Septic hip abscess due to Fusobacterium nucleatum and Actinomyces turicensis in an immunocompetent SARS-CoV-2 positive patient.

A 42-year-old man was referred to the Department of Orthopedic Surgery with pain over his right greater trochanter and signs of systemic infection. CT showed an enhanced mass in his gluteus maximus as well as gas in the biceps femoris over the underlying hip joint. Tissue biopsy yielded Fusobacterium nucleatum and Actinomyces turicensis. The patient was successfully treated for 6 weeks with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875mg/125mg and metronidazole 500mg.

Surgical site infections: guidance for elective surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic - international recommendations and clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic not only had an impact on public life and healthcare facilities in general, but also affected established surgical workflows for elective procedures. The strategy to protect patients and healthcare workers from infection by SARS-CoV-2 in surgical departments has needed step-by-step development. Based on the evaluation of international recommendations and guidelines, as well as personal experiences in a clinical 'hot spot' and in a 450-bed surgical clinic, an adapted surgical site infection (SSI) prevention checklist was needed to develop concise instructions, which described roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals that could be used for wider guidance in pandemic conditions. METHOD: Publications of COVID-19-related recommendations and guidelines, produced by health authorities and organizations, such as WHO, US-CDC, ECDC, the American College of Surgery and the Robert Koch Institute, were retrieved, assessed and referenced up to 31st January 2020. Additionally, clinical personal experiences in Germany were evaluated and considered. RESULTS: Part 1 of this guidance summarizes the experience of a tertiary care, surgical centre which utilized redundant hospital buildings for immediate spatial separation in a 'hot spot' COVID-19 area. Part 2 outlines the successful screening and isolation strategy in a surgical clinic in a region of Germany with outbreaks in surrounding medical centres. Part 3 provides the synopsis of personal experiences and international recommendations suggested for implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Understanding of COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2-related epidemiology, is constantly and rapidly changing, requiring continuous adaptation and re-evaluation of recommendations. Established national and local guidelines for continuation of surgical services and prevention of SSI require ongoing scrutiny and focused implementation. This manuscript presents a core facility checklist to support medical institutions to continue their clinical and surgical work during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A survey on current knowledge, practice and beliefs related to preoperative antimicrobial decolonization regimens for prevention of surgical site infections among Austrian surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Various measures are considered to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI), including preoperative decolonization. Details of preoperative decolonization practices in surgical departments have not been investigated in Austria. AIM: To analyse the current situation of pre-surgical patient decolonization in national hospitals and to assess the current knowledge on this procedure among surgeons of different surgical disciplines. METHODS: A 12-point structured questionnaire was distributed to all Austrian hospitals with at least one surgical department. FINDINGS: Two-thirds (103/158; 65%) of responding surgeons stated that any type of preoperative decolonization is implemented in their surgical department. There was heterogeneity of different protocols, ranging from decolonization of only known S. aureus carriers, of a subgroup of patients, or universal decolonization of all patients before elective surgery. Octenidine was the most frequently used antimicrobial compound (60.2%), followed by mupirocin (38.8%), triclosan (14.6%), polyhexanide (12.6%), chlorhexidine (11.7%), and didecyldimonium chloride (7.8%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative decolonization seems to be performed in Austrian hospitals on a routine basis. However, this measure is implemented using a variety of modalities, antimicrobial compounds, and staff. Since our survey also demonstrated that those who are better informed about preoperative decolonization are also those who are more convinced of the usefulness of the preventive measure, future activities should not only focus on generating more comparable studies in this field, but should also include targeted education.

