Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 12(8 Pt 2): 1699-1708, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30660522

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and examine the relationship between myocardial perfusion and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. BACKGROUND: Although regarded as a nonischemic condition, DCM has been associated with microvascular dysfunction, which is postulated to play a role in its pathogenesis. However, the relationship of the resulting perfusion abnormalities to myocardial fibrosis and the degree of LV remodeling is unclear. METHODS: A total of 65 patients and 35 healthy control subjects underwent adenosine (140 µg/kg/min) stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Stress and rest MBF and MPR were derived using a modified Fermi-constrained deconvolution algorithm. RESULTS: Patients had significantly higher global rest MBF compared with control subjects (1.73 ± 0.42 ml/g/min vs. 1.14 ± 0.42 ml/g/min; p < 0.001). In contrast, global stress MBF was significantly lower versus control subjects (3.07 ± 1.02 ml/g/min vs. 3.53 ± 0.79 ml/g/min; p = 0.02), resulting in impaired MPR in the DCM group (1.83 ± 0.58 vs. 3.50 ± 1.45; p < 0.001). Global stress MBF (2.70 ± 0.89 ml/g/min vs. 3.44 ± 1.03 ml/g/min; p = 0.017) and global MPR (1.67 ± 0.61 vs. 1.99 ± 0.50; p = 0.047) were significantly reduced in patients with DCM with LV ejection fraction ≤35% compared with those with LV ejection fraction >35%. Segments with fibrosis had lower rest MBF (mean difference: -0.12 ml/g/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.23 to -0.01 ml/g/min; p = 0.035) and lower stress MBF (mean difference: -0.15 ml/g/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.28 to -0.03 ml/g/min; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DCM exhibit microvascular dysfunction, the severity of which is associated with the degree of LV impairment. However, rest MBF is elevated rather than reduced in DCM. If microvascular dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of DCM, then the underlying mechanism is more likely to involve stress-induced repetitive stunning rather than chronic myocardial hypoperfusion.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/diagnóstico por imagem , Circulação Coronária , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Microcirculação , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/métodos , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Remodelação Ventricular , Adulto , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/patologia , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fibrose , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Miocárdio/patologia , Compostos Organometálicos/administração & dosagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/patologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia
2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 26(6): 1444-51, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17968886

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To directly compare the three main myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences incorporating parallel acquisition methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 15 subjects (12 men, 57 +/- 15.7 years) referred for diagnostic coronary angiography, we acquired first-pass perfusion images (0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium-DTPA) at rest and during adenosine (140 microg/kg/min) on three separate occasions using three sequences incorporating parallel acquisition methods and approximately equivalent spatiotemporal resolution: hybrid echo planar imaging (hEPI), steady-state free precession (SSFP), and gradient echo imaging (GRE). We calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of each scan and blinded observers scored the presence and severity of artifacts (1, worst to 4, best), diagnostic confidence (0, low to 2, high), transmurality, area, and epicardial vessel territory of perfusion defects. RESULTS: CNR was greatest with SSFP and least with hEPI (13.15 vs 7.85 P < 0.001). The most artifacts were recorded with SSFP and least with hEPI (2.00 vs 3.03 P < 0.001). Observers were significantly more confident in reporting hEPI images (1.6 hEPI vs 0.9 SSFP, P < 0.001). Results for GRE were intermediate for all assessments. CONCLUSION: The hEPI sequence scored best for diagnostic performance despite the SSFP sequence having greater CNR. This trial favors hEPI for clinical myocardial perfusion CMR and suggests CNR should not be the sole criterion used to gauge the best candidate sequence.


Assuntos
Vasos Coronários/anatomia & histologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Artefatos , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Gadolínio DTPA , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA