Subtypes of familial breast tumours revealed by expression and copy number profiling.

Extensive expression profiling studies have shown that sporadic breast cancer is composed of five clinically relevant molecular subtypes. However, although BRCA1-related tumours are known to be predominantly basal-like, there are few published data on other classes of familial breast tumours. We analysed a cohort of 75 BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 breast tumours by gene expression profiling and found that 74% BRCA1 tumours were basal-like, 73% of BRCA2 tumours were luminal A or B, and 52% non-BRCA1/2 tumours were luminal A. Thirty-four tumours were also analysed by single nucleotide polymorphism-comparative genomic hybridization (SNP-CGH) arrays. Copy number data could predict whether a tumour was basal-like or luminal with high accuracy, but could not predict its mutation class. Basal-like BRCA1 and basal-like non-BRCA1 tumours were very similar, and contained the highest number of chromosome aberrations. We identified regions of frequent gain containing potential driver genes in the basal (8q and 12p) and luminal A tumours (1q and 17q). Regions of homozygous loss associated with decreased expression of potential tumour suppressor genes were also detected, including in basal tumours (5q and 9p), and basal and luminal tumours (10q). This study highlights the heterogeneity of familial tumours and the clinical consequences for treatment and prognosis.

Frequent somatic mutations of GATA3 in non-BRCA1/BRCA2 familial breast tumors, but not in BRCA1-, BRCA2- or sporadic breast tumors.

Heterozygous somatic mutations of the transcription factor, GATA-3, have recently been reported in approximately 5% breast of tumors unselected for family history. We sequenced the GATA-3 gene in 55 breast tumors from women with familial breast cancer, and found seven heterozygous somatic mutations, all in non-BRCA1/2 cases in which the frequency was 22%. In contrast, we found mutations of GATA-3 in only 4% of 81 sporadic tumors analysed. It is possible that GATA3 mutations occur earlier in the evolution of BRCAx tumors, compared to BRCA1, BRCA2 or sporadic tumors, and are therefore easier to detect by direct sequencing in the presence of some stromal contamination.

Mutation of ERBB2 provides a novel alternative mechanism for the ubiquitous activation of RAS-MAPK in ovarian serous low malignant potential tumors.

Approximately, 10% to 15% of serous ovarian tumors fall into the category designated as tumors of low malignant potential (LMP). Like their invasive counterparts, LMP tumors may be associated with extraovarian disease, for example, in the peritoneal cavity and regional lymph nodes. However, unlike typical invasive carcinomas, patients generally have a favorable prognosis. The mutational profile also differs markedly from that seen in most serous carcinomas. Typically, LMP tumors are associated with KRAS and BRAF mutations. Interrogation of expression profiles in serous LMP tumors suggested overall redundancy of RAS-MAPK pathway mutations and a distinct mechanism of oncogenesis compared with high-grade ovarian carcinomas. Our findings indicate that activating mutation of the RAS-MAPK pathway in serous LMP may be present in >70% of cases compared with approximately 12.5% in serous ovarian carcinomas. In addition to mutations of KRAS (18%) and BRAF (48%) mutations, ERBB2 mutations (6%), but not EGFR, are prevalent among serous LMP tumors. Based on the expression profile signature observed throughout our serous LMP cohort, we propose that RAS-MAPK pathway activation is a requirement of serous LMP tumor development and that other activators of this pathway are yet to be defined. Importantly, as few nonsurgical options exist for treatment of recurrent LMP tumors, therapeutic targeting of this pathway may prove beneficial, especially in younger patients where maintaining fertility is important.

BCoR-L1 variation and breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: BRCA1 is involved in numerous essential processes in the cell, and the effects of BRCA1 dysfunction in breast cancer carcinogenesis are well described. Many of the breast cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA2, p53, ATM, CHEK2, and BRIP1 encode proteins that interact with BRCA1. BCL6 corepressor-like 1 (BCoR-L1) is a newly described BRCA1-interacting protein that displays high homology to several proteins known to be involved in the fundamental processes of DNA damage repair and transcription regulation. BCoR-L1 has been shown to play a role in transcription corepression, and expression of the X-linked BCoR-L1 gene has been reported to be dysregulated in breast cancer subjects. BCoR-L1 is located on the X chromosome and is subject to X inactivation. METHODS: We performed mutation analysis of 38 BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer families with male breast cancer, prostate cancer, and/or haplotype sharing around BCoR-L1 to determine whether there is a role for BCoR-L1 as a high-risk breast cancer predisposition gene. In addition, we conducted quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) on lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from the index cases from these families and a number of cancer cell lines to assess the role of BCoR-L1 dysregulation in cancer and cancer families. RESULTS: Very little variation was detected in the coding region, and qRT-PCR analysis revealed that BCoR-L1 expression is highly variable in cancer-free subjects, high-risk breast cancer patients, and cancer cell lines. We also report the investigation of a new expression control, DIDO1 (death inducer-obliterator 1), that is superior to GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and UBC (ubiquitin C) for analysis of expression in LCLs. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BCoR-L1 expression does not play a large role in predisposition to familial breast cancer.

