RESUMO
PURPOSE: Angiogenesis is a crucial phenomenon in the development and progression of breast cancer (BC), but the clinical significance of angiogenesis-related proteins in metastatic BC remains unknown. This study investigates the prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, 3 (VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3) as well as vascular endothelial growth factors A and C (VEGFA and VEGFC) in metastatic BC patients treated with trastuzumab-based regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred female patients were included. Protein and mRNA expression of the studied angiogenesis-related factors were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. RESULTS: High expression of VEGFA, VEGFC, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3 in the tumor cells was observed in 43.5%, 24.2%, 36%, 29.5%, and 43%, respectively. Stromal elements expressed high levels of VEGFA, VEGFC, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3 in 78.9%, 93.3%, 90.7%, 90.2%, and 74.8% of tumors with available data. High tumor cell expression of VEGFR1 was a favorable prognosticator for survival among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; p=0.013). A trend towards longer progression-free survival was detected univariately for patients with HER2-negative tumors and high expression of VEGFR2 (HR, 0.60; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 seem to have significant prognostic value in BC patients with metastatic disease treated with trastuzumab-based regimens.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Neovascularização Patológica/genética , Neovascularização Patológica/metabolismo , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Trastuzumab/uso terapêutico , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The genomic status of non-malignant tissues from carriers of pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) variants may reveal information towards individualized prophylaxis. We performed spatiotemporal tissue genotype comparisons in a real-life cohort of gBRCA1/2 carriers of Greek origin, who underwent multiple risk-reducing/prophylactic surgeries at various time points. METHODS: Fifty-three women (median age 36 years) within cancer families were observed for up to 37.5 years; 43 were cancer carriers and 10 were healthy carriers. Histology review and genotyping were performed for 187 paraffin tissues (average: 3.5 per carrier) including 46 carcinomas (40 breast) and 141 non-malignant breast and gynecological samples. RESULTS: High allelic imbalance (AI) and somatic pathogenic TP53 variants were present in cancer carriers only (p values < 0.0001). High AI was associated with gBRCA1/2 indels (p < 0.0001) and gBRCA2 alterations (p = 0.0109). Somatic (pathogenic) variants were infrequently shared between non-malignant tissues and matched carcinomas. Aberrations of gBRCA1 variant heterozygosity were noticed in tissues from cancer carriers only (13/43, 30.2%). These pertained to classic LOH (neoplastic lesions in 9/43 carriers, 20.9%) and under-representation of the germline variants (5 samples, 4 non-malignant, all in the breast). Both aberrations coexisted in matched samples in one case. Over time, germline variant heterozygosity prevailed in non-malignant tissues; intra-carrier genomic alterations were aggravated (21.1%), ameliorated (26.3%) or remained stable. CONCLUSION: This real-life case study supports the need to address tissue genotypes from prophylactic surgeries in combination with polygenic scores towards personalized prophylaxis. To this end, knowing the traditionally classified pathogenic potential of a gBRCA1/2 variant may not be enough.