclovir and valacyclovir are effective in the management of oral herpetic infections in patients receiving treatment for cancer. Studies on newer anti-viral drugs may be useful to address the issue of anti-viral resistance.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Doenças da Boca/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças da Boca/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida
13.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 16(10): 4429-34, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26028109

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Public awareness/knowledge on oral and pharyngeal cancer (OPC), potentially malignant disorders (PMODs) and their risk factors is crucial for prevention and early detection of OPC and PMODs. Yet, there are no published data available on the awareness and knowledge of OPC and PMODs among people living in Far North Queensland, Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted as a cross sectional survey. A self-administered questionnaire was designed and consisted of relevant questions to ascertain socio-demographic information, awareness and knowledge of OPC, PMODs and risk factors and questions on participant's exposure to risk factors and dietary history were also included. Survey was carried out at the Dental Clinic of the James Cook University School of Dentistry (JCU Dental), Cairns, Australia. Subjects above the age of 20 years (n=366) were randomly selected during the period from 31st July to 6th September 2013 and questionnaire was distributed to complete while they are waiting for treatment. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 21 and the chi -squared test was employed to compare groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study revealed that 52.3% of the respondents were aware of the existence of OPC but only 19.0% were aware of PMODs. Of those who were aware of oral cancer, 92% agreed or strongly agreed that smoking is a strong risk factor for OPC. Similarly a relatively high proportion of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that tobacco chewing (84%), tobacco chewing with areca nut (68%), chewing areca nut alone (51%) and exposure to actinic radiation (71%) as risk factors. However, the results for alcohol intake, age, and HPV infection were found to be relatively poor with proportions 33%, 34%, and 23% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed an alarming lack of awareness and knowledge of OPC and PMODs.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Neoplasias Bucais/psicologia , Neoplasias Faríngeas/psicologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Areca/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/etiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Neoplasias Faríngeas/etiologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/etiologia , Queensland , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tabaco sem Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(11): 3223-32, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23900593

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of the following agents for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM): allopurinol, midline mucosa-sparing radiation blocks, payayor, pentoxifylline, timing of radiation therapy (RT) (morning versus late afternoon), pilocarpine, bethanechol, chewing gum, propantheline, and tetrachlorodecaoxide. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, no guideline possible. RESULTS: A total of 32 papers across 10 interventions were examined. New suggestions were developed against the use of systemic pilocarpine administered orally for prevention of OM during RT in head and neck cancer patients and in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation, prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A suggestion was also made against the use of systemic pentoxifylline administered orally for the prevention of OM in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. No guideline was possible for any other agent reviewed due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence. CONCLUSIONS: None of the agents reviewed was determined to be effective for the prevention or treatment of OM. Two agents, pilocarpine and pentoxifylline, were determined to be ineffective, in the populations listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on other interventions.


Assuntos
Alopurinol/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Agonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Protetores contra Radiação/uso terapêutico , Estomatite/tratamento farmacológico , Antimetabólitos/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Goma de Mascar , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estomatite/prevenção & controle
15.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 333, 2013 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23829309

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Considerable global variation in the incidence of lip, of oral cavity and of pharyngeal cancers exists. Whilst this reflects regional or population differences in risk, interpretation is uncertain due to heterogeneity of definitions of sites and of sub-sites within this anatomically diverse region. For Australia, limited data on sub-sites have been published. This study examines age-standardised incidence trends and demography from 1982 to 2008, the latest data available. METHODS: Numbers of cases within ICD10:C00-C14 were obtained from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, recorded by sex, age, and sub-site. Raw data were re-analysed to calculate crude, age-specific and age-standardised incidence using Segi's world-standard population. Time-trends were analysed using Joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Lip, Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal (excluding nasopharynx) cancers, considered together, show a biphasic trend: in men rising 0.9% pa from 1982 to 1992, and declining 1.6% pa between 1992 and 2008. For females: rises of 2.0% pa 1982-1997; declines of 2.8% pa 1997-2008. Lip cancer is declining especially significantly. When the Oropharynx is considered separately, steadily increasing trends of 1.2% pa for men and 0.8% pa for women were observed from 1982 to 2008. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall rates of lip/oral/oropharyngeal cancer are declining in Australia, these are still high. This study revealed steady increases in cancers of the oropharynx, beginning in the late 1990s. Continued efforts to reduce the burden of these cancers are needed, focused on reduction of the traditional risk factors of alcohol and tobacco, and with special emphasis on the possible role of human papillomavirus and sexual hygiene for cancers of the oropharynx.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Labiais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Austrália/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição por Sexo
16.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(11): 3209-21, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23764678

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of natural agents for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, and no guideline possible. RESULTS: A total of 49 papers across 15 interventions were examined. A new suggestion was developed in favor of systemic zinc supplements administered orally in the prevention of oral mucositis in oral cancer patients receiving radiation therapy or chemoradiation (Level III evidence). A recommendation was made against the use of intravenous glutamine for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Level II evidence). No guideline was possible for any other agent, due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Of the various natural agents reviewed here, the available evidence supported a guideline only for two agents: a suggestion in favor of zinc and a recommendation against glutamine, in the treatment settings listed above. Well-designed studies of other natural agents are warranted.


