RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal osteochondroma (or exostosis) is a rare benign tumour whose clinical manifestations are delayed due to their slow growth and location. Few studies have addressed the characteristics and the diagnostic and therapeutic peculiarities of spinal osteochondroma in children. The objective of this multicentre observational study was to assess the outcomes of a cohort of children after surgery for spinal osteochondroma. HYPOTHESIS: Surgical excision of spinal osteochondroma in children is not followed by complications or recurrences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included consecutive children who had surgery between 2010 and 2018 at any of eight participating centres to remove spinal osteochondromas. The cause, clinical manifestations, and location of the lesions were collected. The surgical outcomes were evaluated after at least 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 22 patients who had surgery to remove 26 spinal osteochondromas at a mean age of 12.8±2.6 years. Among them, 7 had a solitary osteochondroma (SO group) and 15 had hereditary multiple osteochondromas (HMO group). At diagnosis, 72% of patients had clinical signs (spinal pain, n=4; one or more lumps, n=5; and neurological manifestations, n=3). In the HMO group, the diagnosis was made during routine MRI screening for tumours involving the spinal canal. Most osteochondromas involved the cervical spine (n=13), with no difference between the two groups (p=0.9). The lamina was the most common location but 54% of the tumours were growing within the canal (92% in the HMO group). After a mean follow-up of 5.2±4.4 years, no patients had experienced any recurrences or complications related to the disease or treatment. DISCUSSION: Surgical excision of spinal osteochondromas in children is effective, with no medium-term recurrences. Our results also confirm the low peri-operative morbidity, even when the canal is involved, and the absence of any effect at last follow-up on spinal alignment. All patients with neurological manifestations at diagnosis made a full recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective observational cohort study.