A novel corepressor, BCoR-L1, represses transcription through an interaction with CtBP.

Corepressors play a crucial role in negative gene regulation and are defective in several diseases. BCoR is a corepressor for the BCL6 repressor protein. Here we describe and functionally characterize BCoR-L1, a homolog of BCoR. When tethered to a heterologous promoter, BCoR-L1 is capable of strong repression. Like other corepressors, BCoR-L1 associates with histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Specifically, BCoR-L1 coprecipitates with the Class II HDACs, HDAC4, HDAC5, and HDAC7, suggesting that they are involved in its role as a transcriptional repressor. BCoR-L1 also interacts with the CtBP corepressor through a CtBP-interacting motif in its amino terminus. Abrogation of the CtBP binding site within BCoR-L1 partially relieves BCoR-L1-mediated transcriptional repression. Furthermore, BCoR-L1 is located on the E-cadherin promoter, a known CtBP-regulated promoter, and represses the E-cadherin promoter activity in a reporter assay. The inhibition of BCoR-L1 expression by RNA-mediated interference results in derepression of E-cadherin in cells that do not normally express E-cadherin, indicating that BCoR-L1 contributes to the repression of an authentic endogenous CtBP target.

Mutation and expression analysis of LZTS1 in ovarian cancer.

LZTS1 has been shown to have tumour suppressor activities against prostate and breast cancer and is located within a region of frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 8p22 in ovarian cancer. We have analysed the expression of LZTS1 in ovarian cancer and found no evidence of loss of expression relative to normal ovarian surface epithelial cells. We have also analysed the coding region of the LZTS1 gene in 87 primary ovarian adenocarcinomas by DHPLC and detected a single silent somatic mutation. These data indicate that LZTS1 is not the target of LOH at 8p22 in ovarian cancer.

Transfer of chromosome 8 into two breast cancer cell lines: total exclusion of three regions indicates location of putative in vitro growth suppressor genes.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the short arm of chromosome 8 occurs frequently in breast tumors. Fine mapping of the smallest regions of overlap of the deletions indicates that multiple tumor suppressor genes may be located in this region. We have performed microcell-mediated chromosome transfer of chromosome 8 into two breast cancer cell lines, 21MT-1 and T-47D. Twenty-two of the resulting hybrids were characterized extensively with chromosome 8 microsatellite markers and a subset were assayed for growth in vitro and soft agar clonicity. There was no evidence in any of the hybrids for suppression of growth or clonicity that could be attributed to the presence of particular regions of chromosome 8; however, none of the 22 hybrids examined had taken up all of the donor chromosome 8, and in fact there were three regions that contained only one allele of the markers genotyped in all 22 hybrids. These results are consistent with the presence of suppressor genes on the short arm of chromosome 8 causing strong growth suppression that is incompatible with growth in vitro; that is, multiple suppressor genes may exist on the short arm of chromosome 8.

Chromosome 8 genetic analysis and phenotypic characterization of 21 ovarian cancer cell lines.

The short arm of chromosome 8 undergoes frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in ovarian adenocarcinomas. Fine mapping has identified several distinct critical regions within 8p which undergo rates of LOH of 50% or greater, suggesting that there may be more than one tumor suppressor gene located on this chromosome arm. In an effort to refine the location of these putative tumor suppressor genes by homozygosity-mapping-of-deletion analysis, we have analyzed 21 ovarian cancer cell lines with 19 polymorphic microsatellite markers from 8p. Eleven of the cell lines (55%) were homozygous at every marker, indicating loss of an entire 8p arm. No smaller extended regions of hemizygosity were identified. Refinement of these 8p target regions was therefore not possible, but this analysis did identify the ovarian cancer cell lines that would be most appropriate for microcell-mediated chromosome transfer to complement the hypothesized mutation in the target tumor suppressor gene(s) on 8p. The 11 cell lines that had undergone 8p LOH were therefore characterized for colony formation in soft agar and tumor formation in nude mice. We identified four cell lines (JAM, OVCA4, OVCA5, and OVCA8) that were hemizygous for 8p and that formed colonies in soft agar and tumors in nude mice, making them ideal cell lines for chromosome 8 or candidate gene transfer.