Assuntos
Glutamina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Estomatite/tratamento farmacológico , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , Zinco/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Mel , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Oligoelementos/uso terapêutico
17.
Int Dent J ; 63(1): 12-25, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23410017

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: India has the highest number of cases of oral cancer in the world and this is increasing. This burden is not fully appreciated even within India, despite the high incidence and poor survival associated with this disease. Because the aetiology of oral cancer is predominantly tobacco-related, the immense public health challenge can be ameliorated through habit intervention. METHODS: We reviewed current rates of incidence, mortality and survival, and investigated the determinants of disease and current prevention strategies. RESULTS: In addition to tobacco smoking and the myriad other forms of tobacco use prevalent in India, risk factors include areca nut consumption, alcohol consumption, human papillomavirus, increasing age, male gender and socioeconomic factors. Although India has world-leading cancer treatment centres, access to these is limited. Further, the focus of health care services remains clinical and is either curative or palliative. CONCLUSIONS: Although the efforts of agencies such as the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Indian Dental Association are laudable, enhanced strategies should be based on common risk factors, focusing on primary prevention, health education, early detection and the earliest possible therapeutic intervention. A multi-agency approach is required.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Política Organizacional , Sociedades Odontológicas , Distribuição por Idade , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Areca/efeitos adversos , Coleta de Dados , Inquéritos de Saúde Bucal , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Índia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Bucais/etiologia , Neoplasias Bucais/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Nicotiana/efeitos adversos
19.
Support Care Cancer ; 18(8): 985-92, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20449755

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aims of this systematic review were to determine, in patients receiving cancer therapy, the prevalence of clinical oral fungal infection and fungal colonization, to determine the impact on quality of life and cost of care, and to review current management strategies for oral fungal infections. METHODS: Thirty-nine articles that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were independently reviewed by two calibrated reviewers, each using a standard form. Information was extracted on a number of variables, including study design, study population, sample size, interventions, blinding, outcome measures, methods, results, and conclusions for each article. Areas of discrepancy between the two reviews were resolved by consensus. Studies were weighted as to the quality of the study design, and recommendations were based on the relative strength of each paper. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the weighted prevalence of clinical oral fungal infection and fungal colonization. RESULTS: For all cancer treatments, the weighted prevalence of clinical oral fungal infection was found to be 7.5% pre-treatment, 39.1% during treatment, and 32.6% after the end of cancer therapy. Head and neck radiotherapy and chemotherapy were each independently associated with a significantly increased risk for oral fungal infection. For all cancer treatments, the prevalence of oral colonization with fungal organisms was 48.2% before treatment, 72.2% during treatment, and 70.1% after treatment. The prophylactic use of fluconazole during cancer therapy resulted in a prevalence of clinical fungal infection of 1.9%. No information specific to oral fungal infections was found on quality of life or cost of care. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of clinically significant oral fungal infection during cancer therapy. Systemic antifungals are effective in the prevention of clinical oral fungal infection in patients receiving cancer therapy. Currently available topical antifungal agents are less efficacious, suggesting a need for better topical agents.


Assuntos
Candidíase Bucal/etiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Doenças Faríngeas/etiologia , Antifúngicos/efeitos adversos , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candidíase Bucal/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase Bucal/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Doenças Faríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Faríngeas/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco
20.
J Investig Clin Dent ; 1(2): 156-9, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25427274

RESUMO

This article reports the presentation of oral submucous fibrosis in five Sri Lankan preschool children, aged 2-3 years, with loss of pigmentation of the lips as the sole clinical feature. Oral submucous fibrosis has not been reported in this age group of children. The five 2-3 year olds did not display any classical features of oral submucous fibrosis, due to the disease having been detected at a very early stage. The present study attempts to establish that depigmentation of the lips and oral mucosa is perhaps the earliest feature to develop in the natural history of oral submucous fibrosis. The differential diagnosis of oral mucosal depigmentation relevant to these cases is also discussed. Previously-reported cases of oral submucous fibrosis in children are reviewed.


Assuntos
Hipopigmentação/etiologia , Doenças Labiais/etiologia , Doenças da Boca/etiologia , Fibrose Oral Submucosa/complicações , Areca , Biópsia , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Hipopigmentação/patologia , Masculino , Mucosa Bucal/patologia , Nozes , Sri Lanka
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA