Implication of biosignatures in the progression of endometriosis.

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic inflammatory disorder involving the placement and growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is the most common multifactorial disease that affects the life quality of women in reproductive age. Due to its multicomponent nature, early diagnosis of the disease is challenging. Since many genetic, epigenetic alterations and non-genetic factors contribute to the pathology of endometriosis, devising a drug therapy that directly acts on the ectopic tissue is extremely difficult. Endometriosis is a hormone-driven disease with estrogen considered as a primary driver for the development of endometriotic lesions. This study aims to identify biosignatures involved in endometriosis with and without gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa). GnRHa is a short peptide analog of GnRH that causes inhibition of estrogen and androgen synthesis. Microarray based-gene expression profiling was performed on total RNA extracted from endometriotic tissue samples with and without GnRHa-treated patients already published in our previous paper. The untreated group were considered as the control. Genes were then selected for validation by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR analysis confirmed significant downregulation in(p < 0.05) expression of DARC (p = 0.0042), CDH1 (p = 0.0027), CDH5 (p = 0.0283), ATP2A3 (p < 0.001), RGS5 (p = 0.0032), and CD36 (p = 0.0162) in endometriosis patients treated with GnRHa analogs. Although, CTNNAL1 (p = 0.0136) also showed significant results but there was upregulation in their expression levels after GnRHa treatment. Thus, an altered expression of these genes makes them a possible candidate determinant of endometriosis treated with GnRHa.

Role of mineral nutrients other than iron in pregnancy: under recognized opportunities to improve maternal/fetal outcomes: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Anemia during pregnancy is an important global health concern, affecting 40% of women worldwide, and iron deficiency shares a significant proportion of the burden. From conception to birth, pregnancy is a period when women undergo metabolic and physiological changes. The nutritional needs are higher during pregnancy; thus, adequate nutrition is essential to maintain fetal growth and development. However, adverse effects due to deficiency in nutrition during pregnancy can result in maternal, fetal and neonatal complications. Despite the multifactorial etiology of anemia, iron deficiency is assumed as the primary cause of anemia during pregnancy and hence, mitigation strategy pivots around it for anemia management. Therefore, excluding other contributors, a single-micronutrient approach with iron supplements remains a myopic approach and this can exacerbate iron deficiency anemia. Micronutrient deficiencies are of particular concern as they may pose a silent threat to the survival and well-being of reproductive-age women and their infants. AIM: Micronutrients, especially trace minerals, play a myriad of roles in pregnancy, and the lack of each one causes adverse complications to both the mother and the fetus. In this review paper, we attempt to piece together available information regarding the adverse effects of abnormal trace mineral levels along with iron deficiency on the mother and the fetus. METHOD: A non-systematic literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane databases, for publications on minerals and vitamins during pregnancy and the possible influence of supplements on pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: Micronutrient deficiency exacerbates the pregnancy-induced anemia and other adverse birth outcomes. Micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy can combat anemia as well as reduce a number of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a comprehensive manner.

Assessment of MMP14, CAV2, CLU and SPARCL1 expression profiles in endometriosis.

Endometriotic cells exhibit a notable degree of invasiveness and some characteristics of tissue remodeling underlying lesion formation. In this regard, do matrix metalloproteinases 14 (MMP14) and other related genes such as SPARC-like protein 1 (SPARCL1), caveolin 2 (CAV2), and clusterin (CLU) exert any significant influence in the processes of endometriosis development and pathophysiology is not apparent. We aim to assess whether these genes could serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers in endometriosis. Microarray-based gene expression analysis was performed on total RNA extracted from endometriotic tissue samples treated with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). The GnRHa untreated patients were considered the control group. The validation of genes was performed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR analysis showed significant downregulation in the expression of MMP14 (p = 0.024), CAV2 (p = 0.017), and upregulation of CLU (p = 0.005) in endometriosis patients treated with GnRHa. SPARCL1 did not show any significant (p = 0.30) change in the expression compared to the control group. These data have the potential to contribute to the comprehension of the molecular pathways implicated in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix, which is a vital step for the physiology of the endometrium. Based on the result, it is concluded that changes in the expression of MMP14, CAV2, and CLU post-treatment imply their role in the pathophysiology of endometriosis and may serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker of endometriosis in response to GnRHa treatment in patients with ovarian endometrioma.