Comparison of chlorhexidine-isopropanol with isopropanol skin antisepsis for prevention of surgical-site infection after abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) has received increasing attention. Clinical trials have focused on the role of skin antisepsis in preventing SSI. The benefit of combining antiseptic chlorhexidine with alcohol has not been compared with alcohol-based skin preparation alone in a prospective controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Between August and October 2014, patients undergoing abdominal surgery received preoperative skin antisepsis with 70 per cent isopropanol (PA). Those treated between November 2014 and January 2015 received 2 per cent chlorhexidine with 70 per cent isopropanol (CA). The primary endpoint was SSI on postoperative day (POD) 10, which was evaluated using univariable analysis, and a multivariable logistic regression model correcting for known independent risk factors for SSI. The study protocol was published in the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS00011174). RESULTS: In total, 500 patients undergoing elective midline laparotomy were included (CA 221, PA 279). The incidence of superficial and deep SSIs was significantly different on POD 10: 14 of 212 (6·6 per cent) among those treated with CA and 32 of 260 (12·3 per cent) in those who received PA (P = 0·038). In the multivariable analysis, skin antisepsis with CA was an independent factor for reduced incidence of SSI on POD 10 (P = 0·034). CONCLUSION: This study showed a benefit of adding chlorhexidine to alcohol for skin antisepsis in reducing early SSI compared with alcohol alone.

The role of antimicrobial sutures in preventing surgical site infection.

INTRODUCTION Healthcare associated infections (HCAIs) are falling following widespread and enforced introduction of guidelines, particularly those that have addressed antibiotic resistant pathogens such as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus or emergent pathogens such as Clostridium difficile, but no such decline has been seen in the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), either in the UK, the EU or the US. SSI is one of the HCAIs, which are all avoidable complications of a surgical patient's pathway through both nosocomial and community care. METHODS This report is based on a meeting held at The Royal College of Surgeons of England on 21 July 2016. Using PubMed, members of the panel reviewed the current use of antiseptics and antimicrobial sutures in their specialties to prevent SSI. FINDINGS The group agreed that wider use of antiseptics in surgical practice may help in reducing reliance on antibiotics in infection prevention and control, especially in the perioperative period of open elective colorectal, hepatobiliary and cardiac operative procedures. The wider use of antiseptics includes preoperative showering, promotion of hand hygiene, (including the appropriate use of surgical gloves), preoperative skin preparation (including management of hair removal), antimicrobial sutures and the management of dehisced surgical wounds after infection. The meeting placed emphasis on the level I evidence that supports the use of antimicrobial sutures, particularly in surgical procedures after which the SSI rate is high (colorectal and hepatobiliary surgery) or when a SSI can be life threatening even when the rate of SSI is low (cardiac surgery).

Measurements of chlorhexidine, p-chloroaniline, and p-chloronitrobenzene in saliva after mouth wash before and after operation with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate in maxillofacial surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Chlorhexidine gluconate is used to prevent the accumulation of dental plaque and gingivitis, infection of the surgical site, and ventilator-associated pneumonia in maxillofacial surgery, but it is not clear whether the metabolites of chlorhexidine are detectable in the patient's saliva at clinically relevant concentrations. Forty-three patients who had orofacial operations were randomised to use a 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (n=23), or an octenidine-based, chlorhexidine-free (n=20), mouthwash once preoperatively and three times daily for five postoperative days. After the first, 8.7 (23.3) mg/L chlorhexidine (0.7%-2.5% of the total amount used) was measured in saliva. The concentration increased to 15.2 (6.2) mg/L after the second rinse (first postoperative day), and peaked at 29.4 (11.2) mg/L on the fourth postoperative day. It remained detectable for up to 12hours after the last one, but was not detectable in serum or urine at any time. The potentially carcinogenic metabolite p-chloroaniline was detectable in saliva at higher concentrations in the chlorhexidine group (0.55mg/L) than the octenidine group (0.21mg/L), and p-chloronitrobenzene was detected in both groups in only minimal concentrations (0.001-0.21mg/L). Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwashes do increase the concentration of p-chloroaniline, but a single use seems to be safe. Whether prolonged exposure over many years may have carcinogenic potential is still not clear. Based on the hitherto unknown kinetics of p-chloroaniline in saliva, the recent recommendation of the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA to limit the use of a chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash to a maximum of six months seems to be justified.

