Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Thorac Surg Clin ; 32(3): 383-395, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35961746

RESUMO

Lung cancer is an increasing problem in the developing world due to rising trends in smoking, high incidence of air pollution, lack of awareness and screening, delayed presentation, and diagnosis at the advanced stage. Even after diagnosis, there are disparities in access to health care facilities and inequitable distribution of resources and treatment options. In addition, the shortage of trained personnel and infrastructure adds to the challenges faced by patients with lung cancer in these regions. A multi-pronged effort targeting tobacco cessation, health promotion and awareness, capacity building, and value-based care are the need of the hour.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Programas de Rastreamento , Fumar
2.
Nat Cancer ; 3(5): 547-551, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379984

RESUMO

Patients with cancer are at higher risk for adverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. Here, we studied 1,253 patients with cancer, who were diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at a tertiary referral cancer center in India. Most patients had mild disease; in our settings, recent cancer therapies did not impact COVID-19 outcomes. Advancing age, smoking history, concurrent comorbidities and palliative intent of treatment were independently associated with severe COVID-19 or death. Thus, our study provides useful insights into cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
3.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 1093-1100, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34228486

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The 2018 WHO health workforce report analyzing gender equity in 104 countries reported that although women constituted 70% of the workers, they were less likely to be employed full-time and faced a 28% gender pay gap. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has affected professional as well as personal lives of physicians. We conducted a survey among Indian physicians to understand this impact. METHODS: A 31-point anonymized survey to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdown on physicians' domestic responsibilities was disseminated via e-mail and text messaging applications. Our aim was to evaluate whether the impact was gender-based and to look for differences in aspects of domestic work, childcare, and professional commitments. RESULTS: We obtained 1,041 responses, of which 643 identified themselves as men and 393 as women. An increase in the domestic responsibilities during the lockdown was confirmed by 90% of the women compared with 82% men. More women than men were solely responsible for domestic chores (38.7% v 23.7%), managed their children's education (74% v 31%), and felt an adverse impact of the pandemic on their professional work (60.8% v 42.6%). Fewer women's spouses (57/359) than men's (174/594, P = .00001) were forced to take leave or work reduced hours, and double the proportion of women (3.5% v 1.5%) had to quit their jobs to manage responsibilities at home. CONCLUSION: As the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown measures threw newer challenges, more women physicians than men (81% v 63%) shouldered the burden of increased domestic work and childcare. This survey highlights the need to re-examine the specific challenges faced by women physicians and identify means to support and empower them.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Médicos , Criança , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Surg Today ; 50(4): 323-334, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048046

RESUMO

Esophageal cancer surgery, comprising esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy, is a complex procedure associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol which aims to improve perioperative care, minimize complications, and accelerate recovery is showing promise for achieving better perioperative outcomes. ERAS is a multimodal approach that has been reported to shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce surgical stress response, decrease morbidity, and expedite recovery. While ERAS components straddle preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods, they need to be seen in continuum and not as isolated elements. In this review, we elaborate on the components of an ERAS protocol after esophagectomy including preoperative nutrition, prehabilitation, counselling, smoking and alcohol cessation, cardiopulmonary evaluation, surgical technique, anaesthetic management, intra- and postoperative fluid management and pain relief, mobilization and physiotherapy, enteral and oral feeding, removal of drains, and several other components. We also share our own institutional protocol for ERAS following esophageal resections.


Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/reabilitação , Esofagectomia/métodos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória
6.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg ; 3(6): 592-597, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31788647

RESUMO

Esophageal cancer incidence is growing worldwide, especially adenocarcinomas in the western world. Outcomes overall are universally poor, with the best survival seen in earlier stages of the disease, where surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Although squamous cell cancers and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus have different etiology, clinical features, biological behavior and prognosis, earlier research studies have frequently combined the two histologies. Several trials in the past three decades have been carried out in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and perioperative settings in attempts to improve survival further. Most of the initial studies were small and underpowered, and showed no benefit with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment over surgery alone. More recent well-designed trials have now established that the neoadjuvant (in squamous and adenocarcinomas) and the perioperative (in adenocarcinomas) strategies result in superior outcomes compared to surgery alone. However, the optimum neoadjuvant strategy has still not been identified, with both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (both followed by surgery) showing superior outcomes over surgery alone. Direct comparisons of these two neoadjuvant protocols have not shown a clear benefit of one over the other, although more trials are ongoing and may settle this debate. Future studies using personalized medicine and immunotherapy are required to evaluate their role in the management of esophageal cancers.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA