Predictors of technical difficulty for trainees in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically challenging, especially for trainees, and requires a safe training system. This study aimed to identify predictors of technical difficulty facing trainees performing esophageal ESD to establish such system. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent ESD performed by trainees between January 2010 and August 2022. Technical difficulties were defined as muscularis propria exposure and long procedure time (≥ 90 min). Factors associated with these technical difficulties were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 798 lesions in 721 patients were evaluated. Muscularis propria exposure occurred in 298 lesions (37.3%), including 10 perforations (1.3%). The procedure time was ≥ 90 min in 134 lesions (16.8%). In the multivariate analysis, tumor size ≥ 20 mm, tumors ≥ 1/2 of the circumference, and those close to previous treatment scars significantly increased the incidence of both difficulties, whereas tumors in the upper esophagus significantly decreased this incidence. Furthermore, female sex and tumors in the left wall were independent predictors of muscularis propria exposure, and elevated morphology was an independent predictor of long procedure time. Muscularis propria exposure and long procedure time occurred in more than half of the cases with three or more predictors of each difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Large tumors and tumors close to previous treatment scars increase technical difficulties for trainees in esophageal ESD. Conversely, tumors in the upper esophagus reduce these difficulties. These results enable us to predict the difficulty level preoperatively and select appropriate cases in stepwise training.

Potential role of a novel endoscopic retrieval bag for large colorectal resected specimen: a proof-of-concept study.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection enables en bloc resection of large superficial colorectal neoplasms. However, it is sometimes challenging to retrieve a large resected specimen via the anus without sample fragmentation. A novel "bag-type" retrieval device has been developed to accomplish complete isolation and non-destructive delivery of oversized specimens. This single-center retrospective study was performed to demonstrate the efficacy of this device for large colorectal resected specimens. Among 17 patients, we identified 18 superficial colorectal lesions for which the use of a novel retrieval device (Endo Carry Large Type) was indicated at specimen delivery at a referral cancer institute from March 2021 to July 2022. The median (interquartile range) tumor size was 62.5 (52.0-79.5) mm. Retrieval of 17 (94%) of 18 resected specimens was performed using the Endo Carry Large Type, and 16 (89%) were successfully retrieved without sample fragmentation. The median (interquartile range) retrieval time was 4 (4-8) minutes, and no apparent adverse events were observed. The novel Endo Carry Large Type device can accomplish colorectal specimen retrieval safely and quickly without specimen damage and therefore may contribute to accurate pathological diagnosis.

[A case of rectovaginal metastasis 6 years after initial resection of extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of vulvar origin].

A 53-year-old woman who had undergone excision of KIT-positive extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) of the vulva 6 years ago presented to our hospital due to a positive fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy revealed a submucosal tumor in the rectum ventral side. In addition, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor in the rectovaginal septum. For diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, the tumor was resected via the perineal approach. The resected specimen analysis revealed a KIT-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Following immunopathological and genetic mutation identifications, GIST of the rectovaginal septum from vulva EGIST metastasis was diagnosed. It is important to consider primary GIST and metastatic GIST as differential diagnoses in the case of a rectal submucosal tumor detected by endoscopy.