Antimicrobial efficacy of preoperative skin antisepsis and clonal relationship to postantiseptic skin-and-wound flora in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery.

Nosocomial surgical site infections (SSI) are still important complications in surgery. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to elucidate the possible role of skin flora surviving preoperative antisepsis as a possible cause of SSI. We conducted a two-phase prospective clinical trial in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery at a university trauma center in northern Germany. Quantitative swab samples were taken from pre- and postantiseptic skin and, additionally, from the wound base, wound margin, and the suture of 137 patients. Seventy-four patients during phase I and 63 during phase II were investigated. Microbial growth, species spectrum, and antibiotic susceptibility were analyzed. In phase two, the clonal relationship of strains was additionally analyzed. 18.0 % of the swab samples were positive for bacterial growth in the wound base, 24.5 % in the margin, and 27.3 % in the suture. Only 65.5 % of patients showed a 100 % reduction of the skin flora after antisepsis. The microbial spectrum in all postantiseptic samples was dominated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Clonally related staphylococci were detected in ten patients [nine CoNS, one methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)]. Six of ten patients were suspected of having transmitted identical clones from skin flora into the wound. Ethanol-based antisepsis results in unexpected high levels of skin flora, which can be transmitted into the wound during surgery causing yet unexplained SSI. Keeping with the concept of zero tolerance, further studies are needed in order to understand the origin of this flora to allow further reduction of SSI.

[Aortofemoral vascular graft infections and their prevention]. / Protheseninfektionen im aortofemoralen Bereich und ihre Vermeidung.

Vascular prosthesis infections are potentially severe adverse events following vascular reconstruction. They are often associated with a high morbidity and mortality, especially in the aortofemoral region. The present article outlines the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of vascular graft infections in a clinical setting. The clinical presentation, inflammatory markers, microbiological work-up and imaging studies can contribute to diagnosing a prosthesis infection. Regarding the bacterial spectrum involved in the etiology of prosthesis infections, single organism infections (monoinfections) have become less significant over the past years, whereas infections with multiple organisms now constitute the most abundant microbiological constellation. Also, infections with resistant bacterial strains have been increasing in number over the past years and deserve special consideration. It remains unclear whether both aspects are due to a true epidemiological change or are the result of advanced molecular microbiological diagnostic methods. While during the past decades perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was regarded as the most important measure for preventing prosthesis infections in vascular surgery, other primary preventive hygiene strategies have been increasingly explored and grouped together in the sense of preventive bundles. In most cases of deep postoperative infections involving a prosthetic device in the aortofemoral region, explantation of the prosthesis will be required. In situ and extra-anatomical reconstructions are often performed in such cases and the decision process to develop an optimal treatment plan must consider several individual factors. In select patients, palliative preservation of the prosthesis despite surrounding infection (i.e. graft salvage) and best conservative management in combination with local surgical measures, such as incision and drainage and vacuum therapy, deserve consideration as a treatment option for patients with a high surgical risk.

Clinical use of the antiseptic polihexanide for genital tract infections.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, treatment of genital tract infections is based on administration of either antibiotics or antiseptics. While antibiotics may be applied systemically or topically, antiseptics may be applied only topically. In case of bacterial vaginosis (BV), antibiotic therapy may often be limited and side effects due to systemic administration may develop. Polihexanide (PHMB) is a promising option for the topical treatment of genital tract infections, in particular BV and vaginitis. METHOD: A systematic search for publications on the use of PHMB for the treatment of genital infections in two electronic databases was performed. Titles, abstracts and citations were imported into a reference database. Duplicates were removed and two reviewers assessed each identified publication separately. RESULTS: Among a total of 204 references, 3 prospective randomized trials were identified. Two trials treated BV infections with PHMB in comparison to clindamycin as antibiotic standard therapy with no significant differences either in safety or in efficacy. The third controlled trial investigated the clinical efficacy of PHMB compared to placebo in the treatment of human papilloma virus. Patients treated with PHMB daily for up to 16-weeks showed significantly higher (52%) clearance of genital warts as compared to patients treated with placebo (4%). CONCLUSION: PHMB may be a clinically effective alternative for the treatment of BV and human papilloma virus. Although PHMB-based antiseptics are available since the late 90s, controlled trials to investigate its clinical potential for antiseptic treatment are scant. Clinical use of antiseptics for the treatment of infectious diseases should be explored and supported further.

Recommendations for reporting treatment of aortic graft infections.

The purpose of these recommendations is to provide a standard format for reporting treatment results and standardised epidemiologic data after aortic vascular graft infection to improve the comparison of clinical outcomes between different therapeutic approaches and different study populations. Analytical reporting standards for patients' characteristics, type and extent of the disease, type of treatment and study design are described. Adherence to these recommendations will improve clinical relevance, quality and comparability of future studies dealing with aortic vascular graft infections.

Economic burden of inappropriate antibiotic use for prophylactic purpose in shiraz, iran.

BACKGROUND: Because economic data on the prophylactic usage of antibiotic in Iran are scant, we have conducted a cross-sectional study with provider perspective to measure costs and appropriate use of antibiotics in surgical wards of 6 training hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Iran. METHODS: Over a six-month period 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing surgical operation were enrolled and information on prophylactic antibiotic administration was collected. The information included basic patient's demographic data, types of surgery, category of antibiotic, dosage, dosage intervals, route of administration, number of doses, initiation times and duration of administration. In order to determine the agreement between prescribed antibiotics and medical indication, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Nine hundred and ninety three out of 1,000 patients (99.3%) had received at least one antibiotic and 908 patients (91.4 %) received antibiotics because of a medical indication. Five out of 913 patients who had indications for antibiotic prophylaxis did not receive any antibiotic. Antibiotics were prescribed for 85 out of 87 (98%) procedures in which an antibiotic was not indicated. The average cost of antibiotic prescription per surgical procedure was 786,936 Iranian Rials (corresponding to 99.60 USD or €82.90). The most frequent prescribed antibiotic was cefazoline adding 53.3% of the total cost of antibiotics. In total, 36,516,190 Iranian Rials (corresponding to 4,622.95 USD or €3,845.20) were spent for cefazoline alone. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that all surgical patients received at least one antibiotic as prophylaxis for any infection in the surgical site. Our results indicate over- and misuse of antibiotics in Iran leading to a great amount of economic burden, since in 98% of all procedures, antibiotics were used inappropriately.

[What is the appropriate time-interval for changing gloves during surgical procedures]. / Wann sollte in Operationsräumen ein Wechsel chirurgischer Handschuhe erfolgen?

BACKGROUND: Surgical gloves are an important phys-ical barrier between surgical staff and the pa-tient. They enable prevention of transmission of microorganisms in both directions, from the sur-geons' hands to the patient and vice versa. Besides the duration of wearing and the role within the surgical team, the integrity of gloves depends on the type of surgery performed. Therefore indicator systems and specific material enforcements of gloves at predilection sites are under discussion and furthermore, recommendations have been made for double-gloving during trauma surgical procedures. Because of varying recommendations regarding the changing interval of gloves, changes are often performed rather late or even not at all. The consequence is an increasing rate of glove perforations and an incalculable risk of infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To elaborate an objective recommendation for the time-interval of glove change, the medical literature was searched in the data bases MEDLINE and PubMed. RESULTS: Various imprecise recommendations were expressed for the time point of glove changing rang-ing from 30 min to 180 min. Only in visceral surgery perforation rates had been correlated with the glove wearing time and the following recommendations of glove changing time points had been made: for the surgeon and first assistant at 90 min and for scrub nurses and second assistants at 150 min from the start of the operation. CONCLUSION: Because the perforation rate and thus the time for glove changing depend on the type of the surgery, the results found in visceral surgery can not be transferred to other surgical special-ties without additional scientific evidence. Further studies are needed that correlate the types of surgical procedures with specific perforation rates in order to provide basis for solid -recommendations helping to improve patients' and medical staff's safety.

Hemodialysis access surgery--is there an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus compared to other elective vascular interventions?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether dedicated access surgeons might have a significantly higher risk of acquiring hepatitis C infection compared to other vascular surgeons by assessing the prevalence of hepatitis C patients who are on chronic hemodialysis and to compare the frequency to patients undergoing elective vascular interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart and data analysis of all patients on chronic hemodialysis was conducted. As a comparative group, the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies and positive HCV RNA PCR among patients admitted for elective vascular surgery was assessed. RESULTS: Of 285 patients on chronic hemodialysis, 202 (71%) were had both tests (antibody test for HCV and specific HCV RNA PCR testing). 5% (n = 11; CI 95 = 3-10%) were antibody positive, and 4% (n = 8; CI 95 = 2-8%) were also PCR positive and therefore infectious. One patient was acutely infected. Of 4963 vascular surgical patients, 1141 (23%) had an anti-HCV antibody ELISA test and specific HCV RNA PCR testing. 0.4% (n = 4; CI 95 = 0.1-1%) were antibody positive and 0.2% (n = 2; CI 95 = 0.03-0.7%) were also PCR positive and hence infectious. No acutely infected patient was detected in this population. The chance of operating on a HCV positive and infectious patient among hemodialysis patients was almost 27 times higher than among elective vascular surgical patients (P < 0.0001; OR = 26.56; CI 95 = 5.42-253.40). CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated hemodialysis access surgeons have a higher risk to acquire hepatitis C infection compared to vascular surgeons performing all other elective vascular surgical interventions. To identify early infected surgeons operating on high risk HCV patient collectives and to start rapid treatment, PCR testing at regular intervals would be advisable.

Fusion of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical and functional evaluation of two surgical techniques.

We retrospectively compared wrist arthrodesis using the Mannerfelt technique in 19 or an AO-plate in 23 patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. The mean follow-up was for 76 months. Compared with the Mannerfelt fusion group, patients in the AO-plate group reported greater satisfaction with their wrist function (74% vs 37%, p = 0.015). Complications were reported in six wrists in the AO-plate group and two wrists in the Mannerfelt fusion group (p = 0.258). At final follow-up, 95% of patients (41) reported either no pain or only mild pain. There was improvement in flexion of the finger joints in both groups but no significant improvement in the extension lag in either group. Both methods relieve pain and improve function. Overall, the activities of daily living scores and the patients' subjective assessment of outcome tended to be higher in the AO-plate group than in the Mannerfelt fusion group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, although more postoperative complications occurred in the AO-plate group, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Feasibility and clinical applicability of polihexanide for treatment of second-degree burn wounds.

OBJECTIVES: Due to a partial rejection of mesh split-thickness skin grafts (mesh grafts) after application of povidone-iodine and silver nitrate and due to its better in vitro tolerance, polihexanide was investigated as an alternative and its applicability in the treatment of second-degree burn wounds. METHODS: In 4 patients with poorly healing decubitus ulcers the mesh grafts were each divided into three areas which were pre-treated with either undiluted povidone-iodine solution, 1% silver nitrate solution or 0.04% polihexanide solution. After 7 days of application the wound areas were compared clinically and histologically. Thereafter 14 patients (average extent of burns 28% TBSA) were treated in the same way. RESULTS: Clinically and histologically the mesh grafts treated with polihexanide showed by far the best re-epithelialization compared with the deep tissue necrosis and marked fibrin discharge observed for application of povidone-iodine and silver nitrate. The second-degree burn wounds treated with polihexanide epithelialized without any further débridement after an average of 10 days with remarkable freedom from pain. Compared with silver nitrate treatment, no fibrin film was observed on the wound. CONCLUSION: Polihexanide proved clinically and histologically superior to povidone-iodine and silver nitrate. For the treatment of second-degree burns, which cannot primarily be covered by plastic surgery, polihexanide is suitable because in addition to its antiseptic efficacy it does not inhibit the re-epithelialization process.

Metastatic bone disease: a 36-year single centre trend-analysis of patients admitted to a tertiary orthopaedic surgical department.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The treatment and outcome of primary malignant bone tumours has changed with the advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities. A trend-analysis on a large cohort of patients with metastatic bone disease was performed. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all cases with metastatic bone disease admitted to a single tertiary orthopaedic referral centre, registered with the Vienna Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry between 1968 and 2003 was conducted. For trend-analysis of frequency, survival, primary site, treatment methods, and others, the 36-year study duration was divided into four periods. RESULTS: The study identified 601 females and 580 males (mean: 60 years) with metastatic bone disease. The most common metastases were secondary to breast cancer (n = 275; 23%) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 242; 21%) and the majority were located in the femur (n = 332; 28%) and spine (n = 348; 29%). Overall, the proportion of patients who underwent surgery decreased. At follow-up, 887 (75%) patients were verified to have died of their disease. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 36-year period, the frequency of bone metastases has increased at our centre. Although survival increased over time, the difference was not significant; this was most likely attributable to the seriousness of cases referred to our tertiary care centre.

Homocysteine and early re-stenosis after carotid eversion endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Homocysteine (Hcy) appears to be involved in the development of intimal hyperplasia and arterial thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of plasma Hcy with early re-stenosis following carotid eversion endarterectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 398 consecutive patients, 363 were included in this study. 62% of patients had symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Patients had preoperative assessment of Hcy and other well established atherosclerosis risk factors. Intraoperatively, completion angiography was performed in 2 planes. Patients had clinical, Hcy and duplex follow up at 1, 3, 18 and 36 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Complete follow up data were available for 312 patients. Five patients suffered from strokes and 2 patients died during the peri-operative period (combined stroke and death rate of 2%). Mean follow up was 26+/-5 months (range 17 to 36 months). Seventeen and six patients (5.5%) developed a 50-69% and >70% re-stenosis, respectively. Serum creatinine was significantly higher in patients with early re-stenosis, occlusion or stroke after CEA (P=0.043). High grade re-stenosis, occlusion and stroke ipsilateral to the operated side (17 patients) was associated with HbA1C and creatinine (P=0.043 and 0.046, respectively) but not Hcy. CONCLUSION: While Hcy is a recognized independent risk factor for atherothrombosis, our study suggests that there is no association of Hcy with early re-stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.

Plasma D-lactate as a potential early marker for colon ischaemia after open aortic reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The breakdown of mucosal barrier function due to intestinal hypo-perfusion is the earliest dysfunction of ischaemic colitis. Severe colon ischaemia after aortic reconstruction is associated with mortality rates up to 90%. Therefore, early detection and treatment of patients with extensive ischaemic colitis is of crucial importance. In experimental studies, both D-lactate and bacterial endotoxin have been reported as markers of intestinal mucosal barrier impairment. However, evidence of their value in clinical practice is lacking. The aim of this pilot prospective cohort study was to assess the association between ischaemia of the colon (assessed histologically) and plasma levels of D-lactate and endotoxin in patients undergoing open aortic reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients underwent surgery between February and April 2003. Six patients underwent emergency surgery and six patients elective aortic surgery. D-Lactate and endotoxin levels were measured in blood samples collected according to a standardised protocol. For histological examination biopsies were obtained by sigmoidoscopy on days 4-6 after surgery, or earlier if indicated clinically. RESULTS: As early as 2 h postoperatively, elevated plasma levels of d-lactate were measured in patients with histologically proven ischaemic colitis. The peak of D-lactate elevation was on postoperative days 1 and 2. Concentration of plasma endotoxin was not significantly different in patients with or without ischaemic colitis. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that plasma D-lactate levels are a useful marker for early detection of ischaemic colitis secondary to aortic surgery.