A Cohort Study of the Antitumor Efficacy and Toxicity Profile of Alpelisib for Metastatic or Locally Advanced HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Alpelisib is approved in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) to treat patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) progressive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The SOLAR-1 trial demonstrated the efficacy of this oral agent and showed that, while alpelisib improves outcomes compared to placebo, it is also associated with clinically relevant adverse events (AEs). There is a pressing need for improved knowledge on the effectiveness and tolerability of this agent in real-world patient populations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HR+, HER2- MBC treated with alpelisib and ET. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of alpelisib in a real-world population. Deidentified patient-, tumor-, and outcome-related data, including AEs, were collected and summarized. Kaplan-Meier methods were applied for survival analyses, and stratified analyses of interest were conducted. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 76 women treated with alpelisib + ET were included in our cohort. Most had been previously treated with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and chemotherapy for MBC. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.0). The median overall survival was longer among patients without prior everolimus therapy (hazard ratio, 4.28 [95% CI, 1.64-11.16]; p = 0.0012), and no significant outcome differences were observed between patients treated with different starting doses of alpelisib. Approximately 31.6% of patients permanently discontinued alpelisib due to AEs, and 32.9% had at least one dose reduction. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hyperglycemia (21%), fatigue (13.2%), and diarrhea (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: For progressive HR+, HER2- MBC, alpelisib + ET showed effectiveness in a real-world patient population that was comparable to published clinical trial data, regardless of starting dose. However, the effectiveness of alpelisib following previous everolimus exposure may be limited and, hence, should be a consideration to decide sequencing of therapy in these patients. Patients treated with alpelisib are at risk for clinically relevant AEs and require close monitoring.

Clinical Practices and Institutional Protocols on Prophylaxis, Monitoring, and Management of Selected Adverse Events Associated with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.

The treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has evolved significantly in the past several years with the approval of new targeted agents. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody-drug conjugate with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, is a new addition to the class of therapies that target the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor. T-DXd was approved in the US in December 2019 for patients with HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable breast cancer who have received 2 or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. In the DESTINY-Breast01 phase II trial (NCT03248492), T-DXd demonstrated high rates of durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive mBC, with a confirmed objective response rate of 62%, median duration of response of 18.2 months, and median progression-free survival of 19.4 months. In addition to efficacy, successful implementation of any new anticancer therapy includes learning how to prevent, monitor, and manage treatment-related adverse events. As T-DXd becomes more widely used, information can be gained from real-world clinical practices, institutional approaches, and the collaboration of multidisciplinary oncology teams who treat patients with T-DXd. This article reviews practical insights and management of nausea and vomiting, neutropenia, interstitial lung disease, risk of cardiotoxicity, and other adverse events associated with T-DXd administration from the perspective of health care providers who have experience utilizing T-DXd.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected toxicity endpoints of alpelisib.

PURPOSE: Alpelisib is a first-in-class α-specific phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. High absolute risk (AR) of relevant toxicities has been observed with this treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to improve the precision of the estimated AR of selected adverse events (AEs) associated with this new agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in August 2019 to identify trials analyzing the anti-tumor efficacy and toxicity profile of alpelisib. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I 2 statistics. Data were analyzed using random effect meta-analyses for AR. Eleven trials and 511 patients were included. RESULTS: There was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies regarding the AR of most AEs except for all-grade weight loss and grade 3-4 stomatitis. The number of serious AEs was clearly reported in only one study, of which the most common was hyperglycemia; the most common all-grade AEs were hyperglycemia (59%), diarrhea (56%), nausea (44%), and rash (38%). Grade 3/4 hyperglycemia and rash occurred in 28% and 10% of patients, respectively. No treatment-associated deaths were observed, and 18% of patients had to stop treatment due to toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Alpelisib is associated with clinically relevant AEs that can lead to treatment discontinuation. The most common AE was hyperglycemia. No treatment-related deaths were observed.

Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs.

Biological oncology products are integral to cancer treatment, but their high costs pose challenges to patients, families, providers, and insurers. The introduction of biosimilar agents-molecules that are similar in structure, function, activity, immunogenicity, and safety to the original biological drugs-provide opportunities both to improve health-care access and outcomes, and to reduce costs. Several international regulatory pathways have been developed to expedite entry of biosimilars into global marketplaces. The first wave of oncology biosimilar use was in Europe and India in 2007. Oncology biosimilars are now widely marketed in several countries in Europe, and in Australia, Japan, China, Russia, India, and South Korea. Their use is emerging worldwide, with the notable exception of the USA, where several regulatory and cost barriers to biosimilar approval exist. In this Review, we discuss oncology biosimilars and summarise their regulatory frameworks, clinical experiences, and safety concerns.